ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1844
|
Mon Jun 5 14:19:52 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Info | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | 'Click through' order of elog enteries |
Hi There,
When you find a set of records in ELOG and then 'click through' the returned list it runs through then in order of ID. - I s there a way to modify this behaviour?
Many Thanks
Fergus |
1888
|
Wed Aug 9 12:25:57 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | V2.6.2-169 | Retain original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog |
Hi There,
We have a number of weblogs where we regular archive off 'completed' entries to a separate archive weblog:
Is it possible to retain the original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog, or have a locked field which holds the original id which we could subsequently reference in the archive?
Many Thanks
Fergus |
2043
|
Mon Nov 6 17:36:35 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
David Egolf wrote: | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
I find that the Google spell checker works very well in IE6. |
2084
|
Mon Nov 20 16:23:37 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | $long_name in Moptions |
Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list.
Thanks
Fergus |
2086
|
Tue Nov 21 09:44:30 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | Re: Re: $long_name in Moptions |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Fergus Lynch wrote: | Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list. |
This was not possible until now, so I implemented the option
Type <attribute> = muserlist
which gives you checkboxes (= multi-userlist) for all users instead of a drop down list. This feature is implemented starting from revision 1758 and it will be contained in the next release of elog. |
WowThat was quick, I'll implement this morning. Many thanks for introducing this, ELOG is such a good tool.
Many Thanks
Fergus |
2087
|
Tue Nov 21 11:14:48 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | Re: Re: $long_name in Moptions |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Fergus Lynch wrote: | Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list. |
This was not possible until now, so I implemented the option
Type <attribute> = muserlist
which gives you checkboxes (= multi-userlist) for all users instead of a drop down list. This feature is implemented starting from revision 1758 and it will be contained in the next release of elog. |
Hi Stefan, apologies if I am being a bit dense (!) When I download the latest windows binary it extracts to ELOG V2.6.2-1749. Where could I get revision 1758 >
Thanks in advance
Fergus |
2175
|
Mon Mar 26 11:45:07 2007 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Global "MOptions" |
Hi,
We have ELOG configured for virtually every conceivable use in our IT Operation dept and it is fantastically useful and easy to use. One result of this - naturally! - is that we have quiet a few logbooks.
Many of these logbooks share the same attributes - especially Moptions for equipment lists - which is fine but requires manually copying and pasting Moption lists into multiple logbooks to keep everything synchronized.
Would it be an option to have Global "MOptions" - perhaps configured in the 'global options' file - which can be called up and referenced in all logbooks?
Just an idea -
Cheers
Fergus |
2177
|
Tue Mar 27 13:57:44 2007 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Global "MOptions" |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Fergus Lynch wrote: | Would it be an option to have Global "MOptions" - perhaps configured in the 'global options' file - which can be called up and referenced in all logbooks? |
Sure, that's possible already with the current version. Just put your MOptions statement under [global] and it will be used in all logbooks. If a specific logbook uses different MOptions, put the a second MOptions list under that logbook's section and it will overwrite the global setting. |
Perfect! Works a treat (I promise to read the manual next time!)
Cheers
Fergus |