Strange timezone in email sent with Postfix, posted by Joseph Giaime on Thu Jan 29 00:24:44 2004
|
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting a sensible timezone to be attached to e-mail that
gets sent out when messages are posted. I'm using Postfix, not sendmail
(Mac
OS X Server uses this beginning with version 10.3). In this set-up,
the 'sendmail' program is a front-end for Postfix, not the real thing. I
suspect |
Re: Strange timezone in email sent with Postfix, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 29 09:25:45 2004
|
> Instead of something like "Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:46:16 -0600", the
> "-0600" is replaced by a large number that doesn't correspond with anything
> I can figure out. This is the sort of thing that does no real harm, but the
|
whishlist direct shortcut to select a files or folder (not http), posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Wed Dec 3 06:32:09 2003
|
whishlist
an entry like
|
|
Re: whishlist direct shortcut to select a files or folder (not http), posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 3 09:18:25 2003
|
> an entry like
> file:///E:/Dossier\!!shorcut
> will open IE with these current adresse
|
|
Re: whishlist direct shortcut to select a files or folder (not http), posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Wed Dec 3 14:57:05 2003
|
> > an entry like
> > file:///E:/Dossier\!!shorcut
> > will open IE with these current adresse
|
speed is very slow if logbook contains many entries, posted by Heiko Scheit on Wed Nov 12 12:25:44 2003 
|
This is not really a bug, but elogd was getting really slow with our
logbook. It took about 4 1/2 seconds just to get the default page in
threaded mode with 15 entries. The logbook has in total about 2000
|
|
Re: speed is very slow if logbook contains many entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 12 12:34:02 2003
|
This is a very nice measurement you made and helps me a lot. I will
incorporte your suggestions into the next version. Under Windows however,
there is no -HUP signal, so that won't work for them. But what I can easily
|
|
Re: speed is very slow if logbook contains many entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 20 17:55:57 2003
|
I implemented the new scheme where
- under Windows, the configuration is only checked once every access
|
Re: speed is very slow if logbook contains many entries, posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Mon Nov 24 10:25:10 2003
|
> I implemented the new scheme where
>
> - under Windows, the configuration is only checked once every access
|
|
Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Christopher Jones on Sun Oct 12 08:37:00 2003
|
Hi,
We have been using Elog successfully as a shiftlog book for over a month
|
|
Re: Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Oct 26 17:04:59 2003
|
> We have been using Elog successfully as a shiftlog book for over a month
> now, but I recently ran into an annoying bug, I think.
> We had a thread that was created and was being replied to over several
|
|
Re: Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 11 13:49:50 2003
|
I found a stack overflow if there are too many replies. This has been fixed in
the current CVS verson of elogd.c and will be incorporated into the next release. |
|
Re: Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Christopher Jones on Fri Nov 21 07:59:50 2003
|
> I found a stack overflow if there are too many replies. This has been fixed in
> the current CVS verson of elogd.c and will be incorporated into the next release.
|
|
Update request for Admin Guide, posted by Justin Dieters on Tue Nov 18 23:19:57 2003
|
Heya, I've been using elog for a year or so, with a proxy through Apache,
but recently I've ran into some trouble with my Apache config, where
spammers were using my incorrectly configured proxy to send spam.
|
|
Re: Update request for Admin Guide, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 20 17:51:53 2003
|
| Thanks, I added a note into the admin guide. |
elog.exe , posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Wed Nov 12 07:52:45 2003
|
impossible to create the moptions with
-a Type#0="%D1%"
|
|
Re: elog.exe , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 19 09:06:11 2003
|
> impossible to create the moptions with
>
> -a Type#0="%D1%"
|
|
FreeBSD Install, posted by Jason on Sun Sep 21 09:33:46 2003
|
I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
|
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Sep 21 09:53:56 2003
|
Unfortunately I don't have access to a FreeBSD box so I cannot try. But I
thought the GNU make is the same on Linux and FreeBSD???
|
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by G on Tue Sep 23 01:10:17 2003
|
I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
|
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by Dave Truesdell on Sun Oct 26 18:32:17 2003
|
> I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
> I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
> the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by G on Tue Oct 28 22:40:28 2003
|
Thanks for that mate, compiled elog on FreeBSD 5.1 myself no problems just like
you said, great!
|
|
Groups on the first page, posted by Robert Keeney on Thu Oct 23 13:59:54 2003
|
I would very much like to list groups instead of the individual logs on the
firs page you see after login.
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Oct 23 20:40:11 2003
|
> I would very much like to list groups instead of the individual logs on the
> firs page you see after login.
>
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri Oct 24 14:08:47 2003
|
I think I would like: Only groups. When you click on a group, a secondary page
shows up showing logs in that group.
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 24 17:02:06 2003
|
> I think I would like: Only groups. When you click on a group, a secondary page
> shows up showing logs in that group.
>
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri Oct 24 21:02:54 2003
|
OK, I'm willing to give a shot but I don't know how to do it. I'll look in the docs and
see if I can figure it out. Thanks.
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri Oct 24 21:22:11 2003
|
I don't see anyway to define a log as an attribute. May be I just don't understand
something. I have more than 50 logs anyway.
|
|
Re: Groups on the first page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Oct 25 10:01:14 2003
|
> I don't see anyway to define a log as an attribute. May be I just don't understand
> something. I have more than 50 logs anyway.
|