Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon3.gif   Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Yoshio Imai on Tue Apr 3 13:17:27 2007 
    icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 3 14:26:09 2007 
       icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 3 15:19:00 2007 
       icon7.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Yoshio Imai on Tue Apr 3 17:55:21 2007 elcode_generation.png
          icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 3 21:09:47 2007 
          icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 3 22:10:56 2007 
          icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 4 12:14:12 2007 
             icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Apr 4 14:20:41 2007 
                icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 5 10:01:06 2007 
    icon2.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 4 08:38:30 2007 
       icon14.gif   Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Apr 4 11:37:56 2007 
Message ID: 2187     Entry time: Tue Apr 3 17:55:21 2007     In reply to: 2183     Reply to this: 2188   2189   2192
Icon: Smile  Author: Yoshio Imai  Author Email:  
Category: Bug report  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.6.4-1826 
Subject: Re: Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks 

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Well, you didn't realize, but you were my beta-tester for the keyboard shortcuts Big grin . I didn't yet publish it, so you must have gotten this brand new feature from SVN.

You should really have told me Wink . Actually, I found out about the <Ctrl-C> issue while using this logbook.

Stefan Ritt wrote:
So get the SVN update, and let me know what you think

Did so, we are running now -1826. I think it is very usable, with maybe one exception (this might be a browser issue, however): When using the shortcuts and/or the ELCode buttons, sometimes the code is generated and the cursor in between the [XX] and [/XX] directive, but sometimes, the whole code directive is selected as if for editing

which prevents from immediately continuing to type (which, I guess, was the idea behind the shortcuts). The behaviour is not completely reproducible, and I have even seen it change during one and the same browser (=firefox) session while working on the same entry (*). I also had it once that the browser out of a sudden completely ignored the ELCode meaning, and instead used <Ctrl-I> for page info and <Ctrl-B> for the history.

(*) It just happened again!


BTW, there are (of course Big grin) two other issues. They are still present in -1826
- one bug was reported by a logbook user: when using the "find" function in a logbook, and selecting one value from the "Author" drop-down list and another from the "Category" drop-down list, the elogd reports no entries found, but when specifying only the "Author" and leaving "Category" blank, many entries are found, including those with the "Category" being looked for. When specifying only the "Category" and leaving the "Author" blank, the elogd also reports no entries found. Has anyone reported a similar behaviour?

- We have one logbook top group for the beamtimes. Under certain conditions, a preset text is to be displayed.
{2&a} Preset Text = resource/text_1.txt
{2&b} Preset Text = resource/text_2.txt
However, the definitions of these conditions have to be repeated for every logbook in the group (putting it only under [global beamtimes] doesn't do it), otherwise they are ignored.

Any idea on these?
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf