| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1403
|
Thu Sep 1 18:26:38 2005 |
 | ralphb | elog@spampot.com | Comment | | | Re: something for the wishlist: 'Recent Changes' |
| Heiko Scheit wrote: | A 'Recent Changes'-link (option) that lists entries that were changed
recently, where 'recent' can be changed from 1,2,3...(some maximum)
days. |
Two possible solutions:
1. Use ELOG's RSS support (look for "RSS Title" in the config syntax help). I added an RSS icon to each entry with "Bottom Text=<a href="http://myserver:8080/mylogbook/elog.rdf"><img border=0 height="14" width="36" src="/Rssicon_3614.gif" alt="[RSS]"></a>
2. Add a new attribute "Revised" and config it as follows: "Locked attributes = Revised" and "Subst on Edit Revised = $date". It'll get updated each time the entry gets updated. Then all you just need to create a link to "http://yourserver:8080/yourlogbook/page?mode=summary&rsort=Revised"
Best regards, Ralph. |
|
1591
|
Fri Jan 13 02:37:10 2006 |
 | Chris Warner | christopher_warner@dcd.uscourts.gov | Comment | Linux | | Re: LDAP |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Carl Shirey wrote: | I know you want to make ELOG a stand alone program. But is there a way to still make a stand alone but have the option work with LDAP?
FYI
Elog works great we us it for our shift carryover and we have about 25 people useing it and I have heard no complants with it.
Thanks |
I added your vote to the "PAM" authentication on the wishlist, since PAM contains an LDAP module. |
Please Add my vote too. I think that would be great. |
|
1615
|
Fri Jan 20 02:53:40 2006 |
 | Chris Warner | christopher_warner@dcd.uscourts.gov | Comment | Linux | 2.6 | Re: Buffer Overflow? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Chris Warner wrote: | Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was a problem in previous versions. Was it not fixed in 2.6?
To recreate enter http://yourhost.yourdomain.com/../../../../etc/passwd
view your password file in the browser.
If this was previously reported, is there a fix?
Chris Warner |
Thanks for telling me, I didn't know. I was able to reproduce your problem under certain conditions, and I just released version 2.6.1 to fix it. However it has nothing to do with an old buffer overflow (see elog:941).
I would strongly advise everybody to upgrade as soon as possible. |
Thanks for the quick response! |
|
1732
|
Tue Feb 28 11:26:22 2006 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Comment | Windows | 2.6.1-1668 | Re: MOptions problem ? |
> Hi Holger,
>
> > Which ELOG version do you use?
> I'am using the version V2.6.1-1653 of Elog
>
> > From which logbook are the screenshots? (I assume it's Liste - right?)
> Right :)!
>
> I've just seen that Stefan has build a V2.6.1-1663 version of ELOG.
> I try to install this new version and gave you answer as soon as possible :)!
Now I'am using the Elog V2.6.1-1668 and same probleme.
I think it's a data problem. I have edited my logbooks\Liste\050302a.log with an Hexadecimal editor and found one
carruage return juste before the |
|
1810
|
Sat Apr 15 00:37:48 2006 |
| Marco Calf | marco@kelf.nl.eu.org | Comment | Linux | 2.5.7 | User review..use case: implementing GTD |
Playing with elog for a day made me very happy. I was looking for a webbased thingy to support list building for 'Getting Things Done' by David Allen ( David Allen's Getting Things Done ).
Elog is simple, intuitative and very powerfull!
Less informative is the fact that i found no bugs till now 
On usablitity..maybe some more control over the dialog..eg the 'in between' screens (eg after a move...the 'to which log i would like to resume' question)...or have an option to be in select mode by default.
Tnx |
|
1878
|
Fri Jul 14 20:29:21 2006 |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Comment | Linux | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Inserting images via Internet Explorer |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.
When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] . |
This is a problem of the JavaScript implementation of Internet Explorer. After some externsive research I found now a way to convince IE to do the right thing. The fix is contains in SVN revision 1701 and will be released with 2.6.2-2 soon. |
Great job !
I tried the SVN revision 1701, and it works perfectly.
Thank you for all your effort.
Regards,
Elaine |
|
1882
|
Mon Jul 17 13:44:37 2006 |
 | Gerald Ebberink | g.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nl | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
|
1883
|
Mon Jul 17 13:49:37 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Re: Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
| Gerald Ebberink wrote: | Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
This is on purpuse. The Duplicate functionality is ment to "clone" an existing entry, to save some typing work if an existing entry contains most of what one wants in a new entry. If one duplicates a reply, it is detached from the original thread, so there is not entry to attach the duplicate to. I guess you want to make a new reply to an existing entry, and then have another existing reply as a template for that, but this is not possible. If I would not drop the "in reply to" value, the duplicate would point to the wrong entry. |