Hi Stefan,

Must have missed it when the fixed/not fixed thread marking got implimented.

Anyhow, my main point would still apply for where the thread is not yet fixed, but is in one of a number of possible
states  (waiting, panic, work-in-progress....).  Clearly you can label the latest entry in a thread with the latest
status, and icon, but when in collapsed mode, you only see the initial entry.  If the latest entry were shown
(optionally), then one can tell at a glance in the collapsed listings which entry may need direct attention.



> > In the past I have requested the "mark whole thread" feature, not yet implimented.
> 
> That's not correct, it is implemented. Just add an attribute for that. Assume you have problem reports, so you 
> add
> 
> Attributes = ..., Fixed
> Options Fixed = boolean
> Quick filter = Fixed
> 
> If you add a new entry, "Fixed" is false by default. All replies to that entry will contain then the same flag. 
> Now if you want to mark the whole thread as fixed, do the following:
> 
> - go into list display
> - display all entries in threaded mode
> - click on "Select"
> - select the thread you want to mark as fixed and click "Edit"
> - now keep all attributes, but check the "Fixed" check box
> 
> and voila, the whole thread will contain "Fixed = 1". Using the quick filter, you can now show all fixed threads 
> with one click.

> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Must have missed it when the fixed/not fixed thread marking got implimented.
> 
> Anyhow, my main point would still apply for where the thread is not yet fixed, but is in one of a number of possible
> states  (waiting, panic, work-in-progress....).  Clearly you can label the latest entry in a thread with the latest
> status, and icon, but when in collapsed mode, you only see the initial entry.  If the latest entry were shown
> (optionally), then one can tell at a glance in the collapsed listings which entry may need direct attention.

If you always mark the whole thread with states (waiting, panic, work-in-progress,...) as described in my last posting, 
then you will see this from the thread initial entry as well. If you use icons, then even more. The only disadvantage 
is that you have to discipline yourself always modifying the whole thread and not only one entry in that thread.

Tried 2178 and I seem to hit some endless loop when I have big cookies. The loop seems to be in this for-loop (from gdb).

I perhaps you should have:

for (i = 0; *p && *p != ';' && *p != '\r' && *p != '\n' ; )

   if (i < (int) sizeof(cookie)-1)

      cookie[i++] = *p++;

   else
      break;

   cookie[i] = 0;

... Seems to be working for me =)

Yepp, you're right. I applied your change to the distribution code. 

This is currently not implemented and will probably not implemented in the next time, but it's on my (very long) to-do list.

Great, you found it! The original problem is probably related to your cookie handling. If you don't check the "keep me logged it" box, elog generates a temporary cookie, which is used for the duration of your browser session, then the browser discards it. If you theck the box, a persistent cookie is created, which your browser stores in the cookie database and reuses it for the coming 41 days. I believe you have a problem there (persistent cookies not allowed, disk full, whatever...) which does not allow handling of persistent cookies. Try from anohter browser/computer and you will see that it works.

No, this is not implemented. What I usually do is to check "Suppress Email notification", submit and revise my entry. Once I'm satisfied, I edit again and do not check "Suppress Email notification" so that the email is finally sent out.