| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1146
|
Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? | > [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/adminguide.html
> ...
> mxml/
> mxml/mxml.c
> mxml/strlcpy.c
> mxml/mxml.h
> mxml/strlcpy.h
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ cd elog-2.5.9
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$ make
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elog src/elog.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o regex.o src/regex.c
> ... skipping warnings ...
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o mxml.o ../mxml/mxml.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o strlcpy.o ../mxml/strlcpy.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -I../mxml -o elogd src/elogd.c regex.o
> mxml.o strlcpy.o
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elconv src/elconv.c
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$
>
> --------------
> No undefined functions here. I guess you have an old Makefile? Just use the complete tar
> package from the last version.
Ok, now I have it. Old Makefile because I had to perform some deletions to make "make" work
right under Solaris. Basically, I took out the ifdef structures - "make" was blowing up on
these. Everything now compiles perfectly -- don't change anything. Thanks for that last pointer.
Steve |
|
1149
|
Tue May 17 21:38:36 2005 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.5.9 | Logbook locking issue | Stefan, any ideas on this problem?
| Quote: | Our eLog is set to create logbook entry locks and after 30minutes prevent one from re-editing an entry, thus forcing a REPLY to be created.
SCENARIO: When an *attempt* is made to edit a logbook after the 30minute timer, one gets the message that EDITING is prevented and to use the browser "Back" button.
PROBLEM: The display now shows that particular entry to be locked, even though the attempt to edit was blocked. It appears that the lock flag is set prior to the "Edit" attempt being blocked and thus the lock flag is never "unset". |
|
|
1165
|
Wed Jun 1 16:14:22 2005 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.5.9 | Re: Logbook locking issue |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Stefan, any ideas on this problem?
| Quote: | Our eLog is set to create logbook entry locks and after 30minutes prevent one from re-editing an entry, thus forcing a REPLY to be created.
SCENARIO: When an *attempt* is made to edit a logbook after the 30minute timer, one gets the message that EDITING is prevented and to use the browser "Back" button.
PROBLEM: The display now shows that particular entry to be locked, even though the attempt to edit was blocked. It appears that the lock flag is set prior to the "Edit" attempt being blocked and thus the lock flag is never "unset". |
|
Hmmm, I don't seem to be seeing any responses - is email being generated? |
|
1167
|
Wed Jun 1 21:00:01 2005 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.5.9 | Re: Logbook locking issue |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Stefan, not a problem. ITMT, any idea how I can manually clear this "lock"? Is it embedded in the logbook itself?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | Sorry about my unusual slow response, but I'm pretty busy these days. I hope I will be able to address this problem in a two weeks from now.
| Steve Jones wrote: | Stefan, any ideas on this problem?
| Quote: | Our eLog is set to create logbook entry locks and after 30minutes prevent one from re-editing an entry, thus forcing a REPLY to be created.
SCENARIO: When an *attempt* is made to edit a logbook after the 30minute timer, one gets the message that EDITING is prevented and to use the browser "Back" button.
PROBLEM: The display now shows that particular entry to be locked, even though the attempt to edit was blocked. It appears that the lock flag is set prior to the "Edit" attempt being blocked and thus the lock flag is never "unset". |
|
|
|
|
1655
|
Mon Feb 6 16:44:46 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Angus Au wrote: | | ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found |
The util library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the forkpty() function call. If you know in which library the forkpty is available on solaris, the makefile could be adjusted accordingly. If the forkpty is not available at all, we have to disable the shell substitution under solaris via conditional compilation. |
| Steve Jones wrote: | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?
-- Ah, just looked at the docs, I see what that buys us. Surely there is a similar function available that is cross platform?
|
|
|
1664
|
Wed Feb 8 18:19:02 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Yep, I saw it. Thanks |
|
|
1665
|
Wed Feb 8 18:23:52 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Work on PAM Support? | Stefan (or any others):
Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking at sample code.
Thanks
Steve |
|
1666
|
Wed Feb 8 18:34:43 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Yep, I saw it. Thanks |
|
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. The URL is http://www.developerweb.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2990.
Perhaps this can be used unless someone comes up with a Solaris "util" library.
#ifdef SOLARIS /* Use the code in my_forkpty.c */
int my_forkpty (int *amaster, char *name, void *unused1, void *unused2);
#define forkpty my_forkpty
#endif
-----------------------
my_forkpty.c
-----------------------
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/stream.h>
#include <sys/stropts.h>
/* fork_pty() remplacement for Solaris.
* This ignore the last two arguments
* for the moment
*/
int
my_forkpty (int *amaster,
char *name,
void *unused1,
void *unused2)
{
int master, slave;
char *slave_name;
pid_t pid;
master = open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR);
if (master < 0)
return -1;
if (grantpt (master) < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (unlockpt (master) < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
slave_name = ptsname (master);
if (slave_name == NULL)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
slave = open (slave_name, O_RDWR);
if (slave < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (ioctl (slave, I_PUSH, "ptem") < 0
|| ioctl (slave, I_PUSH, "ldterm") < 0)
{
close (slave);
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (amaster)
*amaster = master;
if (name)
strcpy (name, slave_name);
pid = fork ();
switch (pid)
{
case -1: /* Error */
return -1;
case 0: /* Child */
close (master);
dup2 (slave, STDIN_FILENO);
dup2 (slave, STDOUT_FILENO);
dup2 (slave, STDERR_FILENO);
return 0;
default: /* Parent */
close (slave);
return pid;
}
return -1;
}
|
|
|
|
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6 |