I want exchange the logs as files and not with the mirroring function. My 
collegue and me are already exchanging all our project files, so the logs from 
ELOG could be included in this exchange.

> I want exchange the logs as files and not with the mirroring function. My 
> collegue and me are already exchanging all our project files, so the logs from 
> ELOG could be included in this exchange.

If you do not want to use the mirroring, then you can extract a single entry with
the "hidden" download command. Like for this entry:

http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1039?cmd=Download

Tell your browser to save the result locally and you have a file with just this
message. Note however that if you ship these files around, and combine them with an
existing logbook by copying them to the logbook directory, you could have two
entries with the same ID, in which case elogd would produce unpredictable results.

> > Here is my elogd.cfg.
> > I hope this will help you :)
> 
> Yes it did. You were the first one using an attribute containing a dot inside a
> required attribute ("Maint."). This crashed JavaScript. I found a workaround and
> implemented it.
> 
> > when we be released the next elog version who correct the crash of Protect 
> > Selection page = 1 ?
> 
> I just release 2.5.8-2 which contains both fixes.

Hi,
I've change my Attribute "Maint." to "Maint" in my elogd.cfg and in my Logbook too 
but the problem is the same, I have restarted the service but the problem is still 
here. Any idea? o_O

> I've change my Attribute "Maint." to "Maint" in my elogd.cfg and in my Logbook too 
> but the problem is the same, I have restarted the service but the problem is still 
> here. Any idea? o_O

Have you upgraded to 2.5.8-2 ? After the upgrade, "Maint." (with the dot) should also work.

> > I've change my Attribute "Maint." to "Maint" in my elogd.cfg and in my 
Logbook too 
> > but the problem is the same, I have restarted the service but the 
problem is still 
> > here. Any idea? o_O
> 
> Have you upgraded to 2.5.8-2 ? After the upgrade, "Maint." (with the dot) 
should also work.

Yes I have upgraded Elog to 2.5.8-2.
I submit my new elogd.cfg file maybe it will help you.
I have try the preset text under Firefox (the last), avant browser 10.0 
(build 165) and IE 6 SP1.

Thanks for help :o)

> Yes I have upgraded Elog to 2.5.8-2.
> I submit my new elogd.cfg file maybe it will help you.
> I have try the preset text under Firefox (the last), avant browser 10.0 
> (build 165) and IE 6 SP1.

I tested your config file under Firefox (the last) and it worked fine. On the
"Liste Routeurs & Firewall", I click "New", then select FWL1, then see the text
"FLW1.txt" in the main body. I don't have that file, so elog by default just
shows the file name.

I also realized that you have double entries in your config file (like two
"Attributes = " and "Options Type = " lines. However this should not be a
problem, elog just chooses the first one.

If your preset text does not work, it could be that you have switched off
JavaScript. In Firefow, you can open the JavaScript console (Tools/JavaScript
console). Maybe you see any error there.

- Stefan

> The idea is good, but it does not work for me. What happens when I do this is
> that I get a new ID, but the old ID is deleted.... It disappears from the list,
> and if you try to access it manually it says that it is deleted.

Right, that how it's supposed to be. Same would happen if you move the entry. It's
deleted from the old place and resubmitted as a new entry. Otherwise you would have
your entry twice, and that is certainly not what you want. How come you access it
manually? If you access it through the list, everything should be fine. I even
update the references if there are replies to this entry, so the replies still
point to the right entry.

> > The idea is good, but it does not work for me. What happens when I do this is
> > that I get a new ID, but the old ID is deleted.... It disappears from the list,
> > and if you try to access it manually it says that it is deleted.
> 
> Right, that how it's supposed to be. Same would happen if you move the entry. It's
> deleted from the old place and resubmitted as a new entry. Otherwise you would have
> your entry twice, and that is certainly not what you want. How come you access it
> manually? If you access it through the list, everything should be fine. I even
> update the references if there are replies to this entry, so the replies still
> point to the right entry.

But I want a duplicate entry of the entry.... so that I can reuse the text and other
items and just change the entrys that need to be changed.

E.g, you have a work request from one user with some kind of solution on it, then you
get a similar request from another user and you want to have almost the same
information in a new entry. Then you just want to create a copy of the old case and
change whatever needs to be changed.

I'm not sure if you understand what I tries to do?


Best regards
Michael