ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66243
|
Mon Mar 9 18:58:18 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.5 | Re: Login issue |
Heinzmann wrote: |
Heinzmann wrote: |
Heinzmann wrote: |
Hi,
I have found the issue, when I mark at the login page:
Keep me logged in on this computer
for the next 41 days or until I log out
I'm not able to login. Only when it is not marked I'm able to login.
How can I diable/hide the part (Keep me logged in on this computer
for the next 41 days or until I log out) from my login page?I
Issue solved: Login expiration = 0
|
|
|
Great, you found it! The original problem is probably related to your cookie handling. If you don't check the "keep me logged it" box, elog generates a temporary cookie, which is used for the duration of your browser session, then the browser discards it. If you theck the box, a persistent cookie is created, which your browser stores in the cookie database and reuses it for the coming 41 days. I believe you have a problem there (persistent cookies not allowed, disk full, whatever...) which does not allow handling of persistent cookies. Try from anohter browser/computer and you will see that it works. |
66245
|
Tue Mar 10 16:33:52 2009 |
| Heinzmann | catman333@web.de | Question | Mac OSX | V2.7.5-217 | Re: Restrict edit - issue |
Heinzmann wrote: |
Problem solved, I had to set the 'preset funktion' additionally |
|
66247
|
Wed Mar 11 15:51:36 2009 |
| Heinzmann | catman333@web.de | Question | Windows | V2.7.5-217 | How ca I delete / hide the Elog Icon and Labels like ELOG V2.7.5-2175 |
Hi Stephan,
How can I delete / hide the Elog Icon 
and Labels like ELOG V2.7.5-2175 ?
Thanks,
Michael
|
66249
|
Thu Mar 12 21:21:00 2009 |
| Heinzmann | catman333@web.de | Question | Windows | V2.7.5-217 | Re: How ca I delete / hide the Elog Icon and Labels like ELOG V2.7.5-2175 |
Heinzmann wrote: |
Hi Stephan,
How can I delete / hide the Elog Icon 
and Labels like ELOG V2.7.5-2175 ?
Thanks,
Michael
|
Sorry,
found it:
Bottom text = <center>Hello</center>
Bottom text login = <center>Login Hello</center> |
66250
|
Fri Mar 13 13:45:22 2009 |
| Mike Forster | mike4ster@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Find usage |
Hello Stefan and Elog fans,
Is there a way to find entries with the words program and error when then are not contiguous in the text?
Thanks,
--Mike |
66255
|
Wed Mar 18 04:37:19 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Find usage |
Mike Forster wrote: |
Hello Stefan and Elog fans,
Is there a way to find entries with the words program and error when then are not contiguous in the text?
Thanks,
--Mike
|
Please have a look at
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66151
does this help? |
66256
|
Wed Mar 18 15:40:17 2009 |
| Mike Forster | mike4ster@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Find usage |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Mike Forster wrote: |
Hello Stefan and Elog fans,
Is there a way to find entries with the words program and error when then are not contiguous in the text?
Thanks,
--Mike
|
Please have a look at
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66151
does this help?
|
Hello Stefan,
I am looking for the same answer that Yoichi was looking for. For instance, could the text keyword filtering be looped so that the first group of results is then filtered by the next keyword?
--Mike |
66257
|
Thu Mar 19 02:50:16 2009 |
| Erik Iverson | eiverson@ornl.gov | Question | All | 2.7.4 | "Full" view formatting |
I have a logbook I use to capture machine settings. There are many (~30) different attributes defined. I've defined the "Summary" view via "List display" in such a way that not all the attributes are displayed in the summary list, because there's no practical way to fit the 30 different attributes in 30 rows across the screen, and there's no need to have every attribute shown in the summary view. I would like to define something for the "Full" view that lets me put one (or more, but not all) attributes per line; much like the single-entry view does now, just with multiple entries. So a "Full" listing would look like
ID: 1
Attribute1: Value1
Attribute2: Value2
Attribute3: Value3
Text...
ID: 2
Attribute1: Value1
Attribute2: Value2
Attribute3: Value3
Text...
rather than
ID Attribute1 Attribute2 Attribute3
1 Value1 Value2 Value3
Text...
2 Value1 Value2 Value3
Text...
etc.
Any suggestions?
Thanks as always for a wonderful piece of software! |