| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1676
|
Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. |
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.
- Stefan |
|
1678
|
Fri Feb 10 17:22:36 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. |
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.
- Stefan |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
|
|
1679
|
Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great. |
|
1680
|
Fri Feb 10 20:24:56 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great. |
Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used? |
|
1681
|
Fri Feb 10 20:29:12 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used? |
No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the
#ifdef OS_SOLARIS
forkpty(...)
{
...
}
#endif
conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c |
|
1684
|
Fri Feb 10 21:52:35 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used? |
No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the
#ifdef OS_SOLARIS
forkpty(...)
{
...
}
#endif
conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Got it. Much easier than how I was going about it.
|
|
|
|
1685
|
Fri Feb 10 22:31:38 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
So, since it seems to work under Linux, any idea which function is being used? |
No, there are no two forkpty() function, due to the
#ifdef OS_SOLARIS
forkpty(...)
{
...
}
#endif
conditional compiling. So if I compile under Linux, the variable OS_SOLARIS is not defined, and therefore the special forkpty does not get compiled. Instead the one from the library is taken, since under Linux I use the -libutil switch. Under Solaris, there is no -libutil, but the OS_SOLARIS gets set, and therefore we have the code right inside elogd.c
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Got it. Much easier than how I was going about it.
|
|
|
BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile does not work on Solaris
OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
.
.
.
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),solaris)
At least, not on our solaris systems. 'uname' returns SunOS. When I run 'make -P' or 'gmake -P' the environment variable 'OSTYPE' is already set to 'solaris'. This is the reason the original Makefile did not work on our solaris systems. I'm not sure if this is universal but it applies to the systems we run (Solaris 8 and 9). |
|
1686
|
Fri Feb 10 22:35:20 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile does not work on Solaris
OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
.
.
.
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),solaris)
At least, not on our solaris systems. 'uname' returns SunOS. |
Ok, what about adding:
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),SunOS)
OSTYPE=solaris
endif |
|