| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
839
|
Thu Dec 9 11:40:05 2004 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Other | 2.5.5-2 | Re: dropdown-lists display only the first 100 entries |
> > Right. Number of options is limited to 100.
> hi, i found the MAX_N_LIST macro and increased it
Please note that if you make it too big, you will get a stack overflow and
elogd will crash. |
|
66846
|
Thu Jun 10 15:19:51 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor?
|
What is a drop-in replacement? |
|
66848
|
Thu Jul 1 22:59:41 2010 |
| Bill Pier | bpier@clove.org | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor?
|
What is a drop-in replacement?
|
A configuration option to specify a different/alternate javascript based editor. |
|
66849
|
Fri Jul 2 08:55:11 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor?
|
What is a drop-in replacement?
|
A configuration option to specify a different/alternate javascript based editor.
|
Then the answer is no. |
|
66856
|
Thu Jul 22 15:51:50 2010 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor?
|
What is a drop-in replacement?
|
A configuration option to specify a different/alternate javascript based editor.
|
There is an firefox addon "It's all text" that allows you to call your own editor for all textarea fields in the browser.
If you then choose "plain" or "ELCode" encoding in ELOG for a new entry or to modifiy an existing entry, you can use your favourite editor to edit the entry by an new "EDIT" button associated with the textarea input field. It works simply by temporary files.
Not really a "drop-in" replacement, but similar.
|
|
68220
|
Tue Jan 12 21:07:59 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: drag and drop attachments not working with web server authentication |
Have a look here: elog:68014
| Devin Bougie wrote: |
| Hello, The "Drop attachments here..." section does not work when using Webserver authentication. Both elog 3.1.1 (the binary RPM) and apache are running on EL6.6 and are configured according to the docs. Authentication works fine and the normal "Choose File - Upload" attachment table works fine. However, when dragging an attachment to the "Drop attachments here..." section the dashes on the border turn green but when dropping the attachment nothing happens. If we revert to File authentication, everything works fine. I don't see any errors in our elog or apache log files. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Devin |
|
|
68221
|
Tue Jan 12 21:13:54 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: drag and drop attachments not working with web server authentication |
Thanks, Stefan. I read that before asking my question, but didn't see a resolution in that thread. I am already at 3.1.1, and I am testing on a clean installation. Are you saying that the solution is in the development branch after the release of 3.1.1?
Thanks again,
Devin |
|
68222
|
Tue Jan 12 21:19:25 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: drag and drop attachments not working with web server authentication |
No. What the thread says is first try this forum, see if you can drag and drop here. If not, you have a problem on your browser. If yes, you have somewhere some old JavaScript file around. Might be in the cache of your browser.
| Devin Bougie wrote: |
|
Thanks, Stefan. I read that before asking my question, but didn't see a resolution in that thread. I am already at 3.1.1, and I am testing on a clean installation. Are you saying that the solution is in the development branch after the release of 3.1.1?
Thanks again,
Devin
|
|