ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
68803
|
Fri May 18 08:04:37 2018 |
 | Pasti | arvzie1@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 3.1.3 | Enabling SSL | Hi all,
I'm following config guide and so far so good. The only issue I run into is when enabling SSL.
Guide says - One can replace this certificate and key with a real certificate to avoid browser pop-up windows warning about the self-signed certificate.
Can you please tell me a more details regards this part? I have acquired security certificate and replaced contents of SSL folder.
Now elogd.exe gets error 1067.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks! |
|
68802
|
Fri May 18 00:57:33 2018 |
 | Tom Roberts | tom.roberts@iit.edu | Bug report | Windows | latest | elogd service crashes after windows update | We have been using elog on Windows 10 for a long time. Today, after a Windows update, the elogd service started crashing (error 1067, unexpected termination). It ran fine just before the Windows update (which took > 1 hour, so it was a major one). Uninstalling and re-installing did not help, including replacing my elogd.cfg with the default. Installing on another PC (that also has this update) fails in the same way. I have a good backup of my logbook.
Any suggestions? |
|
68801
|
Wed May 16 02:20:24 2018 |
 | Xuan Wu | wux@ihep.ac.cn | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: about shiftcheck | That's true. Thanks for your explanation.
Cheers, Xuan
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
An attribute is similar to a variable. Do you know any programming language that allows to start a variable with a digit? I don't.
The solution is very obvious: start your attributes with a letter.
Cheers, Andreas
| Xuan Wu wrote: |
|
Hi all,
I try to implement a shift check list for our facility. The attributes called "a1, a2, b1, b2 etc" are used in original shiftcheck.html， However, we would like to use "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". So I try to change the name of checkbox in shiftcheck.html and the attributes in elogd.cfg file to "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". The elog web page can display the attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", but the checked value of "on" seems not working. And I have used wirshark to monitor the http package, the request message seems correct, but the service response seems can't deal with attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", so is there a way to work around?
|
|
|
|
68800
|
Tue May 15 10:35:32 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: about shiftcheck | An attribute is similar to a variable. Do you know any programming language that allows to start a variable with a digit? I don't.
The solution is very obvious: start your attributes with a letter.
Cheers, Andreas
| Xuan Wu wrote: |
|
Hi all,
I try to implement a shift check list for our facility. The attributes called "a1, a2, b1, b2 etc" are used in original shiftcheck.html， However, we would like to use "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". So I try to change the name of checkbox in shiftcheck.html and the attributes in elogd.cfg file to "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". The elog web page can display the attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", but the checked value of "on" seems not working. And I have used wirshark to monitor the http package, the request message seems correct, but the service response seems can't deal with attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", so is there a way to work around?
|
|
|
68799
|
Tue May 15 04:41:23 2018 |
| Xuan Wu | wux@ihep.ac.cn | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | about shiftcheck | Hi all,
I try to implement a shift check list for our facility. The attributes called "a1, a2, b1, b2 etc" are used in original shiftcheck.html， However, we would like to use "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". So I try to change the name of checkbox in shiftcheck.html and the attributes in elogd.cfg file to "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". The elog web page can display the attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", but the checked value of "on" seems not working. And I have used wirshark to monitor the http package, the request message seems correct, but the service response seems can't deal with attributes like "1.1, 1.2...", so is there a way to work around? |
| Attachment 1: shiftcheck1.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: shiftcheck2.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: shiftcheck3.png
|
|
|
68798
|
Tue May 8 16:17:28 2018 |
 | Joseph McKenna | joseph.mckenna@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | Thank you all for your kind responses. Please consider this thread resolved: no bug in elog
| Chris Rasmussen wrote: |
|
ah yes, that was a helpful clue. Our elogd.cfg file led me to a .js file which redefines the ID to the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX format and it indeed had a silly hard coded length of that string.
Since I am pretty sure this is our code, I think it is safe to say that this is not a bug in the elog
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
Well, in my example the ID link worked just fine.
There could be a string length limitation, but it could be as well the way you are creating the ID that is the source of the problem: I would need the part of your elogd.cfg that defines how you format your ID in order to try to reproduce your problem.
