| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
67949
|
Thu Jun 4 16:25:42 2015 |
 | David Wallis | wallis@aps.anl.gov | Question | Windows | 3.1 | Re: LDAP docs |
This is what I've been able to figure out, in terms of the elogd.cfg file:
LDAP server = server.domain:389
LDAP userbase = ou=people,o=domain.com,dc=domain,dc=com
LDAP login attribute = uid
LDAP register = 0
| Stephen G wrote: |
|
Could someone point me to the LDAP configuration docs, I searched to no avail. I'm sure there is some big red ldap config button it, but I just can't find it.
|
|
|
67948
|
Thu Jun 4 00:10:32 2015 |
 | Stephen G | s@g.com | Question | Windows | 3.1 | Duplicate: LDAP docs |
This is a duplicate, made by mistake.
Could someone point me to the LDAP configuration docs, I searched to no avail. I'm sure there is some big red ldap config button it, but I just can't find it. |
|
67947
|
Thu Jun 4 00:08:56 2015 |
| Stephen G | swgallman@bpa.gov | Question | Windows | 3.1 | LDAP docs |
Could someone point me to the LDAP configuration docs, I searched to no avail. I'm sure there is some big red ldap config button it, but I just can't find it. |
|
67946
|
Fri May 29 22:32:20 2015 |
 | Jacky Li | zli@hawaii.edu | Question | Linux | V3.1.0-241 | subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new? |
Hi,
I updated an old elog entry and resubmit it as new by checking the box resubmit as new. Does the subject line should said it is a "New ELOG entry" instead of "Updated ELOG entry"? Thank you.
Also when some people submit a new elog, the subject line is "Updated ELOG entry". This is a bit odd. I can't reproduce that bug when I did my test.
Jacky |
|
67945
|
Fri May 29 09:46:11 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.0-2 | ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted |
I wanted to reply to the post "Three problems..." and then changed my mind.
But since this logbook does not allow to delete entries (not even my own) I was neither able to remove the draft
nor the final entry.
Another strange thing: the draft got submitted when I hit the "Back" button after reopening it.
Cheers
Andreas |
|
67944
|
Fri May 29 09:38:40 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Request | Other | 3.1.0 | ELOG Version field in elogs/Forum |
Hi Stefan,
could we change the format of the "ELOG Version" field in this logbook, that one can enter the full git revision
number?
That would be 13 characters.
Cheers
Andreas |
|
67943
|
Thu May 28 17:28:20 2015 |
| David Wallis | wallis@aps.anl.gov | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-2 | Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2) |
I just updated to the latest official release (V3.1.0-2411f95) and have this problem:
The Time Stamp button pastes the logbook name when "Time format" is not specified in elogd.cfg, and when it is set to "%m/%d/%Y %H:%M", it adds the string "5/28/."
My users are loving the new functionality added in 3.1! |
|
67942
|
Wed May 27 14:22:11 2015 |
| Edmund Hertle | edmund.hertle@kit.edu | Question | All | 3.1 | Formatting multiple datetime entries |
Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the measurement script.
Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format = %H:%M:%S
For better visual appearance I would like to only display the time on the two additional datetime fields but keep the full date and time on the standard date field. Using the "Time format" option will influence all three at once.
Is there an option to do something like the time format for individual attributes (similar to the syntax of adding comments etc)?
Example:Attributes = Time Start, Time End
Type Time Start = datetime
Type Time End = datetime
Time format Time Start = %H:%M:%S
Time format Time End = %H:%M:%S
|