Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 117 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries    6454 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 116, 117, 118 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  1708   Tue Feb 21 22:37:14 2006 Smile Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1Re: svn revision number in the source

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
I have no idea how I got to CVS


I realized that I had an old link to CVS when I checked your previous posting, so I updated that link like 30 min ago. That's why you got a new one.


Ah, thanks. All is now right with the world Big grin
  2060   Thu Nov 9 22:40:06 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux2.6.1Re: suggestion for "new user registration" page

Mark Bergman wrote:
Suggestions for improving the registration page:

Put a "submit" button after the password entry.

Possibly supress the local "bottom text", or allow the specification of a different file for the registration page.

After the user has registered, then show a page allowing them to subscribe for e-mail notifcation. That page should be organized the same way as the main page, with groups. Users should be allowed to subscribe to entire groups, or to expand each group to select or unsubscribe from individual logbooks.

Thanks,

Mark


I put the "save" button below the password entry and removed the "bottom text", I hope this helps a bit.
  2170   Mon Mar 19 19:51:26 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows6.4-1802Re: submit modified elog entry

deletoille wrote:
hello, I have small a bug,
when I create an entry. Per moment the program requires of me: "Submit modified Elog entry"
if I answer yes, Eog create 2 entry identical.
If I answer not it create only one.
I don't wait that elog asks me a confirmation


Are you sure about that? Can you reproduce it? I tried to reproduce it with the simple example logbook from the distribution, by adding the Use lock = 1 option to the configuration, but without success. I got only a single entry or no entry. You can of course remove the Use lock option, if you don't need locking.
  67971   Tue Jun 9 12:51:07 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxV3.1.0-241Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

I fixed both issues, now resubmitting an entry or submitting a new entry both yields "New LEOG entry".

Jacky Li wrote:

Hi,

I updated an old elog entry and resubmit it as new by checking the box resubmit as new.   Does the subject line should said it is a "New ELOG entry" instead of "Updated ELOG entry"?  Thank you.

Also when some people submit a new elog, the subject line is "Updated ELOG entry".  This is a bit odd.  I can't reproduce that bug when I did my test. 

Jacky 

 

  67978   Tue Jun 9 16:17:06 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I fixed both issues, now resubmitting an entry or submitting a new entry both yields "New LEOG entry".

Jacky Li wrote:

Hi,

I updated an old elog entry and resubmit it as new by checking the box resubmit as new.   Does the subject line should said it is a "New ELOG entry" instead of "Updated ELOG entry"?  Thank you.

Also when some people submit a new elog, the subject line is "Updated ELOG entry".  This is a bit odd.  I can't reproduce that bug when I did my test. 

Jacky 

 

 

  67979   Tue Jun 9 16:46:48 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."
  67980   Tue Jun 9 16:51:55 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi Stefan,

The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."

Thanks, David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

 

  67990   Tue Jun 9 22:31:59 2015 Reply Jacky Lizli@hawaii.eduQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi,

I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area.  Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there.  Thank you.

Jacky

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."

Thanks, David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

 

 

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 116, 117, 118 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6