DRS4 Forum
  DRS4 Discussion Forum, Page 4 of 40  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Author Subject
  747   Fri Mar 8 19:35:11 2019 Abaz KryemadhiROOT Macro for newest software

The older root macro did not work for me for data acquired with the newest software.

so for the newest software and multiple boards, I modified the read_binary.cpp into read_binary.C for those who like to use the root macro, see the attachment.  

 

Attachment 1: read_binary.C
/*
 
   Name:           read_binary.C
   Created by:     Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
   Date:           July 30th, 2014
   Modified By:    Abaz Kryemadhi
   Date:           March 7th, 2019
 
   Purpose:        Example program under ROOT to read a binary data file written 
                   by the DRSOsc program. Decode time and voltages from waveforms 
                   and display them as a graph. Put values into a ROOT Tree for 
                   further analysis.
 
                   To run it, do:
 
                   - Crate a file test.dat via the "Save" button in DRSOsc
                   - start ROOT (type root)
                   root [0] .L read_binary.C+
                   root [1] decode("test.dat");
 
*/
 

#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <math.h>


#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "TFile.h"
#include "TTree.h"
#include "TString.h"
#include "TGraph.h"
#include "TCanvas.h"
#include "Getline.h"
#include "TAxis.h"

typedef struct {
   char           tag[3];
   char           version;
} FHEADER;

typedef struct {
   char           time_header[4];
} THEADER;

typedef struct {
   char           bn[2];
   unsigned short board_serial_number;
} BHEADER;

typedef struct {
   char           event_header[4];
   unsigned int   event_serial_number;
   unsigned short year;
   unsigned short month;
   unsigned short day;
   unsigned short hour;
   unsigned short minute;
   unsigned short second;
   unsigned short millisecond;
   unsigned short range;
} EHEADER;

typedef struct {
   char           tc[2];
   unsigned short trigger_cell;
} TCHEADER;

typedef struct {
   char           c[1];
   char           cn[3];
} CHEADER;

/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

//int main(int argc, const char * argv[])
void decode(char *filename) {

   FHEADER  fh;
   THEADER  th;
   BHEADER  bh;
   EHEADER  eh;
   TCHEADER tch;
   CHEADER  ch;
   
   unsigned int scaler;
   unsigned short voltage[1024];
   double waveform[16][4][1024], time[16][4][1024];
   float bin_width[16][4][1024];
   int i, j, b, chn, n, chn_index, n_boards;
   double t1, t2, dt;
   //char filename[256];
   char rootfile[256];
   int ndt;
   double threshold, sumdt, sumdt2;
   double sum, baseline, max,amplitude1,amplitude2, amplitude3,amplitude4;
   
   // open the binary waveform file
   FILE *f = fopen(filename, "rb");
   if (f == NULL) {
      printf("Cannot find file \'%s\'\n", filename);
      return;
   }
   
   
    //open the root file
   strcpy(rootfile, filename);
   if (strchr(rootfile, '.'))
      *strchr(rootfile, '.') = 0;
   strcat(rootfile, ".root");
   TFile *outfile = new TFile(rootfile, "RECREATE");
   
   // define the rec tree
   TTree *rec = new TTree("rec","rec");
   rec->Branch("t1", time[0][0]     ,"t1[1024]/D");  
   rec->Branch("t2", time[0][1]     ,"t2[1024]/D");  
   rec->Branch("t3", time[0][2]     ,"t3[1024]/D");  
   rec->Branch("t4", time[0][3]     ,"t4[1024]/D");  
   rec->Branch("w1", waveform[0][0] ,"w1[1024]/D");
   rec->Branch("w2", waveform[0][1] ,"w2[1024]/D");
   rec->Branch("w3", waveform[0][2] ,"w3[1024]/D");
   rec->Branch("w4", waveform[0][3] ,"w4[1024]/D");
   rec->Branch("amplitude1", &amplitude1,"amplitude1/D");
   rec->Branch("amplitude2", &amplitude2,"amplitude2/D");
   rec->Branch("amplitude3", &amplitude3,"amplitude3/D");
   rec->Branch("amplitude4", &amplitude4,"amplitude4/D");
   // create canvas
   TCanvas *c1 = new TCanvas();
   
   // create graph
   TGraph *g = new TGraph(1024, (double *)time[0][0], (double *)waveform[0][0]);


   // read file header
   fread(&fh, sizeof(fh), 1, f);
   if (fh.tag[0] != 'D' || fh.tag[1] != 'R' || fh.tag[2] != 'S') {
      printf("Found invalid file header in file \'%s\', aborting.\n", filename);
      return;
   }
   
   if (fh.version != '2') {
      printf("Found invalid file version \'%c\' in file \'%s\', should be \'2\', aborting.\n", fh.version, filename);
      return;
   }

