I guess it should work with 2.8.12. Try to compile their examples, and consult their documentation if it does not work. I cannot give support for a package I have not written.

/Stefan 

My problem is not with wxWidgets itself but with links your program is doing to the wxWidgets. if you can please tell me the wxWidget version you used, I'll use this one instead the version I'm using and I think it will solve the problem.

Tmiron.

I currently use version 2.9.4, but chances are high that it will work with 2.8.12.

/Stefan 

 but was version 2.9.4 the one you used when you built  Version 4.0.0 of the DRS4 oscilloscope program, or was it an erilar version, and if so, do you remeber what version it was?

tmiron.

I used 2.8.12 for Version 4.0.0.

/Stefan 

 Hi Stefan.

I managed to add the averaging possibility to the oscilloscope program, but it runs too slow, so now I'm tring to add this option to the example file you attached to the program (drs_exam.cpp).
My problem is that when I run the file is not passing  the stage of getting the trigger. (it just wait after writing the line "Waiting for trigger...")
When testing the software, I work with a signal of up to 10 MHz, limited in voltage to the DRS Eval 4 ability, and I connect the signal to channel 1,from it by default is supposed to get the trigger. I also tried to change the channel settings to other channels or external trigger, and use them,  but it still not working.

I found out that the problem is related to the line "while (b->IsBusy());" in the code, but I have a problem understanding what the function "IsBusy" do and how it's work.

Can you please explain me a bit what this function does?

have a nice day,

Tmiron

The function b->IsBusy() returns true if there has been no trigger. So "while (b->IsBusy());" is simply an endless loop until the board triggered. Please check your signals and trigger configuration. Maybe you have to adjust the trigger level or polarity via b->SetTriggerLevel(). Try signals with lower event rates. Verify that the board triggers with the DRSOsc program, you can then read off the optimal trigger level from there. 

/Stefan

Hi satefan,

I did some debug on the DRSOsc program and saw that everywhere you used the function "IsBusy()", you used it with "SoftTrigger()", which (to my understanding) create a software trigger. did you used another function, other than "ISBusy", that check the hardware trigger?

have a nice day,

Tmiron.

No. IsBusy() is the only way the hardware trigger is checked. If there is no hardware trigger, you can issue a "fake" trigger (called software trigger) to stop the acquisition. This happens for example if you switch DRSOsc to "Auto" trigger instead of "Normal" trigger, very similar than a normal oscilloscope does.

/Stefan 

 hallo stefan,

I managed to fixed the problem. The problem was with the number I inserted to the function "b->SetTriggerSource" th get external trigger (it suppose to be "16" and not "4" or "12" as I understood from the function's comments).

Right now I'm trying to speed up the number of wavefrom  per second. I'm using your  drs_exam.cpp program you wrote as my basic program. When you wrote it you used the function "b->StartDomino()" inside the loop, which means that before every trigger you gave him a command to start the domino-wave.

From  the "DRS4 datasheet" (page 8) I understand that I can bypass the need to restart the  domino-wave by using "b->SetDominoActive(1)" and "b->SetDominoMode(1)", but when I tried it didn't work (the waveform I got every readout remain the same which means the dominowave froze after the first readout).

Am I understanding wrong or do I need to add somthing more\else so the domino-wave will not stop after each readout? is there any hazard by doing that, as mentiond in page 8 of the the datasheet?

thanks again,

Tmiron.

The Domino wave anyhow is always active in mode 1, but you have to enable the writing to the memory cells (via the DENABLE signal). This is done with the b->StartDomino(). You are right that this call takes about 1ms over USB 2.0, so avoiding it would speed up the DAQ by about a factor of two. I have some plans to implement an automatic restart in firmware of the evaluation board, but I won't have time for that until fall of this year.

/Stefan

I have connected 3 signals to the DRS4 Evaluation Board V5 which look like this in the drsosc app:

Note that here I am sampling at 5 GS/s. Using this app everything works perfect.

