ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1380
|
Fri Aug 5 09:19:02 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | Linux | 2.5.9+r16 | Re: problem with list display attribute |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
John Habermann wrote: | I not sure if this has been found and fixed as I did find something to do with the list display attribute in the forums but wasn't sure if it was the same thing.
There seems to be a bug with the List Display attribute in that it drops the last attribute of the list. So in my example if I want to display the Subject in my list I have to add a dummy attribute after it otherwise the Subject will not be displayed. The comma after Subject is not enough, but all you have to do is to add 1 letter and then you will see the subject in List view. If you don't all I see is the Date and Author fields and then the Text field in my Summary view in the log book.
List Display = Date,Author,Subject,t
I am running elog 2.5.9+r1674-1 on Debian sarge. |
I tried with the current 2.6.0-beta3 and it worked fine. Can you send me your full elogd.cfg in order to reproduce the problem? |
it is the pippo bug...
it was fixed in revision 1.675, just the next he was using...
it is discussed in elog:1170 |
68780
|
Wed Apr 11 11:55:47 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: problem with chkeditor |
Can you post a picture here?
Andrea Mazzolari wrote: |
Hi All,
I just installed elog latest version. I can see that my chkeditor (HTML encoding) is pretty simplified with respect to the version i can see there. Why this ? For example, it does not offer the possibility to upload images.
Could you please help me ?
Thank you
Andrea
|
|
68784
|
Sat Apr 14 15:11:31 2018 |
| Andrea Mazzolari | andrea.mazzolari@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: problem with chkeditor |
If i try to upload an image here, i got the error "Image Source URL Is Missing"...
can you help me further ?
Best regards,
Andrea
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Can you post a picture here?
Andrea Mazzolari wrote: |
Hi All,
I just installed elog latest version. I can see that my chkeditor (HTML encoding) is pretty simplified with respect to the version i can see there. Why this ? For example, it does not offer the possibility to upload images.
Could you please help me ?
Thank you
Andrea
|
|
|
68787
|
Mon Apr 16 17:27:35 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: problem with chkeditor |
Yes, I can help with that: you've tried to put the picture into the text body. Try to make it a normal attachment, that'll work always.
Andrea Mazzolari wrote: |
If i try to upload an image here, i got the error "Image Source URL Is Missing"...
can you help me further ?
Best regards,
Andrea
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Can you post a picture here?
Andrea Mazzolari wrote: |
Hi All,
I just installed elog latest version. I can see that my chkeditor (HTML encoding) is pretty simplified with respect to the version i can see there. Why this ? For example, it does not offer the possibility to upload images.
Could you please help me ?
Thank you
Andrea
|
|
|
|
427
|
Fri Sep 5 17:19:11 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | 2.3.9. | Re: problem with boolean attributes |
> Boolean attributes were not displayed correctly in version 2.3.9.
> Patch is attached.
Yes, implemented, thank you. |
297
|
Tue Apr 22 17:21:36 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: problem with 20+ attachments |
> It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> added to the web page.
Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke! Well, we never
had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The
limit comes from
#define MAX_ATTACHMENTS 20
in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and
recompile. |
298
|
Tue Apr 22 17:34:52 2003 |
| Alexander ZVYAGIN | Alexander.Zviagine@cern.ch | Bug report | | | Re: problem with 20+ attachments |
> > It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> > more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> > added to the web page.
>
> Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke!
:) I wanted to post a message with ~200 attachments.
>Well, we never
> had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The
> limit comes from
>
> #define MAX_ATTACHMENTS 20
>
> in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and
> recompile.
Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.
BTW is there a tool to check the 'integrity' of a logbook? That all
attachments are in place, there are no dead files, etc. I perfectly
understand that it is not _highly_ desired or needed, but with the two last
problems (auto-removing of attached files and silent adding a new ones with
20+ attachments) I have doubts that our logbook in a good state. And we just
started to use it. And I am still so excited about it!! |
303
|
Tue Apr 22 20:24:03 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: problem with 20+ attachments |
> Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
> The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.
>
> BTW is there a tool to check the 'integrity' of a logbook? That all
> attachments are in place, there are no dead files, etc. I perfectly
> understand that it is not _highly_ desired or needed, but with the two last
> problems (auto-removing of attached files and silent adding a new ones with
> 20+ attachments) I have doubts that our logbook in a good state. And we
just
> started to use it. And I am still so excited about it!!
Actually my philosophy is not to cure symptoms of a problem, but fix the
source of it. The reply/attachment bug is fixed, and a warning about
exceeding the number of attachments will come soon.
About the integrity, there is no problem. As you might know, the xxxxxxa.log
files are plain text files. The line "Attachments: xxx" contains a simple
text list of all attachments. In the above case a few files might be missing
in that line, but they are present in the log directory. So in worst case
edit the xxxxxxa.log file manually, adding the file names, and maybe restart
elogd to rebuild the index properly. Otherwise there is no integrity problem. |