ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68084
|
Sat Aug 15 00:00:36 2015 |
| John Krautkramer | john.krautkramer@micrel.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | IE 11 - Text Edit Toolbar Not Working | Hi,
I've been exploring elog. I find when using IE 11, the text editor formatting buttons don't work with HTML encoding selected. The entire toolbar is grayed out. It appears to work fine with Chrome. Any ideas or direction to look? elog v3.1.1 is running on RedHat EL5. I've tried the rpm installation, and source code compilation and installation with no change.
Any input would be greatly apriciated!
John |
68083
|
Thu Aug 13 10:06:23 2015 |
| Philip Leung | philip.leung@cern.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Re: Isolating search urls | Thanks for the quick response!
It's great to hear that multi-threading is in the works as this has been my main issue with an otherwise very nice piece of software. I do, however, feel like we should be able to get my slightly hacky approach to work to hold us over until you finish.
The idea is to run separate ELOG instances in read-only mode dedicated to these types of requests. I've managed to sync up the logbook indexation of each instance so now, unless there's some statefulness to ELOG that I'm forgetting about, I only need to make sure that requests are forwarded to the right instance.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough (=months) you might get what you want.
Philip Leung wrote: |
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip
|
|
|
Draft
|
Thu Aug 13 10:05:22 2015 |
| Philip Leung | philip.leung@cern.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Re: Isolating search urls | Thanks for the quick response!
The idea is to run multiple instances of elog where
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough (=months) you might get what you want.
Philip Leung wrote: |
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip
|
|
|
68081
|
Thu Aug 13 08:41:57 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Re: Show attachments = 0 | That's strange. If you use HTML or ELCode encoding, attachments are automatically hidden if they are used inline. So no "Show attachments = 0" necessary! I just tried that with the demo logbook and here is how it looks:

As you can see, there is no attachment shown in the full view. This is actually handled by the function "is_inline_attachment()" in elogd.c. I don't know if you can do debugging, but somehow this inline test won't work for you and the question is why. Can you try the simple configuration from the demo logbook and see if you still have the problem? Can you show me an example when this does not work. I need to reproduce your problem exactly in order to fix it.
Stefan
Eric Quintero wrote: |
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit.
|
|
68080
|
Wed Aug 12 23:44:16 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Show attachments = 0 | I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit. |
68079
|
Wed Aug 12 17:19:45 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Re: Isolating search urls | I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough (=months) you might get what you want.
Philip Leung wrote: |
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip
|
|
68078
|
Wed Aug 12 16:59:30 2015 |
| Philip Leung | philip.leung@cern.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Isolating search urls | Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip |
68077
|
Wed Aug 12 10:54:27 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | v3.1.0.3 | Re: Problem with elog and Internet Explorer when saving an entry | Do you have the problem on this Forum as well?
If not, then something is wrong with your installation. Like old JavaScipt files etc. Start with a fresh installation and you should be fine.
If you have the same problem in this Forum, let me know and I will further investigate it.
TorstenJ wrote: |
Hello Stefan,
thanks for you reply. I tried an ujpdate today to my old installation, but also after cleaning the IE cache, the problem consists. The same result is, when doing a clean new installation, with the default elog.cfg and and cleaned cache as well an IE that was reseted to defaults.
I am running version v3.1.1 3f311c5 now. Do you maybe have another idea, to fix that issue.
Thanks
Torsten
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
This issue should have been fixed in the new version 3.1.1. If the problem still persists, try to clear your browser's cache, since it might still have cached the old JavaScript files having this bug.
TorstenJ wrote: |
Hi all,
first off all let me say, that I realy like this great tool. That is a lot of help for keeping our server documentation up-to-date. Thanks to all contributors for that.
I right here, because I actually have an issue with saving entries working with IE11 (but also in IE9). When ever I enter an entry, and click the save button, the page open a page with the text: "OK 1" or the second attemp: "OK 2" 3rd "OK 3" and so on (see screenshot). To get back to my Item list, I have to click the back button in the internet explorer. I also opens a lot of draft entries in my databases. When I submit my entry, I don't have an issue, and the entry is saved correctly.
This issue doesn't happen when using Google Chrome.
Had anyone an simlar issue using elog with IE? It would be great to have some help with that issue.
Thanks
Torsten
|
|
|
|
|