Now I want to repeat this using the C++ API (which I am actually wrapping to use within Python, see here if interested https://github.com/SengerM/pydrs ) but can only make this to work at lower sampling frequencies up to 3.9 GS/s. This is how I am configuring the board followint the `drs_exam.cpp` file:

```python
board.set_sampling_frequency(Hz=SAMPLING_FREQ)
board.set_transparent_mode('on')
board.set_input_range(center=0)
board.enable_trigger(True,False) # Don't know what this line does, it was in the example `drs_exam.cpp`.
board.set_trigger_source('ch4')
board.set_trigger_level(volts=-.1)
board.set_trigger_polarity(edge='falling')
board.set_trigger_delay(seconds=TRIGGER_DELAY)

```

The full code is here https://github.com/SengerM/pydrs/blob/master/tests/test_drs.py but anyway, my previous snippet can be considered as pseudo-code and if more details needed I can provide.

This is what I get as I increase the sampling frequency:

Up to 3.95 GS/s it works perfectly. At >= 4 GS/s it just never triggers. A few times I was able to make this work at 4 and 5 GS/s playing with the trigger delay, but this seemed to be some kind of random luck because I was not able to replicate it even with the same values.

Any help is appreciated.

Best,
Matías.

Unfortunately I have not idea what the problem could be. In principle the trigger should be independent of the sampling speed, since the trigger is only made with a discriminator and a flip-flop. The hardware must be ok since you see the trigger with the oscillocope app. All you can do is to go through the sorce code of the oscilloscope app, especially drsosc/Osic.cpp::ScanBoards(), SetTriggerLevel(), SetTriggerPolariy() etc. to make sure you do the same calls as the oscilloscope app.

Stefan

I have seen in the app that the trigger source buttons do something different than the "or" and "transparent trigger" buttons:

If I enable the setup from the right, i.e. OR in CH4 and "Enable Transparent Trigger" the app stops triggering. This is the configuration that seems to be applied in the `drs_exam.cpp` code if I am not mistaken. For some reason in that code it still triggers (I have modified the code to trigger on CH4 instead of CH1 and the trigger level, polarity, etc.).

What does the button in the left actually do? The circular checkbox with the "4" I mean. This is the trigger configuration I want to get in the C++ code.

I also don't know what the function `DRSBoard::EnableTrigger` does, what is the meaning of `flag1` and `flag2`? In my code there is a call to this function which I copied from the example.

Sorry for the spam. Just want to let you know that I was able to solve the problem, it was all due to a `float` being casted as `int` in the Python binding. Now it works like a charm.

 Welcome to the DRS4 Discussion Forum. This forum contains information and discussions related to the DRS4 chip. Please subscribe to this forum to receive automatic email updates. If you have any technical questions, please feel free to post it here.

Hello All,

Are there any design resources available for the WaveDREAM PCBA's?

Thanks In Advance,
John W.

No. This is a proprietary design.

Best,
Stefan

Stefan,

Oh, didn't realize that.

Thanks!
John

I don't know if this question is already documented elsewhere.

I am developing a DAQ code for the DRS evaluation board, v4 for a test beam experiment. I link parts of the existing DRS code as a library.

To understand the effect of various flags used in calls to the functions DRSBoard::GetTime() and DRSBoard::GetWave(), I performed several tests with the 100 MHz signal connected to the inputs of the chip (DRSBoard::EnableTcal()), and several tests with signals from scintillation counters.

My question is about the flag "adjustToClock" in the call to DRSBoard::GetWave(). From looking at the code, I expected it to cause the waveforms to be "rotated" to start from the trigger cell, in a similar way that the flag "rotated" in the call to DRSBoard::GetTime() does for the time array. However, "adjustToClock" seems to shift the waveforms wrongly. I.e., if I want both the time and the amplitude arrays "rotated"  to start from the trigger cell, I should set rotated=true for time and adjustToClock=false for the amplitude. This is also how these functions are called in e.g., Osci::ReadWaveforms().

Is this correct, and does this mean that the amplitude array is "rotated" already during the transfer from the board?

I am using DRS evaluation board serial #2733, firmware revision 30000.

Many thanks,

Strahinja