Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon5.gif   Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by David Pilgram on Mon Jun 3 20:02:38 2013 
    icon2.gif   Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 12:03:18 2013 
       icon2.gif   Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 4 15:00:23 2013 
Message ID: 67528     Entry time: Tue Jun 4 15:00:23 2013     In reply to: 67525
Icon: Reply  Author: David Pilgram  Author Email: David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk 
Category: Question  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.9.2-2475 
Subject: Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID). 
> > By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number.  When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
> > shown in strict order of ID.  In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
> > thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.  
> > 
> > In collapsed mode, it is only the starting entry of each thread is shown (or the latest one if "collapse to
> > last" chosen, but that's a detail).
> > 
> > I have a couple of logbooks where I'd like the default sorting to be by another numeric attribute that I enter. 
> > 
> > Now this works fine in Full or Summary mode.  In threaded mode (e.g. default for this forum, where every entry
> > is shown but are grouped by thread), it works in as much as all the entres are there and in order, but it
> > doesn't quite look the same as when sorting by ID - the replies are not each offset further right beneath the
> > entry it is in reply to, but all just slightly offset to the first entry.  
> > 
> > If you try to [completely] collapse the threaded mode to just one line per threaded topic - it doesn't.  Looks
> > (almost) the same as threaded.
> > 
> > I was hoping to get the list of entries collapsed to one line per thread, in order of the numeric attribute, but
> > I cannot seem to get this to happen.   Have I missed something here?  Or is it possible at all?
> 
> This is not possible at the moment, but I will add it to the wish list.

OK, Thanks Stefan.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6