   // read time header
   fread(&th, sizeof(th), 1, f);
   if (memcmp(th.time_header, "TIME", 4) != 0) {
      printf("Invalid time header in file \'%s\', aborting.\n", filename);
      return;
   }

   for (b = 0 ; ; b++) {
      // read board header
      fread(&bh, sizeof(bh), 1, f);
      if (memcmp(bh.bn, "B#", 2) != 0) {
         // probably event header found
         fseek(f, -4, SEEK_CUR);
         break;
      }
      
      printf("Found data for board #%d\n", bh.board_serial_number);
      
      // read time bin widths
      memset(bin_width[b], sizeof(bin_width[0]), 0);
      for (chn=0 ; chn<5 ; chn++) {
         fread(&ch, sizeof(ch), 1, f);
         if (ch.c[0] != 'C') {
            // event header found
            fseek(f, -4, SEEK_CUR);
            break;
         }
         i = ch.cn[2] - '0' - 1;
         printf("Found timing calibration for channel #%d\n", i+1);
         fread(&bin_width[b][i][0], sizeof(float), 1024, f);
         // fix for 2048 bin mode: double channel
         if (bin_width[b][i][1023] > 10 || bin_width[b][i][1023] < 0.01) {
            for (j=0 ; j<512 ; j++)
               bin_width[b][i][j+512] = bin_width[b][i][j];
         }
      }
   }
   n_boards = b;
   
   // initialize statistics
   ndt = 0;
   sumdt = sumdt2 = 0;
   
   // loop over all events in the data file
   for (n=0 ; ; n++) {
      // read event header
      i = (int)fread(&eh, sizeof(eh), 1, f);
      if (i < 1)
         break;
      
      printf("Found event #%d %d %d\n", eh.event_serial_number, eh.second, eh.millisecond);
      
      // loop over all boards in data file
      for (b=0 ; b<n_boards ; b++) {
         
         // read board header
         fread(&bh, sizeof(bh), 1, f);
         if (memcmp(bh.bn, "B#", 2) != 0) {
            printf("Invalid board header in file \'%s\', aborting.\n", filename);
            return;
         }
         
         // read trigger cell
         fread(&tch, sizeof(tch), 1, f);
         if (memcmp(tch.tc, "T#", 2) != 0) {
            printf("Invalid trigger cell header in file \'%s\', aborting.\n", filename);
            return;
         }

         if (n_boards > 1)
            printf("Found data for board #%d\n", bh.board_serial_number);
         
         // reach channel data
         for (chn=0 ; chn<4 ; chn++) {
            
            // read channel header
            fread(&ch, sizeof(ch), 1, f);
            if (ch.c[0] != 'C') {
               // event header found
               fseek(f, -4, SEEK_CUR);
               break;
            }
            chn_index = ch.cn[2] - '0' - 1;
            fread(&scaler, sizeof(int), 1, f);
            fread(voltage, sizeof(short), 1024, f);
            
            for (i=0 ; i<1024 ; i++) {
               // convert data to volts
               waveform[b][chn_index][i] = (voltage[i] / 65536. + eh.range/1000.0 - 0.5);
               
               // calculate time for this cell
               for (j=0,time[b][chn_index][i]=0 ; j<i ; j++)
                  time[b][chn_index][i] += bin_width[b][chn_index][(j+tch.trigger_cell) % 1024];
            }
         }
         
         // align cell #0 of all channels
         t1 = time[b][0][(1024-tch.trigger_cell) % 1024];
         for (chn=1 ; chn<4 ; chn++) {
            t2 = time[b][chn][(1024-tch.trigger_cell) % 1024];
            dt = t1 - t2;
            for (i=0 ; i<1024 ; i++)
               time[b][chn][i] += dt;
         }
         
         t1 = t2 = 0;
         threshold = 0.3;
         
         // find peak in channel 1 above threshold
         for (i=0 ; i<1022 ; i++)
            if (waveform[b][0][i] < threshold && waveform[b][0][i+1] >= threshold) {
               t1 = (threshold-waveform[b][0][i])/(waveform[b][0][i+1]-waveform[b][0][i])*(time[b][0][i+1]-time[b][0][i])+time[b][0][i];
               break;
            }
         
         // find peak in channel 2 above threshold
         for (i=0 ; i<1022 ; i++)
            if (waveform[b][1][i] < threshold && waveform[b][1][i+1] >= threshold) {
               t2 = (threshold-waveform[b][1][i])/(waveform[b][1][i+1]-waveform[b][1][i])*(time[b][1][i+1]-time[b][1][i])+time[b][1][i];
               break;
            }
         
         // calculate distance of peaks with statistics
         if (t1 > 0 && t2 > 0) {
            ndt++;
            dt = t2 - t1;
            sumdt += dt;
            sumdt2 += dt*dt;
         }
     //Find baseline for channel 3 to get amplitude for ch3 
     sum=0.0;
      for (i=0 ; i<10; i++) {
         sum+=waveform[0][2][i];
       } 
       baseline=sum/10;
     //Find amplitude for channel 3 (this is example channel )
     max=-10000.0;
      for (i=0 ; i<1022; i++) {
         if (waveform[b][2][i]>max) {
            max=waveform[b][2][i];
       } 
      }
       amplitude3=max;
     // fill root tree
      rec->Fill();

  //Uncomment the following to see couple waveforms of voltage vs time
  /*   
      // fill graph
      for (i=0 ; i<1024 ; i++)
         g->SetPoint(i, time[b][2][i], waveform[b][2][i]);
      
      // draw graph and wait for user click
... 20 more lines ...
  746   Wed Mar 6 10:09:01 2019 Willy Changdrscl "no board found" in some Win7 or Win8.X PCs

Hi all, 

When connecting the board and running the Zadig program, some Windows PCs may return "driver installation failed." I coudn't find the solution from their download website. So I started the drscl first. Apparently it shows: Successfully scanned, but no boards found. Therefore I checked the Device Manager. A breakdown warning triangle appears under the serial port...

The possible solution may be found here.

Infact, the WinUsb driver has been in existence in your PC. One can just follow the instructions here: 

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/usbcon/winusb-installation 

  1. Plug in your device to the host system.
  2. Open Device Manager and locate the device.
  3. Right-click the device and select Update driver software... from the context menu.
  4. In the wizard, select Browse my computer for driver software.
  5. Select Let me pick from a list of device drivers on my computer.
  6. From the list of device classes, select Universal Serial Bus devices.
  7. The wizard displays WinUsb Device. Select it to load the driver.

In the wizard, somehow the default setting displays Microsoft Device on the Top of the list and replaced the WinUsb Device. You can easily re-load the WinUsb Device. Just ignore the WARNING from the device manager. The board should work fine now. 

Willy

  745   Mon Feb 25 08:48:27 2019 Stefan Rittno board found

"dynamic" or "static" does not matter, as long as you don't use your program on another computer. I have no more idea about the "no board found" problem. It works ok on all computers I tried at our lab.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

 

Hello. When compiling drs_exam, do you need to use a "static "version of usblib or a "dynamic" version?"The problem with "no board found" is not solved. Thanks for your help.

Lev

  744   Mon Feb 25 08:40:44 2019 Lev Pavlovno board found

 

Hello. When compiling drs_exam, do you need to use a "static "version of usblib or a "dynamic" version?"The problem with "no board found" is not solved. Thanks for your help.

Lev.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Could be. Have you tried that elog:657

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Yes, the program is running as administrator. By the way, this is win10. Your drs_exam works fine. My drs_exam compiled wrote no board found. Maybe this is a problem like in the post https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/DRS4+Forum/698. Maybe there were solutions to the problems?

Thank You

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

No idea. Maye some access problem. Have you tried to start your program under an admin account?

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Great, drs_exam compiles without problems. Now when you run the compiled file drs_exam writes board not found, but drsosc and drscl work without problems. What could possibly be the matter?

thanks for your patience

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

 

 

 

 

 

  743   Thu Feb 21 09:57:53 2019 Stefan Rittno board found

Could be. Have you tried that elog:657

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Yes, the program is running as administrator. By the way, this is win10. Your drs_exam works fine. My drs_exam compiled wrote no board found. Maybe this is a problem like in the post https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/DRS4+Forum/698. Maybe there were solutions to the problems?

Thank You

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

No idea. Maye some access problem. Have you tried to start your program under an admin account?

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Great, drs_exam compiles without problems. Now when you run the compiled file drs_exam writes board not found, but drsosc and drscl work without problems. What could possibly be the matter?

thanks for your patience

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

 

 

 

 

  742   Thu Feb 21 09:51:24 2019 Lev Pavlovno board found

Hey. Yes, the program is running as administrator. By the way, this is win10. Your drs_exam works fine. My drs_exam compiled wrote no board found. Maybe this is a problem like in the post https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/DRS4+Forum/698. Maybe there were solutions to the problems?

Thank You

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

No idea. Maye some access problem. Have you tried to start your program under an admin account?

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Great, drs_exam compiles without problems. Now when you run the compiled file drs_exam writes board not found, but drsosc and drscl work without problems. What could possibly be the matter?

thanks for your patience

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

 

 

 

  740   Wed Feb 20 12:56:56 2019 Stefan Rittmeg?

No idea. Maye some access problem. Have you tried to start your program under an admin account?

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Great, drs_exam compiles without problems. Now when you run the compiled file drs_exam writes board not found, but drsosc and drscl work without problems. What could possibly be the matter?

thanks for your patience

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

 

 

  739   Wed Feb 20 12:13:44 2019 Lev Pavlovmeg?

Great, drs_exam compiles without problems. Now when you run the compiled file drs_exam writes board not found, but drsosc and drscl work without problems. What could possibly be the matter?

thanks for your patience

Lev

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

 

  738   Wed Feb 20 08:08:42 2019 Stefan Rittmeg?

You have to change the path to libusb-1.0.lib to the one where you installed it.

Stefan

Lev Pavlov wrote:

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

 

  737   Wed Feb 20 08:03:04 2019 Lev Pavlovmeg?

Hey. Strange problem. Why does the compiler refer there at all? Library installed drsosc works

 

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "C:\meg\online\drivers\drs\libusb-1.0\libusb-1.0.lib"

  736   Mon Feb 4 18:18:22 2019 Stefan RittDifferent Distances between the sampling points

 elog:361

Hans Steiger wrote:

Sorry.... but is there a solution or a Root Macro, that reads the waveforms into a Root-Tree? I simply can not work anymore with the data. 

Can you tell me, which software was in use in early 2017?

All the best,

 

Hans

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

The sampling points are NOT equidestant, they have varying bin widths of 150ps to 250ps at 5GS/s. That's due the way the DRS4 chip works. You might have neglected that fact in the past, but that would have led to poor timing resolutions (typically 1-2ns resolution only). To get bins with the same width, you have to treat your waveform as a real X/Y points (or better U/T), and the re-sample that cure, maybe spline-interpolated, at 200ps bins.

Stefan

Hans Steiger wrote:

Dear All,

with the older software for my V5 Board i did not have the problem, that the distance between the sampling points (in time) is not the same (e.g. a sampling point all 200ps for 5GS/s). 

How can i fix this?

Can someone provide me the software for the board which is old enough to not have this problem. All my Root interpreters produce problems with this new data format.  Which version would be old enough?

 

All the best and thanks a lot,

 

Hans

 

 

 

  735   Mon Feb 4 17:36:49 2019 Hans SteigerDifferent Distances between the sampling points

Sorry.... but is there a solution or a Root Macro, that reads the waveforms into a Root-Tree? I simply can not work anymore with the data. 

Can you tell me, which software was in use in early 2017?

All the best,

 

Hans

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

The sampling points are NOT equidestant, they have varying bin widths of 150ps to 250ps at 5GS/s. That's due the way the DRS4 chip works. You might have neglected that fact in the past, but that would have led to poor timing resolutions (typically 1-2ns resolution only). To get bins with the same width, you have to treat your waveform as a real X/Y points (or better U/T), and the re-sample that cure, maybe spline-interpolated, at 200ps bins.

Stefan

Hans Steiger wrote:

Dear All,

with the older software for my V5 Board i did not have the problem, that the distance between the sampling points (in time) is not the same (e.g. a sampling point all 200ps for 5GS/s). 

How can i fix this?

Can someone provide me the software for the board which is old enough to not have this problem. All my Root interpreters produce problems with this new data format.  Which version would be old enough?

 

All the best and thanks a lot,

 

Hans

 

 

  734   Mon Feb 4 16:46:04 2019 Stefan RittDifferent Distances between the sampling points

The sampling points are NOT equidestant, they have varying bin widths of 150ps to 250ps at 5GS/s. That's due the way the DRS4 chip works. You might have neglected that fact in the past, but that would have led to poor timing resolutions (typically 1-2ns resolution only). To get bins with the same width, you have to treat your waveform as a real X/Y points (or better U/T), and the re-sample that cure, maybe spline-interpolated, at 200ps bins.

Stefan

Hans Steiger wrote:

Dear All,

with the older software for my V5 Board i did not have the problem, that the distance between the sampling points (in time) is not the same (e.g. a sampling point all 200ps for 5GS/s). 

How can i fix this?

Can someone provide me the software for the board which is old enough to not have this problem. All my Root interpreters produce problems with this new data format.  Which version would be old enough?

 

All the best and thanks a lot,

 

Hans

 

  733   Mon Feb 4 16:42:08 2019 Hans SteigerDifferent Distances between the sampling points

Dear All,

with the older software for my V5 Board i did not have the problem, that the distance between the sampling points (in time) is not the same (e.g. a sampling point all 200ps for 5GS/s). 

How can i fix this?

Can someone provide me the software for the board which is old enough to not have this problem. All my Root interpreters produce problems with this new data format.  Which version would be old enough?

 

All the best and thanks a lot,

 

Hans

  732   Sat Feb 2 10:10:22 2019 Stefan RittSaving Rate (only 15Acq/s)

The reduction of rate is because you save in XML format, which is an ASCII format, so human readable, but takes long to write. If you switch to binary format and write on a decent fast hard disk, you should get back to 450 Acq/s.

Stefan

Hans Steiger wrote:

Dear All,

 

when I use my Evaluation Board with some PMTs I can digitize 450 Acq/s or so. But when I want to save the waveforms the rate goes down. The Acqu. rate with saving is in the range of 14Hz up to 24 Hz.

I normally use the .txt file. I try to use the 5GS/s but also with much lower sampling rate the saving rate is not getting much better. 

Is this a problem of my McBook connected to the Evaluation Board?

 

All the best,

 

Hans 

 

  731   Sat Feb 2 00:13:12 2019 Hans SteigerSaving Rate (only 15Acq/s)

Dear All,

 

when I use my Evaluation Board with some PMTs I can digitize 450 Acq/s or so. But when I want to save the waveforms the rate goes down. The Acqu. rate with saving is in the range of 14Hz up to 24 Hz.

I normally use the .txt file. I try to use the 5GS/s but also with much lower sampling rate the saving rate is not getting much better. 

Is this a problem of my McBook connected to the Evaluation Board?

 

All the best,

 

Hans 

  730   Wed Jan 30 17:08:58 2019 Stefan RittROOT Macro for data acquired with the newest software

This one elog:361 should still work.

Stefan

Abaz Kryemadhi wrote:

Hello,

Is there a root macro for decoding binary data acquired with the newest software for single board or multi-boards daisy chained?

Cheers,

Abaz

 

  729   Wed Jan 30 08:02:25 2019 Stefan RittDRS4 domino wave stability study

The Domino wave is most stable at 5 GSPS, slowly degrades down to 3-2 GSPS, and at 1GSPS gets some significant jitter. This is for internal reasons in the chip and cannot be compensated by the loop filter. It is therefore important to run it as fast as possible if you want to achieve best timing resolution. As a rule of thumb, the jitter at 5 GSPS is about 20-25 ps, and at 1 GSPS it is maybe 150 ps. If you require good timing resolution, you can use the 9th channel to sample a stable reference clock (100 MHz for example) and measure timing relative to that clock. This way you can bring down the resolution to a few ps at 5GSPS and to maybe 40 ps at 1 GSPS.

Stefan

Saurabh Neema wrote:

We have been using DRS4 IC in our design for quite some time and it is giving good performance.

Till now we were using Domino wave frequency as 1 GSPS by use of reference clock to DRS4 and internal PLL of DRS4. Recently we tried to use 4GSPS by modifying the reference clock.

What I have found that DRS4 domino wave is more stable at 4 GSPS as compared to 1 GSPS by doing the timing jitter analysis. I am not sure if it is the property of DRS4 IC to be having more stable domino wave at higher frequency (by design) or it is due to some external effects like PLL loop filter or any other on board parasitic effects.

Please share if anyone has done any study of DRS4 Domino wave stability at different sampling frequencies.

Thanks,

 

 

  728   Wed Jan 30 06:51:37 2019 Saurabh NeemaDRS4 domino wave stability study

We have been using DRS4 IC in our design for quite some time and it is giving good performance.

Till now we were using Domino wave frequency as 1 GSPS by use of reference clock to DRS4 and internal PLL of DRS4. Recently we tried to use 4GSPS by modifying the reference clock.

What I have found that DRS4 domino wave is more stable at 4 GSPS as compared to 1 GSPS by doing the timing jitter analysis. I am not sure if it is the property of DRS4 IC to be having more stable domino wave at higher frequency (by design) or it is due to some external effects like PLL loop filter or any other on board parasitic effects.

Please share if anyone has done any study of DRS4 Domino wave stability at different sampling frequencies.

Thanks,

 

  727   Tue Jan 29 14:43:44 2019 Abaz KryemadhiROOT Macro for data acquired with the newest software

Hello,

Is there a root macro for decoding binary data acquired with the newest software for single board or multi-boards daisy chained?

Cheers,

Abaz

ELOG V3.1.4-80633ba