ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1990
|
Mon Oct 16 08:57:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
Ibrahim Genc wrote: | There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want. |
I tried but I was unable to obtain a free account. Furthermore, the problem is probably related to your SMTP server's authentication method. There are many methods and ELOG only supports a subset. So I would have to try with your specific SMTP server. So the only recommendation I can give you is to find an SMTP server without authentication. That one will certainly work with elog. |
1992
|
Mon Oct 16 16:53:43 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here? |
The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, it will help if you post such long entries just in "plain" form.
- Stefan |
1993
|
Mon Oct 16 17:18:58 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
- Stefan |
1994
|
Mon Oct 16 17:32:58 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
Stefan Ritt wrote: | I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
- Stefan |
Dear Stefan,
Thank you for your quick reply. I will install the new version and I will let you know as soon soon as possible.
Best,
Dimitris |
1996
|
Tue Oct 17 09:14:41 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
Arckonit wrote: | I know the use "use email heading" and other, but i would like to configure the body of the mail, where there is the link, the name of the author, etc. |
Following options can be used to format the email body:
- Use Email heading = ...
- Use Email Subject = ...
- Email attributes = ...
- Email encoding = ...
- Email format = ...
Probably the last one is the one you are looking for... |
1997
|
Tue Oct 17 09:29:39 2006 |
| Arckonit | crashrunover@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
Thanx for the quick answer
Email format = ?
Where can i find some help to use this feature ? |
1998
|
Tue Oct 17 09:32:21 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
Arckonit wrote: | Thanx for the quick answer
Email format = ?
Where can i find some help to use this feature ? |
RTFM!
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#flags search for Email format |
1999
|
Tue Oct 17 09:35:01 2006 |
| Arckonit | crashrunover@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
;)I've searched, i don't understand
but thanks !
"relis ton foutu manuel !"
excellent |