Configuration of HTML editor, posted by Kristján Jónsson on Thu Jan 10 18:30:26 2008
|
Do I have to do any extra configuration in elog to enable the FCKeditor.
What I get with V2.7.0-1954 is that the main message entry field looks and behaves identically whether I set the encoding to HTML or plain (except
the width and height of the field changes). |
Re: Configuration of HTML editor, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 11 08:08:51 2008
|
Kristján Jónsson wrote:
Do I have to do any extra configuration in elog to enable the FCKeditor. |
Re: Configuration of HTML editor, posted by Kristján Jónsson on Fri Jan 11 14:33:58 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Unknown toolbar item 'ShowBlocks', posted by Uwe on Wed Jan 9 21:12:20 2008
|
Hello,
I just made an update from version V2.7.0-1964 to V2.7.0-1985 and I am receiving now the error message Unknown
toolbar item 'ShowBlocks' whenever creating or editing an entry. When clicking onto Ok, everything seems to work fine. Can you help please? |
Re: Unknown toolbar item 'ShowBlocks', posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 10 08:27:53 2008
|
Uwe wrote:
Hello, |
Re: Unknown toolbar item 'ShowBlocks', posted by Uwe on Thu Jan 10 15:32:40 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Unknown toolbar item 'ShowBlocks', posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 10 16:31:22 2008
|
Uwe wrote:
|
"Default encoding" default is not as documented , posted by Kristján Jónsson on Thu Jan 10 15:24:53 2008
|
Hi,
"Default encoding" appears to have the default value of 2 (HTML) instead of 0 (ELCode) as documented in http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html
|
Re: "Default encoding" default is not as documented , posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 10 15:30:35 2008
|
[quote]"Default encoding" appears to have the default value of 2 (HTML) instead of 0 (ELCode) as documented in http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html
ELOG V2.7.0-1954 : elog.c line 8952
|
Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Uwe on Wed Nov 28 19:53:05 2007
|
Hello,
when using the summary view, the text field displays umlauts as HTML-charachters, for e. g. diesbezüglich.
Is there a chance that also this view displays umlauts as ä, ü, ö? |
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 29 15:04:49 2007
|
Uwe wrote:
Hello, |
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Uwe on Thu Nov 29 18:58:32 2007
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Uwe on Thu Nov 29 19:13:02 2007
|
Uwe
wrote:
|
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 29 19:25:50 2007
|
Uwe wrote:
Just another thing I would like to admit. We are often using the summary view. Sometimes the summary view shows |
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Uwe on Thu Nov 29 19:38:03 2007
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
Completed Swedish translation, posted by Kenneth Andersson on Wed Jan 9 10:43:42 2008
|
Hi!
I have completed the Swedish translation and wonder how I can deliver it (if it´s still needed)?
|
Re: Completed Swedish translation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 9 11:00:21 2008
|
Kenneth Andersson wrote:
I have completed the Swedish translation and wonder how I can deliver it (if it´s still |
Re: Summary view - Umlauts, posted by Kenneth Andersson on Tue Jan 8 22:30:45 2008
|
Uwe
wrote:
|
Moving a logbook from one installation to another, posted by Val Schmidt on Mon Dec 17 02:17:20 2007
|
I've attempted to move a logbook from an old elog installation to a new one on
another system. The version of elog is the same (2.6.1) in both. Both systems have the same name and the logbooks are and installation are going in the
same place. So all paths are identical. Also, for the new installation, I've simply recompiled the same sources used to install the original one. The only |
Re: Moving a logbook from one installation to another, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Dec 17 08:13:22 2007
|
Val Schmidt wrote:
I've attempted to move a logbook |
Re: Moving a logbook from one installation to another, posted by Val Schmidt on Mon Dec 17 19:18:13 2007
|
Stefan, I'm still stumped. I'm sorry for the hassle. |
Re: Moving a logbook from one installation to another, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Dec 18 09:41:16 2007
|
First of all, you should also describe what has been improved. While for you it is important what is not working, for me it is also important
what is working, to get more information if such a problem should occur again. So is your demo entry still there? Is the numbering still starting
from 1 after you removed the demo entry? |
ELog Friendly Reporting Tools, posted by Matt on Wed Dec 12 16:05:00 2007
|
We have used ELog for some time now (within the IT industry) for several things (on-call tracking, after-hours work, knowledge base and a few other uses
in development). Now that we have a good base of data, we would like to do some trending analysis. We have used Excel in the past for this,
but it is rather time consuming. Does anyone have recommendations for tools (hopefully open source) they have used? I know nearly anything |