ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68863
|
Wed Nov 28 09:26:11 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: French Language |
I just tried myself with the current version 3.1.4 and it worked for me flawlessly. Maybe you want to upgrade.
Stefan
Yanick Vachon wrote: |
Hi,
When i set Language = French in global config it works in french until i logout, after i can't login anymore, even if i enter my user and password i always stay at the login window, the only way to login again is to edit the Elogd.cfg file in Elog directory, remove the Language = french and save then i can login in and work normally in english version.
Thanks.
|
|
68862
|
Tue Nov 27 20:06:17 2018 |
| Yanick Vachon | yvachon@materiauxblanchet.ca | Bug report | Windows | 3.1.2 | French Language |
Hi,
When i set Language = French in global config it works in french until i logout, after i can't login anymore, even if i enter my user and password i always stay at the login window, the only way to login again is to edit the Elogd.cfg file in Elog directory, remove the Language = french and save then i can login in and work normally in english version.
Thanks. |
68861
|
Tue Nov 27 15:21:31 2018 |
| Yanick Vachon | yvachon@materiauxblanchet.ca | Request | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Need to change port 25 |
I Stefan, it works with the 587 port.

Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I believe Yanick means the SMTP port, not the port under which elogd is listening. The SMPT port is hard wired to 25, because port 587 was not yet defiend when I wrote that code. I can make this a variable, but only if it works. So Yanick can you test if port 587 accepts normal SMTP commands? We don't have such a new server at our lab and I cannot test it. Under Windows you can open a command prompt and telnet to the mail server:
telnet <server> 587
HELO test
MAIL FROM: test
your server should then reply with "220 ..." and "250 ..." messages. Once this works, I will implement the variable SMTP port.
Stefan
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global
The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote: |
Hi,
We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Attachment 1: Port_587.png
|
|
68860
|
Tue Nov 27 08:59:45 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Need to change port 25 |
I believe Yanick means the SMTP port, not the port under which elogd is listening. The SMPT port is hard wired to 25, because port 587 was not yet defiend when I wrote that code. I can make this a variable, but only if it works. So Yanick can you test if port 587 accepts normal SMTP commands? We don't have such a new server at our lab and I cannot test it. Under Windows you can open a command prompt and telnet to the mail server:
telnet <server> 587
HELO test
MAIL FROM: test
your server should then reply with "220 ..." and "250 ..." messages. Once this works, I will implement the variable SMTP port.
Stefan
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global
The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote: |
Hi,
We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?
Thanks
|
|
|
68859
|
Tue Nov 27 08:19:11 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Request | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Need to change port 25 |
This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global
The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote: |
Hi,
We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?
Thanks
|
|
68858
|
Mon Nov 26 17:32:31 2018 |
| Yanick Vachon | yvachon@materiauxblanchet.ca | Request | Windows | 3.1.2 | Need to change port 25 |
Hi,
We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?
Thanks |
68857
|
Mon Oct 29 14:26:28 2018 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | 3.1.3 | Re: Logfile not registering entry numbers? |
As a regular elog (ab)user, I have seen this behaviour from time to time. So far as I recall, the cause actually is that a normal entry is looking for the entry in the "Reply to" field of the normal entry in the yymmdda.log file. When that entry does not exist, then I see a duplicate line of an entry with entry "#0", in emboldened black type. I did have a screenshot, but cannot find it for now.
A quick (relative term, that) search usually finds the entry which references the missing "Reply to" line, and editing that, all is well. I'm not sure how this can happen, but it does. NB, I'm still on elog 2.9.2 so I don't know how the draft facility works and possibly enhances the possibility of this issue.
Note that this is different to the case (rather more frequent) where the entry in the "In reply to" field is missing. This causes elog to go into a continuous loop and only the strongest measures ("kill -9 xxxx in linux) will break this out. This can happen more frequently as if you delete a thread with a large number (>40?) of entries, elog crashes, but more importantly, hasn't finished the job. Clicking on the remenents of the thread (which are usually the later entries) causes the endless loop.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
It looks like you've found a bug in ELOG. I've checked my elog.log and see that all NEW entry lines show "#0".
I've looked into the code: the message is written before the new entry is submitted, and only then the entry ID is defined.
For new entries one would need to make the logging print line later - but that would blow up the code.
The message IDs are correct for saving drafts and editing entries. I'll discuss with Stefan if that should be fixed.
Andreas
Sergio Navarrete wrote: |
I have configured a logbook with the logfile on, but when a user replies to an entry the line logged goes
Date Time [User@IP] {Logbook} NEW entry #0
How can I make the #0 be the real entry number for the reply?
|
|
|
68856
|
Sat Oct 27 10:51:12 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | ELOG V3.1.2-bd7 | Re: messy code for chinese charactor |
Can you post a screenshot?
Wenhao Huang wrote: | The Chinese character appears messy code. The encoding way is the default utf-8. How can I solve this problem? |
|