Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 247 of 804  Not logged in ELOG logo
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67810   Wed Feb 18 04:57:32 2015 Question Alan Grantagrant@winnipeg.caQuestionWindows2.9.2Elog stability with multiple users

Are there any known or reported daemon stability issues with an increase of concurrent users logged in to view and search entries, while the elog client is also adding 5 to 10 new entries every minute during a peak 2-hour period each day?

  67809   Fri Feb 13 21:18:46 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportMac OSX3.0.0Re: Fail to install in mac

Point your browser to http://localhost:8080 as written in the documentation

Alex wrote:

Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do

 

/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...


but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?

 

  67808   Fri Feb 13 20:36:59 2015 Reply Alexalkaloge@cern.chBug reportMac OSX3.0.0Re: Fail to install in mac

Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do

 

/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...


but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?

  67807   Fri Feb 13 19:47:43 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportMac OSX3.0.0Re: Fail to install in mac

Sorry I forgot to include the elogd.plist file in the distribution. I attached it to this entry, so just copy it into the elog root directory and run again "make install".

/Stefan

Alex wrote:

Hi

 

I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get

 

Installing example logbook to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
install: logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log -> /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log
install: elogd.plist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 71

 

Any idea why ?

 

Thanks

 

Alex

 

 

Attachment 1: elogd.plist
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
	<key>Label</key>
	<string>ch.psi.elogd</string>
	<key>ProgramArguments</key>
	<array>
		<string>/usr/local/sbin/elogd</string>
		<string>-c</string>
		<string>/usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg</string>
	</array>
	<key>RunAtLoad</key>
	<true/>
</dict>
</plist>
  67806   Fri Feb 13 16:43:00 2015 Question Alexalkaloge@cern.chBug reportMac OSX3.0.0Fail to install in mac

Hi

 

I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get

 

Installing example logbook to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
install: logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log -> /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log
install: elogd.plist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 71

 

Any idea why ?

 

Thanks

 

Alex

 

  67805   Wed Feb 4 13:32:21 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll3.0.0Re: Link to full resolution image attachments

I put the functionality you requested into the current GIT version of ELOG. It works now with Drag & Drop, but not (yet) with the toolbar uploader.

Eric Quintero wrote:

You make a valid point!

My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG. 

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.

For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you

 

 

  67804   Wed Feb 4 13:06:52 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows3.0.0Re: CSV question

Allowed encoding = 1

As written in the documentation (which you should read before asking questions here)

Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote:

so I assume there is a way to force member to use plain text mode, right?  :D

how to make my member force to use plain text?

thanx for help sir,

  67803   Wed Feb 4 10:33:16 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindows3.0.0Re: Permission on reply

Hi Banata,

If you only have a few people who can reply, then use

Allow reply = <user list>

and no need to produce a "Deny reply" list.

If most people are able to reply, but a few are *not* allowed to reply - bad behaviour or whatever - then the Deny reply list is more appropriate, and no need to generate an "Allow reply" userlist.

David.

Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote:

so let say I just want to add certain members for replying logbook, so I just need to add parameter Allow reply = <user list>

and automatically all members not listed will be forbidden, am I correct?

I dont need to specify members for "Deny Reply" right ?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You can use the switches

Alloe reply = <user list>

Deny reply = <user list>

to give only certain uses the right to use that command.

/Stefan

Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote:

is it possible to set reply only for certain member?

all members can submit lobook, but only certain member can make reply on it

thanx for help and so sorry if I have too many question :D

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6