| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1985
|
Thu Oct 12 16:34:07 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
220 xxx.psi.ch xxxvs01 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
HELO xxx.psi.ch
250 xxx.psi.ch Hello [129.129.xxx.xxx]
MAIL FROM: stefan.ritt@psi.ch
250 2.1.0 stefan.ritt@psi.ch....Sender OK
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
To: "Stefan Ritt" <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
From: Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
User-Agent: Elog Version 2.6.2
Subject: Updated ELOG entry
X-Elog-URL: http://localhost:8080/demo/1
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
... here comes the complete email body ....
.
250 2.6.0 <xxx.psi.ch> Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
221 2.0.0 xxx.psi.ch Service closing transmission channel
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1724
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Content-Length: 20
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25. |
All server I met so far were running on port 25, so I hardcoded this in elogd.c. You can change it in the source code at line 2119:
bind_addr.sin_port = htons((short) 25);
If more people ask for this, I can make it a parameter. |
|
1987
|
Fri Oct 13 16:59:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | Hope this helps a little... |
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |
|
1990
|
Mon Oct 16 08:57:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want. |
I tried but I was unable to obtain a free account. Furthermore, the problem is probably related to your SMTP server's authentication method. There are many methods and ELOG only supports a subset. So I would have to try with your specific SMTP server. So the only recommendation I can give you is to find an SMTP server without authentication. That one will certainly work with elog. |
|
1992
|
Mon Oct 16 16:53:43 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | | I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here? |
The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, it will help if you post such long entries just in "plain" form.
- Stefan |
|
1993
|
Mon Oct 16 17:18:58 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
- Stefan |
|
1996
|
Tue Oct 17 09:14:41 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
| Arckonit wrote: | | I know the use "use email heading" and other, but i would like to configure the body of the mail, where there is the link, the name of the author, etc. |
Following options can be used to format the email body:
- Use Email heading = ...
- Use Email Subject = ...
- Email attributes = ...
- Email encoding = ...
- Email format = ...
Probably the last one is the one you are looking for... |
|
1998
|
Tue Oct 17 09:32:21 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2 | Re: Email format |
| Arckonit wrote: | Thanx for the quick answer
Email format = ?
Where can i find some help to use this feature ? |
RTFM!
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#flags search for Email format |
|
2002
|
Tue Oct 17 13:12:52 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.6.2-1723 | Re: Date format in Threaded display |
That fix for Steve Jones was slightly different, it had to do with substitutions in threaded display. I fixed yours now in revision 1734, so give it a try.
Salut,
Stefan |