ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66688
|
Thu Jan 14 18:55:12 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: quick filter |
deletoille wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
deletoille wrote: |
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
I don't understand your questions. Can you please give an example.
|
Sorry for my english. In fact, i found the answer by myself. But I ll explain to you.
in attachement 1, a small part of our ELOG. When I choose FBT in the quick filter "groupe incriminé". Elog respond that there is no entrie found (attachement 2)
But, with the find function, when i select display full entries and FBT in "groupe incriminé", Elog show the entrie ( attachement 3).
I found the answer. In fact, Elog respond no entrie when threaded is selected. I have to choose Full or summary for that working.
sorry
Xavier
|
Actually what you report is a bug. The filtering does not work in threaded display mode, only in summary and full. I fixed that bug in the current SVN version, so if you download and compile it, you can give it a try. The fix will be contained in the next official release. |
66691
|
Mon Jan 18 02:14:01 2010 |
| Gabriele Sirri | sirri@bo.infn.it | Question | Windows | 2.7.8-2283 | Re: quick filter |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
deletoille wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
deletoille wrote: |
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
I don't understand your questions. Can you please give an example.
|
Sorry for my english. In fact, i found the answer by myself. But I ll explain to you.
in attachement 1, a small part of our ELOG. When I choose FBT in the quick filter "groupe incriminé". Elog respond that there is no entrie found (attachement 2)
But, with the find function, when i select display full entries and FBT in "groupe incriminé", Elog show the entrie ( attachement 3).
I found the answer. In fact, Elog respond no entrie when threaded is selected. I have to choose Full or summary for that working.
sorry
Xavier
|
Actually what you report is a bug. The filtering does not work in threaded display mode, only in summary and full. I fixed that bug in the current SVN version, so if you download and compile it, you can give it a try. The fix will be contained in the next official release.
|
Hello,
I gave it a try. See: https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66690
Gabriele
|
68172
|
Fri Oct 30 15:52:33 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: propogating messages through logbooks | > Hi there
>
> Okay so let me explain what im trying to do. I have a table in a logbook (lets call it home) that the user fills
> out. This information in the table is related to other logbooks (8 of them to be exact).
> I want to propogate information from the table in the home logbook into the other logbooks. To do this I used
> Execute new which runs my scripts. One of the scripts makes a call to the elog
> client to submit the message. The problem is that this call to elog client never finishes because its hanging
> waiting for the initial submit (one which triggered Execute new) to finish. The documentation
> explained that only one submit can be processed at a time so i expected whats happening at the moment.
>
> My question is are there any other ways to do what im trying to do?? In a nutshell how to propogate information
> from one logbook to another autonomously.
>
> Regards
> Kenzo
Hi Kenzo,
I think it would help me to understand your problem, if you would provide a minimal configuration file with two
logbooks.
There is no ELOG internal feature to propagate data from one logbook to another;
using a shell script is the only method I know.
But you could easily put your script into the background:
ELOG can handle multiple parallel request, by handling one request after the other.
Kind Regards, Andreas |
68174
|
Mon Nov 2 07:39:07 2015 |
| kenzo Abrahams | kenzoabrahams@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: propogating messages through logbooks |
> Hi Kenzo,
> I think it would help me to understand your problem, if you would provide a minimal configuration file with two
> logbooks.
>
> There is no ELOG internal feature to propagate data from one logbook to another;
> using a shell script is the only method I know.
> But you could easily put your script into the background:
> ELOG can handle multiple parallel request, by handling one request after the other.
>
> Kind Regards, Andreas
Hi Andreas
Im using python to do the scripting. Everything works fine until it comes to submitting the entry to my logbook.
The extractTable.py file is the one running the command to submit to elog.
I see now that im starting a subprocess in my python script (subprocess.call) and thats why its not finishing.
Could you perhaps suggest how I would go about doing this by putting my scripts in the
background? I might have to look at multiprocessing in python as well. The reason im using python is because im
doing alot of file processing as well. I do have to add that this method works perfectly when i just run the python
on its own. As soon as i run it by submiting an elog entrie from the browser it hangs on the subprocess.call method.
Regards, Kenzo |
68175
|
Mon Nov 2 08:37:06 2015 |
| kenzo Abrahams | kenzoabrahams@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: propogating messages through logbooks | >
> > Hi Kenzo,
> > I think it would help me to understand your problem, if you would provide a minimal configuration file with two
> > logbooks.
> >
> > There is no ELOG internal feature to propagate data from one logbook to another;
> > using a shell script is the only method I know.
> > But you could easily put your script into the background:
> > ELOG can handle multiple parallel request, by handling one request after the other.
> >
> > Kind Regards, Andreas
>
> Hi Andreas
>
> Im using python to do the scripting. Everything works fine until it comes to submitting the entry to my logbook.
> The extractTable.py file is the one running the command to submit to elog.
> I see now that im starting a subprocess in my python script (subprocess.call) and thats why its not finishing.
> Could you perhaps suggest how I would go about doing this by putting my scripts in the
> background? I might have to look at multiprocessing in python as well. The reason im using python is because im
> doing alot of file processing as well. I do have to add that this method works perfectly when i just run the python
> on its own. As soon as i run it by submiting an elog entrie from the browser it hangs on the subprocess.call method.
>
> Regards, Kenzo
Hi Andreas
I sorted my problem out, I had to use threading in python such that I can time the submissions to the elog server.
Everything works fine now. Thank you for the assistance.
Regards
Kenzo |
67165
|
Wed Jan 25 10:50:43 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Comment | All | 2.9.0 | Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE |
Christian Herzog wrote: |
[...] we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of course was to enable SSL/https. With http, all tested browsers work fine, but with https at least Google Chrome 16 and IE 9 do not get past the "unknown certificate" warning and I see "TCP connection broken" errors in the log file. Firefox however works fine. Same behavior on Linux, Mac and Windows (given the browser in question is available). elog server is running on Lucid.[...]
|
⇄
Detect language » English
If you want to use https you should know what a certificate is.
Certificates are used to encript the data, but at the same time they are used to identify the host.
ELOG is delivered with a self generated certificate.
This can be used to encript the data, but no certification authority knows this certificate, so nobody can guaratee that you are connected to the right host.
Most browsers will warn you, that nobody did and if you don't care you need to change the security settings of you browser to accept the connection anyway.
The proper way out of this is to buy a certificate from a certification authority. Or to switch off https. (See https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global SSL option) |
67166
|
Wed Jan 25 14:05:46 2012 |
| Christian Herzog | herzog@phys.ethz.ch | Comment | All | 2.9.0 | Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Christian Herzog wrote: |
[...] we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of course was to enable SSL/https. With http, all tested browsers work fine, but with https at least Google Chrome 16 and IE 9 do not get past the "unknown certificate" warning and I see "TCP connection broken" errors in the log file. Firefox however works fine. Same behavior on Linux, Mac and Windows (given the browser in question is available). elog server is running on Lucid.[...]
|
⇄
Detect language » English
If you want to use https you should know what a certificate is.
Certificates are used to encript the data, but at the same time they are used to identify the host.
ELOG is delivered with a self generated certificate.
This can be used to encript the data, but no certification authority knows this certificate, so nobody can guaratee that you are connected to the right host.
Most browsers will warn you, that nobody did and if you don't care you need to change the security settings of you browser to accept the connection anyway.
The proper way out of this is to buy a certificate from a certification authority. Or to switch off https. (See https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global SSL option)
|
we know about certificates, thank you 
The point is that it stops AFTER the point at which I tell the browser to accept the self-signed certificates. I now even got a CACert and the problem remains: FF works, Chrome and IE don't: https://phd-bkp-gw2.ethz.ch:8080/admin/
log says: TCP connection broken
thanks,
-Christian |
67167
|
Wed Jan 25 14:48:36 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Comment | All | 2.9.0 | Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE |
Christian Herzog wrote: |
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
[...] we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of course was to enable SSL/https. With http, all tested browsers work fine, but with https at least Google Chrome 16 and IE 9 do not get past the "unknown certificate" warning and I see "TCP connection broken" errors in the log file. Firefox however works fine. Same behavior on Linux, Mac and Windows (given the browser in question is available). elog server is running on Lucid.[...]
|
  ⇄
Detect language » English
[...] The proper way out of this is to buy a certificate from a certification authority. Or to switch off https. (See https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global SSL option)
|
we know about certificates, thank you 
The point is that it stops AFTER the point at which I tell the browser to accept the self-signed certificates. I now even got a CACert and the problem remains: FF works, Chrome and IE don't: https://phd-bkp-gw2.ethz.ch:8080/admin/
log says: TCP connection broken [...]
|
 ⇄
Detect language » English
Sorry that I was mis-interpreting your question 
Unfortunately I don't know what's wrong with your set-up. I can confirm that I cannot access your logbook with "konquerer", but can access it with "firefox". The "konquerer" (on Scientific Linux 5.7) just gets timed out.
But I can access other SSL/https ELOGs with the konquerer. The problem only occurs with your logbook!
Therefore I would think it is a particular problem of your installation. I have three ideas how to isolate the problem:
- first, I would try to change to the standard port 443. Just in case it is related to some firewall, etc. problem.
- second, I would try another operating system than Ubuntu Lucid. It should work of course with Ubuntu, but if it still doesn't work with the other operating system then many things are already ruled out.
- third, I would try to set-up an apache webserver in front of ELOG. We have it here just for safety reasons. ELOG runs then on some special port and apache connects to it with a reverse proxy.
The latter is a little bit of work (about a day) if you never set-up apache before. Therefore I would try the other two, first.
Good luck!
|
|