Cheers, Andreas
| Chris Rasmussen wrote: |
|
Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug report.
You are right, IDs greater than 10^5 are created no problem. The issue is with the internal elog link, in this case of the form elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX The link generated uses only the first 5 digits of the message ID, and therefore links to the wrong message. In the two attachments you can see our sequencer event number 100098, first displaying the message where all of the ID is displayed and secondly in "full" view of the elog front page. Here, the "ID" column contains a link with the string: elog:SequencerEvents/10009. Our problem is that we often use this string to paste into other elogs and generate a link to the sequencer event message. However, since the string uses too few digits, we end up with a link to the wrong message
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater than 100'000 (see attached picture), but that is not your problem, or is it?
Cheers, Andreas
| Joseph McKenna wrote: |
|
We have a possible bug with elog that the ID for an elog entry at over 99,999 entires reads as 10,000...
68792/1 Illistrates the problem, we use this ID often to cross reference from out datalog...
Is this a know bug we can find a fix for? We are using: elogd 2.9.2 built Jul 14 2015, 18:58:06 revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68797
|
Mon May 7 18:10:20 2018 |
| Chris Rasmussen | chris.rasmussen@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | ah yes, that was a helpful clue. Our elogd.cfg file led me to a .js file which redefines the ID to the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX format and it indeed had a silly hard coded length of that string.
Since I am pretty sure this is our code, I think it is safe to say that this is not a bug in the elog
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
Well, in my example the ID link worked just fine.
There could be a string length limitation, but it could be as well the way you are creating the ID that is the source of the problem: I would need the part of your elogd.cfg that defines how you format your ID in order to try to reproduce your problem.
Cheers, Andreas
| Chris Rasmussen wrote: |
|
Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug report.
You are right, IDs greater than 10^5 are created no problem. The issue is with the internal elog link, in this case of the form elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX The link generated uses only the first 5 digits of the message ID, and therefore links to the wrong message. In the two attachments you can see our sequencer event number 100098, first displaying the message where all of the ID is displayed and secondly in "full" view of the elog front page. Here, the "ID" column contains a link with the string: elog:SequencerEvents/10009. Our problem is that we often use this string to paste into other elogs and generate a link to the sequencer event message. However, since the string uses too few digits, we end up with a link to the wrong message
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater than 100'000 (see attached picture), but that is not your problem, or is it?
Cheers, Andreas
| Joseph McKenna wrote: |
|
We have a possible bug with elog that the ID for an elog entry at over 99,999 entires reads as 10,000...
68792/1 Illistrates the problem, we use this ID often to cross reference from out datalog...
Is this a know bug we can find a fix for? We are using: elogd 2.9.2 built Jul 14 2015, 18:58:06 revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
68796
|
Mon May 7 14:24:18 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | As Andreas said we have to reproduce the problem. What is special in your case is the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX. This is non-standard and must be created through your configuration of elog or by an external script. I just guess that you have something like
Preset ID = elog:SequencerEvents/#####
which causes elog to preset the ID with the above string. Can it be that you just put five hashmarks in the preset?
Stefan
| Chris Rasmussen wrote: |
|
Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug report.
You are right, IDs greater than 10^5 are created no problem. The issue is with the internal elog link, in this case of the form elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX The link generated uses only the first 5 digits of the message ID, and therefore links to the wrong message. In the two attachments you can see our sequencer event number 100098, first displaying the message where all of the ID is displayed and secondly in "full" view of the elog front page. Here, the "ID" column contains a link with the string: elog:SequencerEvents/10009. Our problem is that we often use this string to paste into other elogs and generate a link to the sequencer event message. However, since the string uses too few digits, we end up with a link to the wrong message
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater than 100'000 (see attached picture), but that is not your problem, or is it?
Cheers, Andreas
| Joseph McKenna wrote: |
|
We have a possible bug with elog that the ID for an elog entry at over 99,999 entires reads as 10,000...
68792/1 Illistrates the problem, we use this ID often to cross reference from out datalog...
Is this a know bug we can find a fix for? We are using: elogd 2.9.2 built Jul 14 2015, 18:58:06 revision
|
|
|
|
|