|
|
|
Demo
Discussion
|
|
Forum
Config Examples
Contributions
Vulnerabilities
|
| Discussion forum about ELOG |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Message ID: 2324
Entry time: Sat Oct 6 15:56:13 2007
In reply to: 2323
Reply to this: 2325
|
|
| Category: |
Question |
OS: |
Windows |
ELOG Version: |
2.6.5-1890 |
|
| Subject: |
Re: testing for the limit of the elog database |
|
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | So there are only 2 user defined fields in the database.
Everything works ......... but terrible slow : is there a rule of thumb for the size of the database ? |
Yes. The rule of thumb is that currently elog runs fine for a few 10000 entries. At 100000 entries it starts getting slow. I have already in my to-do list the task to improve the performance for large databases, and I have a rough idea where the bottleneck is, but I pushed the priority low because not many people have large databases right now (but it might change in the future). How many entries do you have? (It's not the size of the entries, but the number!) |
That's a quick answer.  I just was testing. I'm trying to introduce elog at work, so i'm not having an actual database in production. In the test database I had 125386 entries. Two column: "Customers name" and "documents".
By the way : my email address has changed : how do I change that ??
Thanks |