ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67775
|
Wed Jan 28 17:18:08 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Strange. If I attach a big image to this post (see below), I see the thumbnail, but when I click on it it, I get redirected to the full resolution image. No idea why it is not working for you.
|
Sorry, I wasn't sufficiently clear. The issue I mentioned only applied to images that are inlined in the body of the post using the "Image" button in the CKeditor toolbar.
Oddly enough, on this logbook, I am not able to upload an image in that way; after selecting the image and pressing "Send it to the Server," nothing happens. |
67793
|
Fri Jan 30 22:45:02 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments |
Since I am unable to attach an image to this logbook, I made a post over the the Linux Demo logbook showing an image that was uploaded with the CKeditor toolbar "Image" button that doesn't link to the full resolution image.
Incidentially, Dario Milicic's recent commit to the git repository (83a10a5), adds the exact functionality I'm looking for to drag-and-drop attachments with the "dndfiles" CKeditor plugin. I've looked througe the "image2" code myself, but I don't have much experience with javascript, and haven't figure out how to do the equivalent for that plugin.
Thanks for your time. |
67800
|
Wed Feb 4 08:51:37 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments |
You make a valid point!
My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.
For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you
|
|
68105
|
Mon Aug 31 17:14:08 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Re: Show attachments = 0 |
The automatic hiding behavior is what I'm after, and I've discovered that it is only a problem for PDF attachments. I have reproduced this on the demo logbook on git revision f828049.
I've taken a look at the source you mentioned, but as far as I can tell, it is just looking for the opening of the img tag in the HTML source, and I'm not sure why that is different for a PDF. |
68146
|
Fri Oct 16 00:24:50 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Re: Show attachments = 0 |
Hm, looking through the source, there are many many places where PDF files are treated differently than strictly image filetypes (PNG, etc.). This makes sense in the context of multi-page documents.
Still, I like using PDFs for vector plots... I suppose I should also confess to the following modification I've made to my ELOG for treating PDFs like images in drag-and-drop uploading.
--- a/scripts/ckeditor/plugins/dndfiles/plugin.js
+++ b/scripts/ckeditor/plugins/dndfiles/plugin.js
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ CKEDITOR.plugins.add( 'dndfiles', {
return;
if(src.indexOf(".png") >= 0 || src.indexOf(".jpg") >= 0 || src.indexOf(".jpeg") >= 0
- || src.indexOf(".gif") >= 0 || src.indexOf(".svg") >= 0) { // This is an image
+ || src.indexOf(".gif") >= 0 || src.indexOf(".svg") >= 0 || src.indexOf(".pdf") >= 0) { // This is an image
html += '<a href = ' + src + '><img src = "' + thumb + '">' + '</a>';
} else { // this is not an image
// Server appends 14 characters in front of the name so we should remove them
|
66923
|
Thu Nov 4 13:23:50 2010 |
| Erik Butz | erik.butz@gmail.com | Question | Linux | V2.7.6-219 | elog command line submission |
Hi,
I am playing with the elog automatic subscription script, but somehow I am failing in submitting an entry.
I am using a syntax as this:
echo test | elog -h 127.0.0.1 -p 8085 -d /usr/local/elogbooks/Elog -l "Sub Elog" -a "Type=MyType" -x -u user passwd
and I get a message which says:
"cannot get host name: Success"
which seems contradictory and also there is no entry submitted.
The command is executed on the host where the elog is running, the port and directory are taken from the cfg File.
What is my mistake, where is my misunderstanding of the documentation?
Any hints appreciated.
Erik |
68039
|
Fri Jul 3 21:26:32 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Info | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Re: ELOG and Gmail? |
Using stunnel4 and the 3.1.0 version of elog, I was able to use gmail smtp without the use of iptables.
In my elogd.cfg I chose:
SMTP username = <gmailusername>@gmail.com
SMTP Password = <The hash produced with the perl statement posted by Christopher Lee>
SMTP host = 127.0.0.1
And in /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf:
[elogssl]
client = yes
accept = 127.0.0.1:25
connect = smtp.gmail.com:465
verify = 2
CApath = /etc/ssl/certs
FInally, run sudo stunnel4. |
68040
|
Tue Jul 7 21:57:04 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Customized email subject line for an updated entry |
Hi,
The default email subject line for a new entry is: "New ELOG entry", and the default email subject line for an edited entry is: "Updated ELOG entry". However when we set "Use Email Subject", both new entries and the updated entries use the same email subject. Is there an equivalent of "Use Email Heading Edit" for the subject line? I tried "Use Email Subject Edit", to no avail.
Thanks in advance,
e. |