| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
69274
|
Thu Dec 3 01:53:59 2020 |
 | Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.7-2246 | Re: Change / List Change doen't work anymore? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | Yepp, the documentation was wrong. I fixed it.
Stefan |
Thank you. |
|
69285
|
Thu Dec 31 18:35:19 2020 |
| prinnydood | moltensolderlabs@pm.me | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Path disclosure on unfound file | I can confirm this issue exists on version 3.1.3, which I have installed elog on Debian 10.
The issue also exists on version 3.14 (1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7), which I tested on an AmazonLinux EC2 instance.
This is what I found:
1. if I leave out the extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish
2. if I include any random extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish.php or /gibberish.htm or /gibberish.asdfasd
3. if I include any .html extension specifically at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, elog exposes the path /usr/share/elog/themes/default/gibberish.html. This is a bug... Example: /gibberish.html exposes the path, and likewise, /.gibberish.html ( "dot" + gibberish) exposes the path
4. if I include a valid, existent .html file which is located in the directory /usr/share/elog/themes/default/, and call it, elog exposes the html document. Example: I created an html file called gibberish.html (containing <html><body><p>Hello world</p></body></html>) in my system's /usr/share/elog/themes/default/ directory. After navigating back to the /gibberish.html URL, I was presented with the HTML file.
Turning on -v (verbose mode), the response by elogd when accessing these are: "GET /elog/gibberish.html HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays "Hello world" html file), and "GET /elog/gibberish.asdfasd HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays red error box).
=====
My guess: the program seems to be caring about the files ONLY if they have html file extension. Please see the screenshots below.
====
What are the security implications? Not much, I think. From what I can tell, exposing the "/usr/share/themes/elog" path, and also exposing the elog version when the file does not exist. Hope this reply helps anyone else with the same question.
(I am sure the error exposing the version can be removed by editing the source code--this is probably beyond my capabilities at this point). |
| Attachment 1: no_extension.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: nonexistent_html.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: random_extension.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: valid_html_file_with_html_extension.png
|
|
|
69288
|
Fri Jan 8 13:47:14 2021 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Path disclosure on unfound file | Ok, I fixed the code in the current commit (395e101add19f0fe8a11a25d0822e511f34d94d1). The path gets stripped, and we see a
| prinnydood wrote: |
|
I can confirm this issue exists on version 3.1.3, which I have installed elog on Debian 10.
The issue also exists on version 3.14 (1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7), which I tested on an AmazonLinux EC2 instance.
This is what I found:
1. if I leave out the extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish
2. if I include any random extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish.php or /gibberish.htm or /gibberish.asdfasd
3. if I include any .html extension specifically at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, elog exposes the path /usr/share/elog/themes/default/gibberish.html. This is a bug... Example: /gibberish.html exposes the path, and likewise, /.gibberish.html ( "dot" + gibberish) exposes the path
4. if I include a valid, existent .html file which is located in the directory /usr/share/elog/themes/default/, and call it, elog exposes the html document. Example: I created an html file called gibberish.html (containing <html><body><p>Hello world</p></body></html>) in my system's /usr/share/elog/themes/default/ directory. After navigating back to the /gibberish.html URL, I was presented with the HTML file.
Turning on -v (verbose mode), the response by elogd when accessing these are: "GET /elog/gibberish.html HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays "Hello world" html file), and "GET /elog/gibberish.asdfasd HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays red error box).
=====
My guess: the program seems to be caring about the files ONLY if they have html file extension. Please see the screenshots below.
====
What are the security implications? Not much, I think. From what I can tell, exposing the "/usr/share/themes/elog" path, and also exposing the elog version when the file does not exist. Hope this reply helps anyone else with the same question.
(I am sure the error exposing the version can be removed by editing the source code--this is probably beyond my capabilities at this point).
|
|
|
69299
|
Wed Feb 3 17:28:16 2021 |
| Gabriel Lopez | gabelopez@bnl.gov | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Path disclosure on unfound file | Hello, This is coming up as a high vulnerability in our scans. Are there plans to update the rpm for this fix? If so is there an ETA? Any update would be much appreciated. Currently running elog-3.1.4-2
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Ok, I fixed the code in the current commit (395e101add19f0fe8a11a25d0822e511f34d94d1). The path gets stripped, and we see a
| prinnydood wrote: |
|
I can confirm this issue exists on version 3.1.3, which I have installed elog on Debian 10.
The issue also exists on version 3.14 (1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7), which I tested on an AmazonLinux EC2 instance.
