Re: hosts allow, posted by Susan James on Thu Dec 7 21:54:58 2017
|
Hi All,
We're still having trouble with hosts.allow and hosts.deny.
We're trying to allow all of our domain lbl.gov to the access list
for our logbooks. But the combination below is not working.
==========================
[ below denies ALL ]
Hosts allow = .lbl.gov
Hosts deny = ALL
[ below denies ALL ]
Hosts deny = ALL
Hosts allow = .lbl.gov
========================
Can someone help?
Susan James wrote: |
thanks for your quick reply.
the configuration is still not working. See my entry below which denies everyone.
I've tried many different combinations of 'hosts allow and hosts deny'
we want to restrict all our logbooks to only domain lbl.gov
[ below denies ALL ]
Hosts allow = .lbl.gov
Hosts deny = ALL
[ below denies ALL ]
Hosts deny = ALL
Hosts allow = .lbl.gov
Can you help?
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Susan,
according to the documentation you need to add "Hosts deny = All" in addition to the "Hosts allow" command.
Here is the relevant excerpt from the documentation (https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#access).
Cheers
Andreas
Hosts allow = <list>
Hosts deny = <list>
These two settings can be used to restrict the access to the logbook to certain computers. It is similar to the UNIX hosts.allow and hosts.deny files. The list can consist of individual host names or IP numbers, subnet masks like 123.213. (note the trailing '.') or .mit.edu , or the word All . The following rules are applied:
- Access will be granted when a host matches a pattern in "hosts allow".
- Otherwise, access will be denied when a host matches a pattern in "hosts deny".
- Otherwise, access will be granted.
These rules are applied before any password is checked. To debug problems, start elogd with the "-v" flag, in which case the rule checking is printed on the screen.
Susan James wrote: |
I'm trying to wrap our elog instance to our company domain which is lbl.gov
I add this entry below (without quotes) to elogd.cfg and it's not working. the world can see our logbooks
" Hosts Allow = *.lbl.gov ".
can someone help?
|
|
|
|
How to add bulk client list at once, posted by Sunilkumar on Sun Mar 29 13:30:09 2020
|
Please let me know how to add Button for adding client next to Client Mnemonics.
I need to add bulk client lists in the Elog page there are 1000+ clients .
I need to select client from the drop down list if its not there i need to add them using Add Client Button
Please let me know the steps.
|
Re: How to add bulk client list at once, posted by Sunilkumar on Wed Apr 1 19:27:53 2020
|
Hi Stefan
Thanks for Response , It helped me lot .
is it possible to give refence to include 1000 clients in one file and adding that referece file to Roptions ?
Once we click Client Mnemonic it should fetch the data from that file and return the Client Name .
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Options are limited to 200. To add options dynamically, use
Extendable options = <name>
as desribed in the manual.
Stefan
Sunilkumar wrote: |
Please let me know how to add Button for adding client next to Client Mnemonics.
I need to add bulk client lists in the Elog page there are 1000+ clients .
I need to select client from the drop down list if its not there i need to add them using Add Client Button
Please let me know the steps.
|
|
|
Conditional conditions?, posted by Steve Woughter on Tue Apr 12 16:07:12 2005
|
Can conditional attributes be assigned as conditions?
Arbitraty Example:
Attributes = Operating system, Version, Name
Options Opperating system = Linux {1}, Windows {2}
{1} Options Version = 2.2 {a}, 2.4 {b}, 2.6 {c}
{2} Options Version = ME {d}, 2k {e}, NT {f}, XP {g}
{1&a} Options Name = This computer
{1&b} Options Name = That Computer
{2&f} Options Name = Workstation
and so on..? |
Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Mon Jun 30 10:55:29 2008
|
We use elog for (amongst other things) a simple change management log. About two dozen users allowed to do updates and their email addresses are listed at the bottom of the page to allow any of them to be included on circulation for a change request. The email addresses appear in the order that they were added (i.e. apparently random). Is there any way to sort these, ideally by Last part of Full Name/First part of Full Name, but login name or email address would be OK?
Thanks for a great piece of software.
Steve |
Special characters in attribute names, posted by Steve Williamson on Thu Nov 13 13:23:32 2008
|
Hi
Thanks for elog - it's a brilliant piece of software. I'd looked all over for open source software to log/manage change requests before discovering elog; it's so flexible that I've been able to do everything I need with it.
However, I think that I've just discovered my first undocumented 'feature'. Attribute names containing punctuation characters (e.g. / and :) cause "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded" errors in Firefox 3.0.2 and corrupt the URL if they're used in a Quick Filter. I often use '/' in attribute names for brevity, e.g. "Old/New Versions" but hadn't used one in a Quick Filter before.
keep up the good work.
regards
Steve
|
Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Thu Nov 13 13:25:25 2008
|
Hi
I've just upgraded to 2.7.5 mainly because I wanted to have Museremail sorted. We use this to list contacts on an RFC form and it's much easier to find the ones you want when they are in a predictable sequence. As an extension to this it would be great if they could be sorted by the last part of their real name - typical user, give him a sweetie and he wants jam on it!
cheers
Steve |
Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Mon Nov 17 12:07:18 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Williamson wrote: |
Hi
I've just upgraded to 2.7.5 mainly because I wanted to have Museremail sorted. We use this to list contacts on an RFC form and it's much easier to find the ones you want when they are in a predictable sequence. As an extension to this it would be great if they could be sorted by the last part of their real name - typical user, give him a sweetie and he wants jam on it!
cheers
Steve
|
That's a bit hard since different groups enter their names differently. While for a human it's easy to figure out what the family name is (usually), this must not be true for a computer. So I would propose that you enter the real names in the sequence family name, given name like
Ritt, Stefan
Doe, John
then sorting will work as you like.
|
Good point! However, the current sorting appears to be done on email address rather than name. Having the option to sort on name, where we are in control of the format so could structure it accordingly, would be great.
regards
Steve
|