| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
365
|
Wed Jun 4 13:11:51 2003 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Other | | Re: rhis logbook |
> I suggest MOptions - people are lazy .... :)
Not for the Version! I don't want to update this list on every release (:-(
Plus the list would get too long over time!
> by the way any possibilities to have 'multiple icons' ?
No, you have to use MOptions instead. |
|
366
|
Wed Jun 4 15:00:33 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | Other | 2.3.8 | Re: Question protection selection page command |
> could you add command for main menu guest user
> Selection Page guest = ....
I added "Guest Selection Page" coming in version 2.3.8 |
|
433
|
Sun Sep 21 09:33:46 2003 |
 | Jason | jason@jasonmorgan.com | | Other | elog2.3.9 | FreeBSD Install |
I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
Many thanks!
"Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 27: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 29: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 31: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
You4eea |
|
434
|
Sun Sep 21 09:53:56 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | Other | elog2.3.9 | Re: FreeBSD Install |
Unfortunately I don't have access to a FreeBSD box so I cannot try. But I
thought the GNU make is the same on Linux and FreeBSD???
Has anybody successful compiled under FreeBSD?
- Stefan |
|
435
|
Tue Sep 23 01:10:17 2003 |
| G | levineg@med.govt.nz | Question | Other | elog2.3.9 | Re: FreeBSD Install |
I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
It's been running under heavy use for at least a month now.
PS: you might need the linux compatibility package installed on BSD though...
> I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
> my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> "Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
> "Makefile", line 27: Need an operator
> "Makefile", line 29: Missing dependency operator
> "Makefile", line 31: Need an operator
> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
>
>
> You4eea |
|
446
|
Sun Oct 26 18:32:17 2003 |
| Dave Truesdell | davet@ttfn.com | Comment | Other | elog2.3.9 | Re: FreeBSD Install |
> I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
> I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
> the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
> It's been running under heavy use for at least a month now.
FYI- the default "make" on FreeBSD is BSD, not GNU.
The easiest way to build elog on FreeBSD is to install "gmake" (via the port or
package) and type "gmake". That's all it took for me to build a freshly
downloaded copy on 5.1 not 5 minutes ago. |
|
447
|
Tue Oct 28 22:40:28 2003 |
 | G | levineg@med.govt.nz | Comment | Other | elog2.3.9 | Re: FreeBSD Install |
Thanks for that mate, compiled elog on FreeBSD 5.1 myself no problems just like
you said, great!
>
> FYI- the default "make" on FreeBSD is BSD, not GNU.
>
> The easiest way to build elog on FreeBSD is to install "gmake" (via the port or
> package) and type "gmake". That's all it took for me to build a freshly
> downloaded copy on 5.1 not 5 minutes ago. |
|
518
|
Thu Apr 1 18:22:37 2004 |
| Robert Keeney | brassrlk@yahoo.com | Question | Other | Any | Is any one using elog on Solaris 9? |
I searched and found some problems people were having compiling it on Solaris.
However I didn't see anything else.
If your using it, was it hard to get it installed and working? |