|
|
|
Demo
Discussion
|
|
Forum
Config Examples
Contributions
Vulnerabilities
|
| Discussion forum about ELOG |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Message ID: 69409
Entry time: Thu Nov 4 13:48:00 2021
In reply to: 69408
|
|
| Category: |
Question |
OS: |
Linux |
ELOG Version: |
elog-3.1.4-2 |
|
| Subject: |
Re: results of security scan |
|
|
Thanks, I'll try that and see what happens
David
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
The elgod.c progarm itself is rather weak in SSL, since I just don't have time to catch up with the latest SSL enhancements. The safest you can do is to put an industry-strenth web server like Apache in front of elogd and let that server handle the SSL layer.
Stefan
| David Stops wrote: |
|
Recently central IT scanned our elog server and reported the following "vulnerabilities"
- 42873 (1) - SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported (SWEET32)
- 51192 (1) - SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
- 65821 (1) - SSL RC4 Cipher Suites Supported (Bar Mitzvah)
- 85582 (1) - Web Application Potentially Vulnerable to Clickjacking
Is there any easy way of preventing these
Thanks and Best Wishes
David
|
|
|