Re: rhis logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 4 13:11:51 2003
|
> I suggest MOptions - people are lazy .... :)
Not for the Version! I don't want to update this list on every release (:-(
Plus the list would get too long over time!
> by the way any possibilities to have 'multiple icons' ?
No, you have to use MOptions instead. |
|
Re: Question protection selection page command, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 4 15:00:33 2003
|
> could you add command for main menu guest user
> Selection Page guest = ....
I added "Guest Selection Page" coming in version 2.3.8 |
FreeBSD Install, posted by Jason on Sun Sep 21 09:33:46 2003
|
I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
Many thanks!
"Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 27: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 29: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 31: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
You4eea |
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Sep 21 09:53:56 2003
|
Unfortunately I don't have access to a FreeBSD box so I cannot try. But I
thought the GNU make is the same on Linux and FreeBSD???
Has anybody successful compiled under FreeBSD?
- Stefan |
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by G on Tue Sep 23 01:10:17 2003
|
I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
It's been running under heavy use for at least a month now.
PS: you might need the linux compatibility package installed on BSD though...
> I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
> my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> "Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
> "Makefile", line 27: Need an operator
> "Makefile", line 29: Missing dependency operator
> "Makefile", line 31: Need an operator
> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
>
>
> You4eea |
|
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by Dave Truesdell on Sun Oct 26 18:32:17 2003
|
> I got elog 2.3.9 running on FreeBSD 5.1 successfully,
> I compiled elog on a redhat box and then just copied over all the files to
> the FreeBSD box and ELOG just ran with no issues.
> It's been running under heavy use for at least a month now.
FYI- the default "make" on FreeBSD is BSD, not GNU.
The easiest way to build elog on FreeBSD is to install "gmake" (via the port or
package) and type "gmake". That's all it took for me to build a freshly
downloaded copy on 5.1 not 5 minutes ago. |
Re: FreeBSD Install, posted by G on Tue Oct 28 22:40:28 2003
|
Thanks for that mate, compiled elog on FreeBSD 5.1 myself no problems just like
you said, great!
>
> FYI- the default "make" on FreeBSD is BSD, not GNU.
>
> The easiest way to build elog on FreeBSD is to install "gmake" (via the port or
> package) and type "gmake". That's all it took for me to build a freshly
> downloaded copy on 5.1 not 5 minutes ago. |
|
Is any one using elog on Solaris 9?, posted by Robert Keeney on Thu Apr 1 18:22:37 2004
|
I searched and found some problems people were having compiling it on Solaris.
However I didn't see anything else.
If your using it, was it hard to get it installed and working? |