multiple keyword search - regular expression, posted by Johannes Liegl on Wed Aug 19 11:49:37 2009
|
Dear Sirs,
searching for keywords regular expression becomes very long. Are there any other type easy multiple keyword search supported. For example
a keyword search like keyword1 & keyword2 results in different output than a keyword search like keyword2 & keyword1. A simple keyword search like |
Re: multiple keyword search - regular expression, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Sep 3 18:14:26 2009
|
Johannes Liegl wrote:
Dear Sirs, |
|
Re: multiple keyword search - regular expression, posted by Yoshio Imai on Fri Sep 4 13:59:19 2009
|
Maybe there is a simple way.
If I understand it correctly, the entries are accepted/rejected for inclusion in the search result list based on one call to [I]regexec[/I]. In order to
search for N keywords, you could replace this by a loop of N calls to [I]regexec[/I], and only accept the entry if all of them find a match. |
|
Re: multiple keyword search - regular expression, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Sep 4 14:07:31 2009
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]Maybe there is a simple way.
If I understand it correctly, the entries are accepted/rejected for inclusion in the search result list based on one call to [I]regexec[/I]. In order to
search for N keywords, you could replace this by a loop of N calls to [I]regexec[/I], and only accept the entry if all of them find a match.[/quote]
|
Fix text prevents user from editing text during creation, instead of just edit, posted by Allen on Mon Aug 24 21:47:14 2009
|
When we set Fix text = 1, according to the syntax, this should prevent users from modifying the text field during an edit, but it looks like it is blocking
access at both time of edit and creation, meaning you can never add anything to it. Is that the intended functionality? |
|
Re: Fix text prevents user from editing text during creation, instead of just edit, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Sep 4 09:48:55 2009
|
Allen wrote:
When we set Fix text = 1, according to the syntax, this should prevent users from modifying the text field during an edit, but it looks like |
|
Time Display Format, posted by james Goedsir on Tue Sep 1 04:15:57 2009
|
| My Time field is displayed i a 12 Hour format I would like to change it to 24 Hours, can someone advised how it can be done |
Re: Time Display Format, posted by james Goedsir on Wed Sep 2 09:39:20 2009
|
james Goedsir wrote:
My Time field is displayed i a 12 Hour format I would like to change it to 24 Hours, can someone |
|
fckeditor update, posted by Arno Teunisse on Tue Aug 25 21:08:51 2009
|
Hello
Just a few fckeditor related questions. How do elog versions and fckeditor versions relate. ?
Can I just drop another version of the fckeditor over an other version? What things should I consider when doing so ? |
|
Re: fckeditor update, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 31 11:22:20 2009
|
Arno Teunisse wrote:
Hello |
|
Multiple keyword search, posted by Yoichi Aso on Wed Jan 14 19:52:04 2009
|
Hi,
I have a question regarding how to perform a multiple-keyword search.
For example, when I want to find entries which contain two keywords "abc" and "def" in the body text but in an unknown order,
|
|
Re: Multiple keyword search, posted by Johannes Liegl on Wed Aug 19 11:54:52 2009
|
[quote="Yoichi Aso"]Hi,
I have a question regarding how to perform a multiple-keyword search.
For example, when I want to find entries which contain two keywords "abc" and "def" in the body text but in an unknown order,
|
|
Logbook Parser, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Aug 11 00:20:11 2009
|
We are exploring whether it's possible/feasible to import ELog logbooks into a another database for special purposes (plotting/statisical,
etc). Target database is TBD (perhaps Access).
Does anyone have or know of a logbook parser program? From cut/pasting into, for example, Excel, it does appear that the data fields are already |
|
Re: Logbook Parser, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 08:29:23 2009
|
Alan Grant wrote:
We are exploring whether it's possible/feasible to import ELog logbooks into a another |
|
Re: Logbook Parser, posted by Steve Williamson on Tue Aug 11 13:02:22 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Logbook Parser, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 13:25:48 2009
|
Steve Williamson wrote:
excuse my butting in ... I've found the exports useful in the past - however, is is possible to |
|
Re: Logbook Parser, posted by Steve Williamson on Wed Aug 12 14:40:52 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Logbook Parser, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Aug 11 16:25:28 2009
|
Steve Williamson wrote:
|
Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:07:15 2009
|
(For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)
I like this new feature, BUT
|
|
Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:19:50 2009
|
I've just noticed that it has also sorted another Option, which are selected as radio buttons. Again, this is a
list which has a natural - again, in this case, chronological - order.
|
|
Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 08:38:56 2009
|
Ok, that makes sense, so I changed it to
Sort Attribute Options Status = 1
|
|
Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Aug 11 10:07:08 2009
|
Thanks Stefan! Works great.
> Ok, that makes sense, so I changed it to
|
|
Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Aug 11 17:46:33 2009
|
Yes, many thanks, Stefan, from me, too! It's really great that you respond so quickly to requests and suggestions.
And thanks to David for the fine tuning, great suggestion.
|
|
List Option, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Aug 11 08:10:21 2009
|
Hello Stefan.
Currently this is defined as a maximum of 100 literals in the cfg file. I would like to see the option to reference an external
text file as input for this. |
|
Re: List Option, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 08:33:32 2009
|
Alan Grant wrote:
Currently this is defined as a maximum of 100 literals in the cfg file. I would like |