Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 153 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Collapse | Expand  Show only new entries    6451 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 152, 153, 154 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
    icon2.gif   Re: elog allows me to create user "blahblah ", posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Feb 6 16:27:45 2006 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote:
By the way, it is also possible to create a user that doesn't have a password! Shouldn't that be forbidden?


Well, some people want that!


Ok, fair enough. But maybe there could be an optional flag in the configuration that disables blank passwords... I wouldn't want some imposter to start entering stuff under the username of another user, so it would be nice if I could have some way of forcing them to have a password, even if it's a one-letter password.

Thanks,

Dimitris
    icon2.gif   Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Feb 6 16:44:46 2006 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Angus Au wrote:
ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found


The util library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the forkpty() function call. If you know in which library the forkpty is available on solaris, the makefile could be adjusted accordingly. If the forkpty is not available at all, we have to disable the shell substitution under solaris via conditional compilation.



Steve Jones wrote:
I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?

-- Ah, just looked at the docs, I see what that buys us. Surely there is a similar function available that is cross platform?
    icon2.gif   Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 16:48:17 2006 

Steve Jones wrote:
I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?


See the config manual and look for $shell
    icon2.gif   Re: elog allows me to create user "blahblah ", posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 16:53:41 2006 

Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote:
I wouldn't want some imposter to start entering stuff under the username of another user, so it would be nice if I could have some way of forcing them to have a password, even if it's a one-letter password.


Ok, I added an empty password check. If too many people will complain, I will make it a flag.
    icon2.gif   Re: sort after find, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 17:15:11 2006 

Willem Koster wrote:
Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query.


That worked some time ago, but did not work currently. So I fixed that in the current SVN version.
    icon2.gif   Re: Numbered lists get closed by </ul>, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 7 12:58:10 2006 

T. Ribbrock wrote:
I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):

  • Create a new entry
  • Create a numbered list:
    [LIST=1]
[*] 1st entry
[*] 2nd entry
[/LIST]
  • In the resulting HTML code, the closing statement of that list translates to </ul> instead of </ol>, causing the list to remain open and all following text to be intented by the list indentation. This gets worse when several such lists are used in one document. I'll include an example below.

Numbered list follows:

  1. one
  2. two
  3. three

This text is indented, as the list was not closed properly.

  1. four
  2. five
  3. six

And now we have double indention...


I can't see any double indention there...

But seriously Wink I fixed that problem and updated this elog server already. It's in SVN revison 1653. The code now correctly chooses the proper </ul> or </ol>. What will not work however are nested lists, like an ordered list inside an unordere list, but that's anyhow very uncommon.
    icon2.gif   Re: Problem with MOptions , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 11:56:02 2006 

Ulrich Trüssel wrote:
After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:

MOptions Test = Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd, Ee, Ff, Gg

Selecting: Bb, Cc, Gg

Submitting the entry form, autoreturn to the overview of the even made entry, only Bb was taken.

Any Idea what's happen? Did I miss something changing in 2.6.1-1 or may this be a bug? Thanks for ideas?

Would loke to upgreade to 2.6.1. in case of the new forms for long MOptions, but need to selct more than one!


That should work in 2.6.1-2 now.
    icon2.gif   Re: email problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 15:29:03 2006 

Chris Warner wrote:
Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing


There are two possible reasons:

1) The email address "christopher_warner@xxx.gov" is invalid. Some SMTP server immediately complain about invalid email addresses and refuse to send any mail then. In that case just supply an existing email address or remove that test account.

2) The SMTP server does not like the "SIZE=xxx" option. This comes from a single line in elogd.c:

snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s SIZE=%d\r\n", from, strlen(text));

you could just go there and remove the " SIZE=%d", so that the line looks like:

snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s\r\n", from);
to see if that makes any difference.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 152, 153, 154 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6