As default http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> shows the Summary View.
Clicking in "Full" changes the URL to http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK>/?mode=full.
But now the URL http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> show the Full view as default.
I think the URL without ?mode=... should show every time the same result,
regardless the view used before. Or maybe I can configure, which view I want to
see if I use the URL w/o ?mode=... The option to hide/show attachments is affected too.

Example:
Default view mode = 0 | 1 | 2 | 3
0 = remember last used (default)
1 = Summary
2 = Full
3 = Threaded


Default attachment mode = 0 | 1 | 2
0 = remember last used (default)
1 = Hide attachment
2 = Show Attachment

[quote="Alex H"]Hi Stephan,
I have a unknown bug and need help :)!

First, please take a look to attached screenshot
On the "elog problem1.gif" and "elog problem2.gif" there aren't any problem.
The entry "Mairie STO" appears correct but when I try to edit the "Equipment" field, the list/combo shows 
improper data.
I obtain "- please select -" instead of "RT0004"
What's the problem ?
Thanks a lot.[/quote]

UP! No idea :'( ?

Hello Alex,

can you please provide the following information:
- Which ELOG version do you use?
- From which logbook are the screenshots? (I assume it's Liste - right?)

I've tested your configuration with version V2.6.1-1663, and in my case it works.
I use your attribute block in GLOBAL section and the following logbook:

[DEMO]
Comment = TEST
Attributes = Admin, Client, Equipment
Extendable options = Client, Equipment

Regards
Holger

> [quote="Alex H"]Hi Stephan,
> I have a unknown bug and need help :)!
> 
> First, please take a look to attached screenshot
> On the "elog problem1.gif" and "elog problem2.gif" there aren't any problem.
> The entry "Mairie STO" appears correct but when I try to edit the "Equipment" field, the list/combo shows 
> improper data.
> I obtain "- please select -" instead of "RT0004"
> What's the problem ?
> Thanks a lot.[/quote]
> 
> UP! No idea :'( ?

hello ELOG developers,

i think that i found a problem in the find function of ELOG  version 2.6.1. i can reproduce it on the forum ELOG website on midas.psi.ch:

go to: http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Contributions/?cmd=Find
and enter under author 'ritt' and check the 'search all logbooks' checkmark, then search

the returned list has all your postings on all three ELOG sections, but if you look at the links that are returned, they point to the 'Contributions' 
portion of the ELOG and not the 'Forum' portion as they should. this means that the wrong posting is returned when you click on the link (or in 
this case, no posting at all).

for example, the HTML of the first link is
[...]
<tr>
<td class="list2" nowrap><a href="1723">Forum</a></td>
<td class="list2">
<a href="1723">&nbsp;&nbsp;1723&nbsp;&nbsp;</a>
</td>

<td class="list2" nowrap><a href="1723">Thu Feb 23 15:50:20 2006</a></td>
<td class="list2"><a href="1723">Stefan <B style="color:black;background-color:#ffff66">Ritt</B></a></td><td class="list2"><a 
href="1723"><a href="stefan.ritt@psi.ch">stefan.ritt@psi.ch</a></a></td><td class="list2"><a href="1723">Question</a></td><td 
class="list2"><a href="1723">Re: Protect Selection page</a></td><td class="list2"><a href="1723"></a>&nbsp;</td><td class="list2"><a 
href="1723"></a>&nbsp;</td><tr>
[...]

i.e., it is missing '../Forum' in front of all the links.

regards,
patrick.

Hi Holger,

> Which ELOG version do you use?
I'am using the version V2.6.1-1653 of Elog 

> From which logbook are the screenshots? (I assume it's Liste - right?)
Right :)!

I've just seen that Stefan has build a V2.6.1-1663 version of ELOG.
I try to install this new version and gave you answer as soon as possible :)!

> Hi Holger,
> 
> > Which ELOG version do you use?
> I'am using the version V2.6.1-1653 of Elog 
> 
> > From which logbook are the screenshots? (I assume it's Liste - right?)
> Right :)!
> 
> I've just seen that Stefan has build a V2.6.1-1663 version of ELOG.
> I try to install this new version and gave you answer as soon as possible :)!

Now I'am using the Elog V2.6.1-1668 and same probleme.
I think it's a data problem. I have edited my logbooks\Liste\050302a.log with an Hexadecimal editor and found one 
carruage return juste before the