ELOG Forum

Demo Discussion

Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities

Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 213 of 796

Not logged in

Find | Login | Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments

6363 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 212, 213, 214 ... 794, 795, 796 Next

Thu Feb 9 09:09:30 2006

Chris Warner wrote:

The email address id correct. I am using an Elog Binary. I don't have the source code.

Ok, so I removed the SIZE=xxx parameter, which is not strictly necessary anyhow I believe. So wait for the next release, and you can try.

1671

Thu Feb 9 09:12:44 2006

Re: Work on PAM Support?

Steve Jones wrote:

Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking at sample code.

Not really. I have two big issues higher on my list: XML database format and multithreaded HTTP server. From having a quick look to PAM, I was not sure how easy this would be to implement. If it's not too difficult, it could move higher in the priority list.

1675

Fri Feb 10 11:41:38 2006

Stefan Ritt

stefan.ritt@psi.ch

Info

Re: Posting without logging in!

Dimitris wrote:

Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can post as myself using this command, then shouldn't something be done about this?

Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works.

1676

Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006

Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:

Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris.

Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.

- Stefan

1679

Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006

Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:

Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?

Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great.

1681

Fri Feb 10 20:29:12 2006

Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:

Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().

So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used?

No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the

#ifdef OS_SOLARIS

  forkpty(...)
  {
    ...
  }

#endif

conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c

1683

Fri Feb 10 21:50:27 2006

Chris Warner wrote:

Do you have an ise when that will be?

In about a week from now.

1686

Fri Feb 10 22:35:20 2006

Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Steve Jones wrote:

BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile does not work on Solaris

OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
.
.
.
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),solaris)

At least, not on our solaris systems. 'uname' returns SunOS.

Ok, what about adding:

ifeq ($(OSTYPE),SunOS)
OSTYPE=solaris
endif

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 212, 213, 214 ... 794, 795, 796 Next

ELOG V3.1.5-2eba886