| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
2323
|
Sat Oct 6 15:44:51 2007 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.5-1890 | Re: testing for the limit of the elog database |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | So there are only 2 user defined fields in the database.
Everything works ......... but terrible slow : is there a rule of thumb for the size of the database ? |
Yes. The rule of thumb is that currently elog runs fine for a few 10000 entries. At 100000 entries it starts getting slow. I have already in my to-do list the task to improve the performance for large databases, and I have a rough idea where the bottleneck is, but I pushed the priority low because not many people have large databases right now (but it might change in the future). How many entries do you have? (It's not the size of the entries, but the number!) |
|
2324
|
Sat Oct 6 15:56:13 2007 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.Teeling3@chello.nl | Question | Windows | 2.6.5-1890 | Re: testing for the limit of the elog database |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | So there are only 2 user defined fields in the database.
Everything works ......... but terrible slow : is there a rule of thumb for the size of the database ? |
Yes. The rule of thumb is that currently elog runs fine for a few 10000 entries. At 100000 entries it starts getting slow. I have already in my to-do list the task to improve the performance for large databases, and I have a rough idea where the bottleneck is, but I pushed the priority low because not many people have large databases right now (but it might change in the future). How many entries do you have? (It's not the size of the entries, but the number!) |
That's a quick answer.  I just was testing. I'm trying to introduce elog at work, so i'm not having an actual database in production. In the test database I had 125386 entries. Two column: "Customers name" and "documents".
By the way : my email address has changed : how do I change that ??
Thanks |
|
2325
|
Sat Oct 6 16:11:50 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.5-1890 | Re: testing for the limit of the elog database |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | | By the way : my email address has changed : how do I change that ?? |
Click on 'Config'. |
|
2327
|
Sat Oct 6 17:15:59 2007 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Question | Windows | | Re: how to use the find calendar |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | Hello
In the find page you use a calendar popup from which the user can click on a date and the date boxes are filled in with the correct date. Can I use that calendar also? If so, can you show me an example of it's usage.
I found it , Sorry for the question, ( RTFM ) Read The Fucking Manual )
|
|
|
2328
|
Tue Oct 9 11:48:17 2007 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | | I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments. |
There is already a time and a date stamp. If you look in the logbook directory, you see attachments preceded with the date and time when they were submitted. You can see this date/time when you click on the attachment, such as in
http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Config+Examples/040519_000348/elogd.cfg
where you will see it even in the URL (May 19th, 2004, 0:03:48) in the above case. I agree that this is not so obvious. If you make a proposal where this date/time should be displayed, I can easily add it. |
Hi, I think this would be great new functionality, so I would propose the date/time stamp for an uploaded file was placed just after the file size text that appears at the far right hand side of all attachments.
Many Thanks
Fergus |
|
2331
|
Fri Oct 19 09:08:06 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V2.6.5-189 | Re: default css style |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | The default tiny.css has a bug in it.
It's calling a class that does not exists. The class name is : list1h and list2h. |
Thanks Arno. I didn't touch tiny.css since a couple of years now, and the list1h/2h were introduced after I wrote tiny.css. Actually compact.css had the same problem. I added this to the SVN version, so it will be included in the next release. |
|
65621
|
Fri Oct 19 21:44:00 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | | Hi, I think this would be great new functionality, so I would propose the date/time stamp for an uploaded file was placed just after the file size text that appears at the far right hand side of all attachments. |
I implemented this as you can see at elog:Linux+Demo/14 . The new feature will be contained in the next release, and will also work for entries made before this feature was implemented. |
|
65623
|
Sun Oct 21 00:17:34 2007 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Info | Windows | 2.6.5-1890 | Re: Quick Filter and boolean option question |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: | ; BUG : When "Contract" is at the second position in the "Attributes".
; We See in the "Quick Filter" a pulldown showing "Serienummer" with only "0" or "1" ,
; this is NOT what i want or is expected !!!
[WRONG]
Attributes = Server , Contract , ContractID, Serienummer,Locatie , Category , TEST4
Options Category = Server, Printer , Disk, Router
; Please notice that the boolean attribute is at the second position in the attributes <list>,
;this is a bug, otherwise the "Quick Filter" gets it wrong. So Boolean attributes must always
;be the last item when defining the Attributes
Options Contract = boolean
Quick Filter = Server , Serienummer , Category
; This is OK : Just moving the "Contract" to the end of the "Attributes"
; Now the "Quick Filter" is a normal entrie field and not a pulldown.
; So , now i can enter a Serialnumber. This is what i want and is expected.
[OK]
Attributes = Server , ContractID, Serienummer,Locatie , Category , TEST4 , Contract
Options Category = Server, Printer , Disk, Router
; Please notice that the boolean attribute is the last in the attributes <list>, this is a bug, otherwise the "Quick Filter" gets it wrong. So Boolean attributes must always be the last item when defining the Attributes
Options Contract = boolean
Quick Filter = Server , Serienummer , Category
Just switch between "wrong" and "OK" to see the "quick filter" changes. |
| Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Hello again
Maybe it's not nice to begin with "BUG:" but i was in a hurry. Sorry for that.
Because I did not get an answer i think i must ask it in an other way : De [WRONG] and [OK] configurations are identical except for the order in which the Attributes appear. This causes the "Quick Filter" problem, as you can see when changing between the [Wrong] and [OK] tabs.
Am I missing some config setting or i am lost here ?
By the way : I see you are running version 2.6.5-1937. Is there a windows version of that too ?
with kind regards
|
|
|