| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1577
|
Mon Jan 9 20:53:28 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.0 | Re: MS Fonts only in ELCode options? |
| T. Ribbrock wrote: | I'm just after installing 2.6.0 and marvelling at all the changes, especially ELCode (I was using 2.5.8 previously). However, I noticed that the "FONT" menu for ELCodes only offers Microsoft fonts  - something I usually avoid like hell when publishing web content, as I cannot rely on those being installed on the clients. As far as I can see there is no easy way to change this, short of patching the source - or is there?
I'd want to add at least options like "serif" and "sans-serif" and maybe some standard (Unix\?) fonts like "Helvetica". |
In revision 1593 I implemented a "Fonts = ..." option where you can specify a list of fonts to be shown on the list. I tried however the MS set of fonts on a Linux system, and found that the MS fonts got mapped to Unix fonts in a reasonable way. Even the Comic Sans MS font was avalilable. |
|
1580
|
Tue Jan 10 10:42:18 2006 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron@gmx.net | Question | Linux | 2.6.0 | Re: MS Fonts only in ELCode options? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
In revision 1593 I implemented a "Fonts = ..." option where you can specify a list of fonts to be shown on the list. I tried however the MS set of fonts on a Linux system, and found that the MS fonts got mapped to Unix fonts in a reasonable way. Even the Comic Sans MS font was avalilable. |
Very nice, thanks! Yes, vou're right, MS fonts have a chance of working on newer Linux distributions, but not on all and there are still older ones out there - never mind all those folks sitting behind some kind of Solaris/Sparc box or similar...  |
|
1581
|
Tue Jan 10 19:30:09 2006 |
| David Brody | dbrody@echo-inc.com | Question | | 2.5.8-2 | Re: Date imports from CSV incorrectly |
| David Brody wrote: | When I import from a CSV file, dates formatted as mm/dd/yy always get imported as 12/31/1969
Here are the parameters I am using for dates:
Attributes = Ticket #, Status, Assigned To, Status Date, Install Date, Category, Activity, Environment, Component, TstTrk
Type Status Date = date
Type Install Date = date
Date format = %A, %d %B, %Y
Preset Status Date = $date
Thanks!
DB |
Never mind. I figured it out! |
|
1583
|
Wed Jan 11 21:06:06 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0r1593 | Re: Page browsing links in Find mode broken |
| Thanks for reporting this bug, I fixed it in revision 1597. |
|
1584
|
Wed Jan 11 21:12:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.0beta5 | Re: Getting back from "Find" mode |
| Yoshio Imai wrote: | | Is there a more direct way to get back to the unfiltered list view than selecting an entry and go to "List" or using "Find" again and clicking on "Back"? |
Yes, just click on the logbook tab on the very top of the page. |
| Attachment 1: elog.gif
|
|
|
1586
|
Thu Jan 12 11:38:13 2006 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0r1597 | Side effects from debugging |
Addendum: in the Forum, I found a very strange effect: When deliberately highlighting an entry (http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/?id=1858), the Elog server no longer keeps the page partitioning, but displays ALL entries of the logbook. I don't know if these problems are related, but maybe you could check (we use the "Full" mode for the list view, in case that matters). I have tried to reproduce the problem with our logbook in threaded mode, but we don't seem to have this problem there.
Yoshio |
|
1587
|
Thu Jan 12 15:50:51 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0r1597 | Side effects from debugging |
| Both problems have been fixed in revision 1598. |
|
1588
|
Thu Jan 12 16:06:16 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Thread sort / display order |
| Michael Husbyn wrote: | Is there a way to choose the display order in threaded mode.
Eg:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
But the preferred sort order (not the ID) is something like this:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
Example of parameter perhaps:
Thread order = Field1, $id
Or is this something too difficult to implement? Or already there?
Best regards
Michael Husbyn |
In summary mode, you can sort by clicking on a column header. You will then see something like
http://.../?sort=Field1
in the address bar. If you now switch to threaded display, this vanishes of course, but you can put a
Start page = ?sort=Field1
into your config file. Use sort for ascending order, rsort for descending order. |