| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1663
|
Wed Feb 8 15:29:03 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: email problems |
| Chris Warner wrote: | Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing
|
There are two possible reasons:
1) The email address "christopher_warner@xxx.gov" is invalid. Some SMTP server immediately complain about invalid email addresses and refuse to send any mail then. In that case just supply an existing email address or remove that test account.
2) The SMTP server does not like the "SIZE=xxx" option. This comes from a single line in elogd.c:
snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s SIZE=%d\r\n", from, strlen(text));
you could just go there and remove the " SIZE=%d", so that the line looks like:
snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s\r\n", from);
to see if that makes any difference. |
|
1669
|
Thu Feb 9 09:04:05 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.1-1622 | Re: menu commands - user list does not match config list |
| Alan Stone wrote: | I am attempting to configure the Elog for use at the CMS Remote Operations Center
at Fermilab. I included the following option:
Menu commands = List, New, Reply, Duplicate, Find, Last day, Config, Admin, Login, Logout, Help
but the available list (after restarting the elog daemon) gives me:
CMS ROC Logbook, Page 1 of 1 Logged in as "Alan Stone" ELOG Home
New | Find | Select | CSV Import | Config | Logout | Help
Did I miss a step in the syntax instructions? |
Yap. There are two menus, one for the listing page which contains only line per entry, and one for the individual entry page. You changed the one for the individual entry page, which you will see when you slick on any entry. To change the listing page manu, do a List Menu commands = ... |
|
1670
|
Thu Feb 9 09:09:30 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: email problems |
| Chris Warner wrote: | | The email address id correct. I am using an Elog Binary. I don't have the source code. |
Ok, so I removed the SIZE=xxx parameter, which is not strictly necessary anyhow I believe. So wait for the next release, and you can try. |
|
1671
|
Thu Feb 9 09:12:44 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: Work on PAM Support? |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking at sample code. |
Not really. I have two big issues higher on my list: XML database format and multithreaded HTTP server. From having a quick look to PAM, I was not sure how easy this would be to implement. If it's not too difficult, it could move higher in the priority list. |
|
1675
|
Fri Feb 10 11:41:38 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Posting without logging in! |
| Dimitris wrote: | | Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can post as myself using this command, then shouldn't something be done about this? |
Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works. |
|
1676
|
Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. |
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.
- Stefan |
|
1679
|
Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great. |
|
1681
|
Fri Feb 10 20:29:12 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used? |
No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the
#ifdef OS_SOLARIS
forkpty(...)
{
...
}
#endif
conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c |
|