Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon5.gif   SQL Database, posted by lance on Thu Sep 2 10:30:14 2010 
    icon2.gif   Re: SQL Database, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 15 00:21:10 2010 
    icon2.gif   Re: SQL Database, posted by Bill Pier on Thu Sep 23 17:22:43 2010 
Message ID: 66901     Entry time: Wed Sep 15 00:21:10 2010     In reply to: 66886
Icon: Reply  Author: Stefan Ritt  Author Email: stefan.ritt@psi.ch 
Category: Question  OS: Windows  ELOG Version: 2.7.6-2230 
Subject: Re: SQL Database 

lance wrote:

We have been running elog for a few years now and its solid. The only thing is we are getting to 140k entries over a few books and its starting to slow down whist searching. My questions is can we go to an SQL type database rather than a flat file? Is it worth it? Is anyone running this type of configuration?

Running through a SQL database requires a major rework of the software. I'm planning this in the long run, but not for this year. I'm also not sure how much this would buy you. If you do a full-text search on 140k entries in a SQL database (not index search), this might also take some time.

But what you can do is to "archive" part of your logbooks. Since the files are named YYMMDDa.log, you can move all 09XXXXXa.log files into a separate "archive" which you then do not include in your search.  

ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf