Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon1.gif   Installation problems, posted by George B. on Mon Oct 27 13:05:13 2008 
    icon2.gif   Re: Installation problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 29 05:53:39 2008 
       icon2.gif   Re: Installation problems, posted by George B. on Wed Nov 5 10:32:07 2008 
       icon3.gif   Re: Installation problems, posted by T. Ribbrock on Wed Nov 5 11:52:12 2008 elog
          icon4.gif   elog init script, posted by Yoshio Imai on Mon Nov 10 13:05:21 2008 
          icon2.gif   Re: Installation problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 17 11:42:46 2008 
             icon2.gif   Re: Installation problems, posted by T. Ribbrock on Thu Nov 27 11:47:34 2008 
Message ID: 66033     Entry time: Wed Nov 5 10:32:07 2008     In reply to: 66020
Icon: Reply  Author: George B.  Author Email: i93.borg@gmail.com 
Category: Bug report  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.7.5 
Subject: Re: Installation problems 
> The elogd (or elogd.init in the distribution) is written for RedHat based systems where echo_success gives the 
> typical output with a green [OK] at the end of the line. For Debian, there is (was) in principle a Debian package 
> which has it's own startup script. Since the package maintainer is not active any more (I guess), the Debian 
> updates are heavily old. Once elog gets managed inside Debian again, that should get better again, but until then 
> one has to follow 2) and 3) from above. If I would remove it, the Scientific Linux users would complain. 

That makes sense. Might be worth adding a short Debian section to the installation instructions page?

FYI, Elog is no longer in Debian as of 2008-05-12.


Thanks,

George.
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf