Elog v2.7.8 does not show substituted attributes while editing or replying, posted by Dennis Seitz on Thu Aug 19 22:58:45 2010
|
Since we updated to 2.7.8 we've found a problem.
Previously, when we used
Subst on reply subject = Re: $subject
The new "Re: " text would appear in the "subject" field while the user was editing their reply, and they could edit or delete it.
Since 2.7.8, however, it does not appear while editing, but shows up only after the user submits their entry. We would prefer that this appears while the user is editing, because in some cases we want the users to have the option to modify this text. Was this intentional? Is there a way to restore the previous functionality?
Thank you! |
Re: Elog v2.7.8 does not show substituted attributes while editing or replying, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Sep 3 14:25:37 2010
|
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Since we updated to 2.7.8 we've found a problem.
Previously, when we used
Subst on reply subject = Re: $subject
The new "Re: " text would appear in the "subject" field while the user was editing their reply, and they could edit or delete it.
Since 2.7.8, however, it does not appear while editing, but shows up only after the user submits their entry. We would prefer that this appears while the user is editing, because in some cases we want the users to have the option to modify this text. Was this intentional? Is there a way to restore the previous functionality?[...]
|
Sorry, that appears to be an undocumented bug fix :-)
The desired behaviour should be created by
Preset on reply subject = Re: $subject
The command "Subst" is supposed to overwrite the field after it is submitted.
From the documentation you will even find a nicer possibility:
Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
The prevent replies to build a long chain of "Re: Re: Re: ...."
Cheers Andreas |
elog editor loses all text, posted by Kontantin Olchanski on Wed Aug 4 23:46:34 2010
|
I just typed a long text into this elog, clicked "submit" and it bombed with "you must select an Icon", returned me to the editor with all my text gone gone gone. I do not want to select icons, I just want to report a problem with elog. Well, 2 problems, now.
K.O.
|
Re: elog editor loses all text, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 6 13:01:24 2010
|
Kontantin Olchanski wrote: |
I just typed a long text into this elog, clicked "submit" and it bombed with "you must select an Icon", returned me to the editor with all my text gone gone gone. I do not want to select icons, I just want to report a problem with elog. Well, 2 problems, now.
K.O.
|
Well, first RTFM: "Fields marked with a * are required" on top of the elog entry page. Then, use a reasonable browser on a reasonable OS
On Google Chrome the text is still there (actually I just tried it with this entry). No idea what Safari under OSX does. Under Windows, Safari keeps the text. Actually this is controlled by the FCKEditor inside elog which is written by someone else. So complain there! Funny: We have about 1000+ entries in this forum, and you are the first one complaining about this. |
elog keeps recreating preview .png files?, posted by Kontantin Olchanski on Wed Aug 4 23:52:08 2010
|
Hi, I rsync an elog database from CERN to TRIUMF every few months and I notice that rsync keeps copying preview files (xxx.png.png, xxx.gif.png, etc) from very old entries. I guess that elogd creates these files from scratch each time they are needed, overwriting any previously existing preview files. This creates extra rsync network traffic and rsync takes longer to complete. Is there any way to avoid this? K.O.
|
Re: elog keeps recreating preview .png files?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 6 12:55:08 2010
|
Kontantin Olchanski wrote: |
Hi, I rsync an elog database from CERN to TRIUMF every few months and I notice that rsync keeps copying preview files (xxx.png.png, xxx.gif.png, etc) from very old entries. I guess that elogd creates these files from scratch each time they are needed, overwriting any previously existing preview files. This creates extra rsync network traffic and rsync takes longer to complete. Is there any way to avoid this? K.O.
|
Actually the thumbnail files are only created if they are not there. This is done in the function crate_thumbnail():
i = get_thumb_name(file_name, str, sizeof(str), 0);
if (i)
return i;
So if these files are recreated always, something must be wrong there. Or you sysadmin runs a cron job which deletes them every evening  |
Important security update of ELOG, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 2 13:40:02 2010
|
Dear ELOG users,
this is to announce an important security update. As proposed by Lukasz Olejnik (CERN/PSNC), ELOG has now switched to strong encryption of password. So everybody concerned in security is advised to update to the new version 2.8.0. Existing password files for Windows users and Linux users not using HAVE_CRYPT are automatically converted. Those installations which used HAVE_CRYPT in the past under Linux have to ask their users to re-enter their password (via the link "Forgot password") after the upgrade to version 2.8.0.