This is what I found:
1. if I leave out the extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish
2. if I include any random extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish.php or /gibberish.htm or /gibberish.asdfasd
3. if I include any .html extension specifically at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, elog exposes the path /usr/share/elog/themes/default/gibberish.html. This is a bug... Example: /gibberish.html exposes the path, and likewise, /.gibberish.html ( "dot" + gibberish) exposes the path
4. if I include a valid, existent .html file which is located in the directory /usr/share/elog/themes/default/, and call it, elog exposes the html document. Example: I created an html file called gibberish.html (containing <html><body><p>Hello world</p></body></html>) in my system's /usr/share/elog/themes/default/ directory. After navigating back to the /gibberish.html URL, I was presented with the HTML file.
Turning on -v (verbose mode), the response by elogd when accessing these are: "GET /elog/gibberish.html HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays "Hello world" html file), and "GET /elog/gibberish.asdfasd HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays red error box).
=====
My guess: the program seems to be caring about the files ONLY if they have html file extension. Please see the screenshots below.
====
What are the security implications? Not much, I think. From what I can tell, exposing the "/usr/share/themes/elog" path, and also exposing the elog version when the file does not exist. Hope this reply helps anyone else with the same question.
(I am sure the error exposing the version can be removed by editing the source code--this is probably beyond my capabilities at this point).
|
|
|
|
69300
|
Thu Feb 18 09:14:28 2021 |
 | Stefano Lacaprara | stefano.lacaprara@pd.infn.it | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | elog server go to high CPU and hangs | Dear expert,
I'm running the latest git version of elog ELOG V3.1.4-395e101a on ubuntu 20.04.2.
I'm experiencing frequent hangs of the elog server: the status is always reported as running, but the web server is not responding.
The only hint I have of something strange is that the elogd process is using a lot of CPU (50-100%), the log do not show anything suspect
as far as I can see.
Has anyone experienced something similar or has any idea how can I start to debug the problem?
Sorry for lack of many information, but I don't know what to look at.
Thanks in advance
Stefano |
|
69301
|
Thu Feb 18 12:05:52 2021 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | Re: elog server go to high CPU and hangs | Dear Stefano,
Try the entry I wrote some time ago elog:68655
David.
> Dear expert,
> I'm running the latest git version of elog ELOG V3.1.4-395e101a on ubuntu 20.04.2.
> I'm experiencing frequent hangs of the elog server: the status is always reported as running, but the web server is not responding.
> The only hint I have of something strange is that the elogd process is using a lot of CPU (50-100%), the log do not show anything suspect
> as far as I can see.
>
> Has anyone experienced something similar or has any idea how can I start to debug the problem?
>
> Sorry for lack of many information, but I don't know what to look at.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Stefano |
|
69302
|
Thu Feb 18 12:06:12 2021 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | Re: elog server go to high CPU and hangs | Usually a restart of the elogd server helps. If the problem persists, one of the logbooks might be corrupt. Try to disable one logbook at a time to figure out which one it is. Then
remove that one and set it up freshly.
Stefan |
|
69305
|
Fri Feb 19 09:59:04 2021 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Path disclosure on unfound file | I made a new RPM: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
| Gabriel Lopez wrote: |
|
Hello, This is coming up as a high vulnerability in our scans. Are there plans to update the rpm for this fix? If so is there an ETA? Any update would be much appreciated. Currently running elog-3.1.4-2
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Ok, I fixed the code in the current commit (395e101add19f0fe8a11a25d0822e511f34d94d1). The path gets stripped, and we see a
| prinnydood wrote: |
|
I can confirm this issue exists on version 3.1.3, which I have installed elog on Debian 10.
The issue also exists on version 3.14 (1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7), which I tested on an AmazonLinux EC2 instance.
This is what I found:
1. if I leave out the extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish
2. if I include any random extension at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, it gives me the red error box. So far so good... Example: /gibberish.php or /gibberish.htm or /gibberish.asdfasd
3. if I include any .html extension specifically at the end of the URL for a non-existent page, elog exposes the path /usr/share/elog/themes/default/gibberish.html. This is a bug... Example: /gibberish.html exposes the path, and likewise, /.gibberish.html ( "dot" + gibberish) exposes the path
4. if I include a valid, existent .html file which is located in the directory /usr/share/elog/themes/default/, and call it, elog exposes the html document. Example: I created an html file called gibberish.html (containing <html><body><p>Hello world</p></body></html>) in my system's /usr/share/elog/themes/default/ directory. After navigating back to the /gibberish.html URL, I was presented with the HTML file.
Turning on -v (verbose mode), the response by elogd when accessing these are: "GET /elog/gibberish.html HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays "Hello world" html file), and "GET /elog/gibberish.asdfasd HTTP/1.0 Returned 605 bytes" (displays red error box).
=====
My guess: the program seems to be caring about the files ONLY if they have html file extension. Please see the screenshots below.
====
What are the security implications? Not much, I think. From what I can tell, exposing the "/usr/share/themes/elog" path, and also exposing the elog version when the file does not exist. Hope this reply helps anyone else with the same question.
(I am sure the error exposing the version can be removed by editing the source code--this is probably beyond my capabilities at this point).
|
|
|
|
|