ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66254
|
Wed Mar 18 04:23:41 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Adding texts for each attachment |
Dongwook Jang wrote: |
Dear Stefan,
Maybe I used elog with very inefficient way so far. The way you suggested requires putting figures somewhere else, right?
Elog saves attachments on the machine that elog is running. I want to store figures in elog.
The logo you showed above is stored in this entry?
Thank you.
Dongwook Jang
|
If you embed an image (via the "insert image" button in the task bar) this image is stored as an attachment, but the actualy attachment is hidden and the image is shown in-line. Yes, it is stored on the server where elogd runs.
|
66255
|
Wed Mar 18 04:37:19 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Find usage |
Mike Forster wrote: |
Hello Stefan and Elog fans,
Is there a way to find entries with the words program and error when then are not contiguous in the text?
Thanks,
--Mike
|
Please have a look at
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66151
does this help? |
66262
|
Tue Mar 24 08:14:48 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.5 | Re: Storing Elog database files in version control (CVS/SVN/GIT)? |
Brett Viren wrote: | Hi,
Is it possible to store ELOG back-end database files in version control so as to synchronize multiple ELOG
instances?
Has anyone tried it? Any obvious show stoppers to such an approach?
Cheers,
-Brett. |
I acknowledge that mirroring through SSL is highly requested, I will try to do my best to implement it. Doing it with version control on the back-end files is not such a good idea. After each synchronization you would have to restart the elogd servers, since they don't realize if the files got changed "under their feet". Furthermore, if you have changes on both sides on different entries for the same day, you have a conflict which you have to solve manually with an editor on the raw files. The elog synchronization works on the entry level, not on the file level. So if two different entries for the same day are changed on both servers, they are combined properly without conflict. Only if the same message got modified on both sides, elog reports a conflict and you have to choose one version or the other. |
66263
|
Tue Mar 24 10:34:14 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.7.3 | Re: Escape emoticons in ELCODE |
Gernot Buselmeier wrote: |
Hi,
I want to write a text like "John:Doe" in ELCODE. However the ":D" is converted to a LOL emoticon. I tried various ways to escape this. One solution I found was entering "John\:Doe". However, the upper-case D is converted to lower-case: the result reads "John:doe".
Thanks for an answer and many thanks for providing ELOG.
Gernot
|
Thanks for reporting this bug. I fixed it in revision #2180. |
66264
|
Tue Mar 24 10:42:25 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.7.4 | Re: "Full" view formatting |
Erik Iverson wrote: | I have a logbook I use to capture machine settings. There are many (~30) different attributes defined. I've defined the "Summary" view via "List display" in such a way that not all the attributes are displayed in the summary list, because there's no practical way to fit the 30 different attributes in 30 rows across the screen, and there's no need to have every attribute shown in the summary view. I would like to define something for the "Full" view that lets me put one (or more, but not all) attributes per line; much like the single-entry view does now, just with multiple entries. So a "Full" listing would look like
ID: 1
Attribute1: Value1
Attribute2: Value2
Attribute3: Value3
Text...
ID: 2
Attribute1: Value1
Attribute2: Value2
Attribute3: Value3
Text...
rather than
ID Attribute1 Attribute2 Attribute3
1 Value1 Value2 Value3
Text...
2 Value1 Value2 Value3
Text...
etc.
Any suggestions?
Thanks as always for a wonderful piece of software! |
This is not implemented, but I will consider it for a future version. |
66265
|
Tue Mar 24 10:43:02 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Find usage |
Mike Forster wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Mike Forster wrote: |
Hello Stefan and Elog fans,
Is there a way to find entries with the words program and error when then are not contiguous in the text?
Thanks,
--Mike
|
Please have a look at
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66151
does this help?
|
Hello Stefan,
I am looking for the same answer that Yoichi was looking for. For instance, could the text keyword filtering be looped so that the first group of results is then filtered by the next keyword?
--Mike
|
No, that's not possible unfortunately. |
66266
|
Tue Mar 24 11:44:10 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.5 | Re: Hiding Comments on the Logbook Selection Page |
Adam Blandford wrote: |
Hi
I was just wondering if there was a way that the comments for a logbook could be set to be invisible on the Selection page but then displayed once a user has logged in to a particular logbook?
This is required for security purposes. I want a common login page which shows all logbooks, where the logbook names only have meaning for people who know them but then once logged in the comment provides additional information about that logbook.
Thanks
Adam
|
Ok, I implemented a new option "Hide comments = 1" in SVN revision #2182, which will be included in the next release of elog. |
66269
|
Wed Mar 25 08:31:17 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2175 | Re: New column on main page |
Dinkel Markus wrote: |
Hi,
is it possible to create a new column on the main page? Between "Logbuch" and "Einträge" I need the new column for enter the IP from the servers.

Thanks for your help
Markus
|
You can use the "Comment = ..." option to add something below "Logbuch" like I did here:
|