Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 171 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  1999   Tue Oct 17 09:35:01 2006 Reply Arckonitcrashrunover@hotmail.comQuestionWindows2.6.2Re: Email format
;)I've searched, i don't understand
but thanks !
"relis ton foutu manuel !"
excellent
  2003   Tue Oct 17 14:39:29 2006 Reply Dimitrios Tsirigkasdimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.chQuestion  Re: Problem with large entry size

Stefan Ritt wrote:

The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, it will help if you post such long entries just in "plain" form.

- Stefan


Hi again,

I was wondering what is the cleanest way of changing old entries already submitted in ELCode into plain text. If I do not include ELCode in the allowed encodings does this apply to already submitted entries as well or will they still be treated as ELCode?

Thanks,
Dimitris
  2004   Tue Oct 17 14:42:58 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion  Re: Problem with large entry size

Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote:
I was wondering what is the cleanest way of changing old entries already submitted in ELCode into plain text. If I do not include ELCode in the allowed encodings does this apply to already submitted entries as well or will they still be treated as ELCode?


The encoding is stored as an "invisible" attribute in each entry. You can change it in two ways:

1) Select each entry, click "edit", change the encoding with the radio buttons at the bottom and submit it again

2) Go and edit directly the xxxxxxa.log files in your logbook directory. You will see in those files something like
Encoding: ELCode

and you can change it with an editor to
Encoding: plain

Afterwards you have to restart the elogd daemon.

Did you try the new version, would be interesting to see if it's any better...
  2005   Tue Oct 17 14:47:53 2006 Reply Dimitrios Tsirigkasdimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.chQuestion  Re: Problem with large entry size
Thanks Stefan,


Stefan Ritt wrote:
Did you try the new version, would be interesting to see if it's any better...


I didn't find the time to try it yet but I will do that later today. I will keep you posted - more soon.

Cheers,
Dimitris
  2006   Thu Oct 19 07:00:57 2006 Agree Grant Jeffcotegrant@jeffcote.orgQuestionWindows2.5.2Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line
> > Is there any way to configure elog so that attribute fields can be edited 
> > on more than line like the 'text' field? 
> > 
> > (This would be useful so that attributes could contain larger portions of 
> > text including line breaks)
> 
> No, but this request is already on the wishlist
> (http://midas.psi.ch/elog/wishlist.html) since some time. I added your vote.

Hi Stefan, could you add my vote for this feature too please?

Many thx
  2007   Thu Oct 19 11:45:18 2006 Question Alexandre Lindotealex@lipc.fis.uc.ptQuestionLinux2.6.2-1699How to pass attachment names to an Execute line?
Hi,

I'm trying to pass the name of an attachment in a "Execute new " line, but I can't seem to get the correct syntax...
I've tried:
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log

but nothing seem to work. If I remove the $attachments bit the output is correct...
Any suggestions?

Thanks

Alex
  2011   Thu Oct 19 19:45:35 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.6.2-1699Re: How to pass attachment names to an Execute line?

Alexandre Lindote wrote:
Hi,

I'm trying to pass the name of an attachment in a "Execute new " line, but I can't seem to get the correct syntax...
I've tried:
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $attachements1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log
Execute new = echo "New document with reference $Internal Ref with the name $1 " >> /home/zeplin3/lixo.log

but nothing seem to work. If I remove the $attachments bit the output is correct...
Any suggestions?


Sorry there was a type in the documentation. You should write

$attachments

and not

$attachements

then it will work.
  2012   Fri Oct 20 13:26:10 2006 Question Alexandre Lindotealex@lipc.fis.uc.ptQuestionLinux2.6.2-1699Text column in the main list
Hi,

is there a way of removing the "Text" column from the main listing of a logbook?
I have a logbook that works as a document database, and I don't even allow the entering of text... But the column insists on appearing! Smile

Thanks

Alex
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6