Best regards,
Stefan Ritt |
Re: Important security update of ELOG, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 5 12:26:12 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dear ELOG users,
this is to announce an important security update. As proposed by Lukasz Olejnik (CERN/PSNC), ELOG has now switched to strong encryption of password. So everybody concerned in security is advised to update to the new version 2.8.0. Existing password files for Windows users and Linux users not using HAVE_CRYPT are automatically converted. Those installations which used HAVE_CRYPT in the past under Linux have to ask their users to re-enter their password (via the link "Forgot password") after the upgrade to version 2.8.0.
Best regards,
Stefan Ritt
|
I just realized that the command line elog utility did not yet use the new encryption. So automatic elog submissions using passwords are broken in version 2.8.0. I made an intermediate version 2.8.0-2 which fixes that. However you only need to update it if you use the elog utility and have problems with the 2.8.0 version. |
Subst variables and Execute, posted by soren poulsen on Wed Jul 21 16:26:17 2010
|
Hi
I am trying to use this line from the documentation:
Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log
It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)
How can I make this line work ?
Soren
|
Re: Subst variables and Execute, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 21 16:38:05 2010
|
soren poulsen wrote: |
Hi
I am trying to use this line from the documentation:
Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log
It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)
How can I make this line work ?
Soren
|
Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation? |
Re: Subst variables and Execute, posted by soren poulsen on Thu Jul 22 10:17:29 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote: |
Hi
I am trying to use this line from the documentation:
Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log
It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)
How can I make this line work ?
Soren
|
Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation?
|
Thanks a lot for replying despite the heat. Yes, I executed with the "-x" flag.
It is just a quoting problem, I guess. This line works:
Execute new = echo New message with ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host >> /tmp/elog.log
It evaluates to:
SHELL "echo New message with ID 24706 of type elogtype from Soren Poulsen on 137.138.22.11 >> /tmp/elog.log"
So next step is to replace "new" with "edit" and "delete".
That works as well.
Soren
|
Re: Subst variables and Execute, posted by soren poulsen on Mon Jul 26 11:41:44 2010
|
soren poulsen wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote: |
Hi
I am trying to use this line from the documentation:
Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log
It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)
How can I make this line work ?
Soren
|
Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation?
|
Thanks a lot for replying despite the heat. Yes, I executed with the "-x" flag.
It is just a quoting problem, I guess. This line works:
Execute new = echo New message with ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host >> /tmp/elog.log
It evaluates to:
SHELL "echo New message with ID 24706 of type elogtype from Soren Poulsen on 137.138.22.11 >> /tmp/elog.log"
So next step is to replace "new" with "edit" and "delete".
That works as well.
Soren
|
There is sometimes a problem with substitutions like "Execute delete = echo $message id".
It seems the problem is that if you delete a logbook entry that is not created with the current logbook attributes, the substitution variables are replaced with the variable name, and not the variable value.
In this example, according to the log file it becomes SHELL "message id" instead of SHELL "234", if the logbook entry is 234.
Soren |
Re: Subst variables and Execute, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 28 17:08:55 2010
|
soren poulsen wrote: |
There is sometimes a problem with substitutions like "Execute delete = echo $message id".
It seems the problem is that if you delete a logbook entry that is not created with the current logbook attributes, the substitution variables are replaced with the variable name, and not the variable value.
In this example, according to the log file it becomes SHELL "message id" instead of SHELL "234", if the logbook entry is 234.
Soren
|
I tried to reproduce it, but it always worked for me. So I need a step-by-step instruction from you on how to reproduce the problem, ideally starting from the demo logbook from the distribution. Only if I can reproduce the problem, I will be able to fix it. |
Re: Subst variables and Execute, posted by soren poulsen on Thu Jul 29 13:45:47 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote: |
There is sometimes a problem with substitutions like "Execute delete = echo $message id".
It seems the problem is that if you delete a logbook entry that is not created with the current logbook attributes, the substitution variables are replaced with the variable name, and not the variable value.
In this example, according to the log file it becomes SHELL "message id" instead of SHELL "234", if the logbook entry is 234.
Soren
|
I tried to reproduce it, but it always worked for me. So I need a step-by-step instruction from you on how to reproduce the problem, ideally starting from the demo logbook from the distribution. Only if I can reproduce the problem, I will be able to fix it.
|
It is of course my job to reproduce it (and explain how-to). Thanks for your consideration. |
alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Wed Aug 5 19:05:01 2009
|
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 6 08:00:22 2009
|
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Fri Aug 7 23:09:42 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 10 17:14:48 2009
|
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision. |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Thu Jun 3 06:14:50 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D? |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 8 09:53:09 2010
|
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8. |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Wed Jul 28 17:01:06 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8.
|
We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you? |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 28 17:15:33 2010
|
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8.
|
We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?
|
Sorry, there was a typo, you need
Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1
where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all). |
Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Wed Jul 28 22:03:26 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision.
|
I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?
Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
|
You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8.
|
We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?
|
Sorry, there was a typo, you need
Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1
where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all).
|
That did the trick. That was a good idea, to give us the option of which attributes to sort, too. Thanks again for adding this feature! |
Disable forward/backward navigation keystrokes?, posted by Bryan Moffit on Wed Jul 28 17:21:31 2010
|
I wondered if there was a config line that enabled/disabled the forward and backward navigation keystrokes that were implemented in 2.7.0?
The current definitions (Control-PgUp/PgDown/Home/End) interfere with those keys I use to navigate between tabs in Firefox. It'd be nice if they could either be turned off.. or redefined. |
Re: Disable forward/backward navigation keystrokes?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 28 17:26:17 2010
|
Bryan Moffit wrote: |
I wondered if there was a config line that enabled/disabled the forward and backward navigation keystrokes that were implemented in 2.7.0?
The current definitions (Control-PgUp/PgDown/Home/End) interfere with those keys I use to navigate between tabs in Firefox. It'd be nice if they could either be turned off.. or redefined.
|
They are defined in
<ELOG directory>\scripts\elcode.js
Just go to the browse(evt) function and redefine or remove them there. |
Re: Disable forward/backward navigation keystrokes?, posted by Bryan Moffit on Wed Jul 28 17:32:15 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Bryan Moffit wrote: |
I wondered if there was a config line that enabled/disabled the forward and backward navigation keystrokes that were implemented in 2.7.0?
The current definitions (Control-PgUp/PgDown/Home/End) interfere with those keys I use to navigate between tabs in Firefox. It'd be nice if they could either be turned off.. or redefined.
|
They are defined in
<ELOG directory>\scripts\elcode.js
Just go to the browse(evt) function and redefine or remove them there.
|
Got it to work as desired.
Thanks for your help and your quick response. |
What *exactly* do "clone" and "mirror" do?, posted by David McKee on Thu Jul 22 00:31:54 2010
|
We have been hosting logbook far (geographically and in internet hops) from our experimental site. Recently we have (finally!) gotten reliable on-site internet, and would like to host the log book on-site.
I have a suspicion that some combination of the -C, -m, and -M flags will allow me to migrate the logbook automagically and with a minimum risk of trouble from concurrent operation on the logbook, and to maintain the existing version as a mirror of the new official on-site version. But documentation is not being very helpful. Can someone say a few more words about what these options do?
I've been experimenting as I compose this and have a suggestion for language that might be useful somewhere in the documentation:
In this context "to clone" means to copy the configuration file and all data files associated with a log book so that I can host an identical logbook on a new host (that is this is the command to migrate a logbook). After cloning the two installation are identical, but no effort is made to keep them so: if you continue to run both copies post made to one will not be reflected in the other.
Is this correct?
I'm still not clear on what the -m and -M options do. |
Re: What *exactly* do "clone" and "mirror" do?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 28 16:55:32 2010
|
David McKee wrote: |
We have been hosting logbook far (geographically and in internet hops) from our experimental site. Recently we have (finally!) gotten reliable on-site internet, and would like to host the log book on-site.
I have a suspicion that some combination of the -C, -m, and -M flags will allow me to migrate the logbook automagically and with a minimum risk of trouble from concurrent operation on the logbook, and to maintain the existing version as a mirror of the new official on-site version. But documentation is not being very helpful. Can someone say a few more words about what these options do?
I've been experimenting as I compose this and have a suggestion for language that might be useful somewhere in the documentation:
In this context "to clone" means to copy the configuration file and all data files associated with a log book so that I can host an identical logbook on a new host (that is this is the command to migrate a logbook). After cloning the two installation are identical, but no effort is made to keep them so: if you continue to run both copies post made to one will not be reflected in the other.
Is this correct?
I'm still not clear on what the -m and -M options do.
|
Yes this is correct. But actually you do not necessarily need that. If you want to migrate a logbook to another server, you can just copy over the elog directory containing the configuration file and the logbooks. That's it. Mirroring now means manually triggered or periodic synchronization between two servers to keep the logbooks in sync. Like if an entry is entered on one server, it gets copied over to the other server automatically. That works in both directions. The periodic mirroring can be done using the options "Mirror server" and "Mirror cron" in the configuration files. It can be manually triggered using the "-m" and "-M" flags. But I guess in your case it's enough to copy over the elog tree just once. |
|