Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 208 of 795  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectup
  67605   Thu Nov 7 02:18:17 2013 Reply A.G. Schubertalexis4@stanford.eduBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

  67606   Thu Nov 7 08:08:12 2013 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

A.G. Schubert wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

SVN is obsolete and will NOT be maintained any more, since we completely switched to GIT. Actually I will disable the service soon. 

  67650   Tue Jan 14 05:19:47 2014 Reply Ed McNicholed@mcnichol.comBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

SVN is obsolete and will NOT be maintained any more, since we completely switched to GIT. Actually I will disable the service soon. 

 I too am having issues installing on Mac OS X 10.9.1. I changed CFLAGS in makefile to;

CFLAGS += -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0

I get many lines of errors like this when I run make;

/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9.sdk/usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:1491:6: note: 'SSL_accept' declared here

int     SSL_accept(SSL *ssl) DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;

        ^

src/elogd.c:28809:19: warning: 'SSL_set_fd' is deprecated: first deprecated in OS X 10.7 [-Wdeprecated-declarations]

                  SSL_set_fd(ka_ssl_con[i_min], ka_sock[i_min]);

 

                  ^

 
  67651   Tue Jan 14 08:15:19 2014 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

Ed McNichol wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

SVN is obsolete and will NOT be maintained any more, since we completely switched to GIT. Actually I will disable the service soon. 

 I too am having issues installing on Mac OS X 10.9.1. I changed CFLAGS in makefile to;

CFLAGS += -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0

I get many lines of errors like this when I run make;

/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9.sdk/usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:1491:6: note: 'SSL_accept' declared here

int     SSL_accept(SSL *ssl) DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;

        ^

src/elogd.c:28809:19: warning: 'SSL_set_fd' is deprecated: first deprecated in OS X 10.7 [-Wdeprecated-declarations]

                  SSL_set_fd(ka_ssl_con[i_min], ka_sock[i_min]);

 

                  ^

 

If you would use the Makefile from the GIT repository there would be no errors under OS X 10.9.1:

/elog$ make                                                                                                                                                                 
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -w -c -o crypt.o src/crypt.c                                         
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -o elog src/elog.c crypt.o -lssl                                     
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -w -c -o regex.o src/regex.c                                         
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -w -c -o auth.o src/auth.c                                           
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -c -o mxml.o ../mxml/mxml.c                                          
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -c -o strlcpy.o ../mxml/strlcpy.c                                    
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -o elogd src/elogd.c crypt.o auth.o regex.o mxml.o strlcpy.o -lssl   
cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -o elconv src/elconv.c -lssl                                         
/elog$                                                                                                                                                                      

Actually what you need is -Wno-deprecated-declarations to suppress the warnings. The open SSL functions will at some point be removed from OSX, they have their own implementation of SSL. So then we either have to ship openSSL together with elog or use Apple's implementatoin. But for now we are still fine.

/Stefan

 

 

  977   Tue Mar 8 17:34:05 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Compilation flag/file question
> If I want to go to the latest CVS release, what files do I have to compile
> along with the elogd.c file?  Also, do I need to use any special gcc flags
> for the compilation?  Thanks.

You need elogd.c, mxml.c and regex.c, the Makefile you can get from CVS as well 

http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/Makefile
  978   Tue Mar 8 19:23:14 2005 Reply Benjamin Brownbrownbr@hotmail.comQuestionLinux2.5.7Re: Compilation flag/file question
> > If I want to go to the latest CVS release, what files do I have to compile
> > along with the elogd.c file?  Also, do I need to use any special gcc flags
> > for the compilation?  Thanks.
> 
> You need elogd.c, mxml.c and regex.c, the Makefile you can get from CVS as well 
> 
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/Makefile

Worked like a charm.  Thanks again.
  68840   Wed Sep 12 11:10:18 2018 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux3.1.3Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source

This warning is triggered by the use of the sprintf() funciton, which can write beyond the boundary of the destination string. I replaced it by snprintf(), which should make the compiler happy. Code is committed. Unfortuantely I have no FC27 here, so if there is still some waring with the current code, please post the full warning list here.

Stefan

  Draft   Wed Sep 12 15:20:11 2018 Reply Allen TuttleAllenEmail@wavecable.comBug reportLinux3.1.3Re: Compile issues on Fedora withe current elog source

I don't see the update on elog/download/tar/.
Do you keep builds elsewhere, perhaps on get or sourceforge?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

This warning is triggered by the use of the sprintf() funciton, which can write beyond the boundary of the destination string. I replaced it by snprintf(), which should make the compiler happy. Code is committed. Unfortuantely I have no FC27 here, so if there is still some waring with the current code, please post the full warning list here.

Stefan

 

ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf