"Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Nov 24 20:08:00 2005
|
Hi, it's me again!
I have found one possible bug. We have declared top groups for our logbooks; one for administration and one for the shift logbooks. In the [global]-section |
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Fri Nov 25 14:05:08 2005
|
| OK, I found the note about "Logbook dir" in Stephen Wood's entry (http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1101) ;) |
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 20:50:57 2005
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]There are also one question/request (you see that we use the elog extensively now ;)):
When searching for a particular event in our shift log using the "Find" function, it would often be useful not to go to the single entry, but to the page
where that entry resides. This way we can see the whole context of the event. When clicking onto an entry in the "Find" result page, this takes us of course |
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Jan 4 15:27:31 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I implemented that request. When you click on "list", it takes you to the listing page containing the current entry, which is even
highlighted. Have a look at this forum if this is what you like.[/quote]
|
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 9 20:09:16 2006
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]One strange thing (maybe it isn't strange at all) is the following behaviour: when the list view is set to "summary", then the line
containing the entry where we clicked "list" is highlighted, however when the list view is set to "full", it isn't. Is this "a bug, or a feature"? ;)[/quote]
|
elogd 2.6.0 crash on password Forgot?, posted by Mike on Tue Jan 3 17:20:16 2006 
|
I have been having a repeatable crash on V2.6.0 everytime someone tries to recover a password using the option from the login screen. See attachment for
a jpg of the message.
|
|
"Syntax of elogd.cfg" - Document, posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Thu Dec 22 21:15:19 2005
|
The document "ELOG - Syntax of elogd.cfg" is outdated!
Are we going to have an updated documented?
|
|
Re: "Syntax of elogd.cfg" - Document, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Dec 23 09:07:14 2005
|
[quote="Edmundo T Rodriguez"]The document "ELOG - Syntax of elogd.cfg" is outdated![/quote]
I forgot to update the web server, but the document distributed in the 2.6.0 package was up to date.
|
Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Mike on Thu Dec 22 14:32:00 2005
|
Is there a Maximum number logbooks?
I have run into a problem but I'm not sure if to call it a Bug or not. We have started using Elog to keep a work log for each of our production servers. |
|
Re: Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 15:14:39 2005
|
[quote="Mike"]Is there a Maximum number logbooks?
I have run into a problem but I'm not sure if to call it a Bug or not. We have started using Elog to keep a work log for each of our production servers. |
Re: Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Mike on Thu Dec 22 15:39:23 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
You're really pushing to the limit ;)
|
|
New docs?, posted by PJ Meyer on Thu Dec 22 01:17:12 2005
|
Just looked at change log for 2.6
was wondering where the documentation for the new additions/changes is/are. |
|
Re: New docs?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 08:58:25 2005
|
[quote="PJ Meyer"]Just looked at change log for 2.6
was wondering where the documentation for the new additions/changes is/are.[/quote]
|
|
Compile on Windows?, posted by Mike on Wed Dec 21 23:52:27 2005
|
What version of Visual Studio do you use for compile Elog on windows.
I have downloaded the Tar from svn and am having some errors, but then I've go VS.Net 2003. I wondering if this was done with 6.0?
|
|
Re: Compile on Windows?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 08:53:43 2005
|
[quote="Mike"]What version of Visual Studio do you use for compile Elog on windows.
I have downloaded the Tar from svn and am having some errors, but then I've go VS.Net 2003. I wondering if this was done with 6.0?[/quote]
|
|
Proxy question, posted by Jesse Wodin on Wed Dec 7 02:37:40 2005
|
I'm trying to run elog 2.6.0-beta4 under Apache 2.0. I follow the directions, and everything works fine, so my
elog runs as
|
|
Re: Proxy question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 21 20:59:26 2005
|
> I'm trying to run elog 2.6.0-beta4 under Apache 2.0. I follow the directions, and everything works fine, so my
> elog runs as
>
|
|
2.6.0-bata5, posted by Carl Shirey on Sat Dec 10 02:01:33 2005
|
Do you have 2.6.0-bata5 for linux as setup for RPM install. I was able to locate the version for windows but not for linux.
Thanks for your help. |
|
Re: 2.6.0-bata5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 21 20:39:52 2005
|
[quote="Carl Shirey"]Do you have 2.6.0-bata5 for linux as setup for RPM install. I was able to locate the version for windows but not for linux.
Thanks for your help.[/quote]
|