Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 103 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  984   Tue Mar 15 14:11:48 2005 Reply Alex Halex@synergie-inf.comQuestionWindows2.5.7-1Re: Non clickable column
> > I talk about the column contents. In fact on ELOG, we store password so its 
> > more easyer to click twice on it to select them and after to copy them instead 
> > of select from right to left the password and to try to copy them. The HMTL 
> > link gave problem, its more hard to copy data from HTML link than an normal TXT.
> > A little hard to explain sorry for my mistakes and explication I'm French :o).
> 
> I added a new option "Link display = ...", with which you can restrict the number of
> attribues which gets a HTML link. If you put
> 
> Link display = ID, Author
> 
> then only the ID column and the colum with the Author are shown as HTML links, all
> other are shown as simple text.
> 
> The new version is under CVS. This option will be included in the next release.

Great news :) !
thanks a lot !
  987   Wed Mar 16 22:14:19 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
> There is a read password ("Read Password=..." entry in elogd.cfg) on
> the logbook which I cannot bypass from the client.

This is correct. The elog utility works with write passwords and user level access
(specifying a password file), but not with read passwords, that's not implemented. Use a
password file and you should be fine.

> There is a required attribute called "Publiek", and it's defined as
> MOptions. Whenever I try to upload, I keep getting the message that 
> it misses this attribute.

Your problem is that you try to combine a MOptions with a "-r <n>" (reply-to) option. I
have never tried that and found there is a problem. I changed the way MOptions are
submitted. Instead of using <name>_0, <name>_1 etc, you can now do a 

-a "<attrib>=<value1> | <value2>"

This also solves the problem with the "-r" option. You have to upgrade elogd.c from CVS.
  989   Thu Mar 17 10:02:45 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
> On a side note, one would expect that when "Fixed Attributes Edit" or "Fixed Attributes
> Reply" is set, the attributes in this list shouldn't be supplied with the command line client.

Well, don't shoot yourself in the foot! The communication between elog and elogd is limited. elog
more or less submits "blindly" whatever you give it on the command line. If "Fixed Attributes
Edit/Reply" is set in the configuration, this only affects the web page with the entry form, so
these attributes are not shown as edit boxes. They are not checked during submission by elogd. Now
to get the same functionality with elog, elog whould have to retrieve the full entry form, analyze
the HTML code, find out which attributes have edit boxes and which ones not. So that's a lot of
work. Since most people use elog in scripts, they set it up once and forever correctly. There are
actually a few people which even want the functionality that elog can change attributes which are
normally fixed.

- Stefan
  990   Thu Mar 17 23:06:54 2005 Reply Pieter Edelmanelog@pde.slimblondje.nlQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
Okidokie. May I then humbly suggest to mention this in the documentation of the elog command client?
  991   Fri Mar 18 08:02:52 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
> Okidokie. May I then humbly suggest to mention this in the documentation of the elog command client?

I did modify it already, see http://midas.psi.ch/elog/userguide.html at the bottom.
  992   Fri Mar 18 10:41:39 2005 Reply Paul Harringtonpaul.harrington@oup.comQuestionWindows2.5.2Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line
> > Is there any way to configure elog so that attribute fields can be edited 
> > on more than line like the 'text' field? 
> > 
> > (This would be useful so that attributes could contain larger portions of 
> > text including line breaks)
> 
> No, but this request is already on the wishlist
> (http://midas.psi.ch/elog/wishlist.html) since some time. I added your vote.

Stefan,

Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are 
they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do 
in the future?

many thanks

Paul
  993   Fri Mar 18 10:54:36 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.5.2Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line
> Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are 
> they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do 
> in the future?

In order to have multi-line attributes, the whole format of the logbooks has to be
changed. I plan to use XML for the logbook format in the future. We would not have
any more one file per day, but one big file per logbook. I have already some XML
functionality in elog, but this one requires a major rewrite of the whole code. On
the other hand, searching etc. will become much faster afterwards. I plan to start
this development soon, but it might take quite some time, so don't expect it
before summer or fall.

Best regards,

  Stefan
  994   Fri Mar 18 11:06:11 2005 Reply Paul Harringtonpaul.harrington@oup.comQuestionWindows2.5.2Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line
> > Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are 
> > they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do 
> > in the future?
> 
> In order to have multi-line attributes, the whole format of the logbooks has to be
> changed. I plan to use XML for the logbook format in the future. We would not have
> any more one file per day, but one big file per logbook. I have already some XML
> functionality in elog, but this one requires a major rewrite of the whole code. On
> the other hand, searching etc. will become much faster afterwards. I plan to start
> this development soon, but it might take quite some time, so don't expect it
> before summer or fall.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>   Stefan

Thanks for your help, thats useful to know.

Paul
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6