Re: length of fields, posted by Paul Harrington on Tue Mar 8 13:16:14 2005
|
The reason for the earlier question is that we are trying to use Elog to store
data in a form we'd need to store more 1500 characters in more than one field.
|
|
Re: Compilation flag/file question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 8 17:34:05 2005
|
> If I want to go to the latest CVS release, what files do I have to compile
> along with the elogd.c file? Also, do I need to use any special gcc flags
> for the compilation? Thanks.
|
|
Re: Compilation flag/file question, posted by Benjamin Brown on Tue Mar 8 19:23:14 2005
|
> > If I want to go to the latest CVS release, what files do I have to compile
> > along with the elogd.c file? Also, do I need to use any special gcc flags
> > for the compilation? Thanks.
|
|
Re: length of fields, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 8 20:28:49 2005
|
> Is it possible to get around this problem by having more then one main text field
> per record?
|
|
Re: 2 Extendable options when created new entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 14 21:00:57 2005
|
| I fixed this problem in revision 1.586. It will be contained in the next release. |
|
Re: Display <attribute> do erroneously encoded, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 14 21:11:11 2005
|
>
> Display subject = <b>$subject</b>
>
|
|
Re: Non clickable column, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 14 21:56:15 2005
|
> I talk about the column contents. In fact on ELOG, we store password so its
> more easyer to click twice on it to select them and after to copy them instead
> of select from right to left the password and to try to copy them. The HMTL
|
|
Re: Non clickable column, posted by Alex H on Tue Mar 15 14:11:48 2005
|
> > I talk about the column contents. In fact on ELOG, we store password so its
> > more easyer to click twice on it to select them and after to copy them instead
> > of select from right to left the password and to try to copy them. The HMTL
|