Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 154 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1675   Fri Feb 10 11:41:38 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo  Re: Posting without logging in!

Dimitris wrote:
Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can post as myself using this command, then shouldn't something be done about this?


Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works.
  1676   Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:
Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris.


Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.

- Stefan
  1677   Fri Feb 10 16:16:11 2006 Reply Dimitrios Tsirigkasdimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.chInfo  Re: Posting without logging in!

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works.


Just tried it, it's fixed Smile
Dimitris
  1678   Fri Feb 10 17:22:36 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris.


Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.

- Stefan



Steve Jones wrote:

Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
  1679   Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:
Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?


Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great.
  1680   Fri Feb 10 20:24:56 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?


Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great.


Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().

So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used?
  1681   Fri Feb 10 20:29:12 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:
Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().

So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used?


No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the
#ifdef OS_SOLARIS

  forkpty(...)
  {
    ...
  }

#endif

conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c
  1683   Fri Feb 10 21:50:27 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux Re: email problems

Chris Warner wrote:
Do you have an ise when that will be?


In about a week from now.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6