| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1655
|
Mon Feb 6 16:44:46 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Angus Au wrote: | | ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found |
The util library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the forkpty() function call. If you know in which library the forkpty is available on solaris, the makefile could be adjusted accordingly. If the forkpty is not available at all, we have to disable the shell substitution under solaris via conditional compilation. |
| Steve Jones wrote: | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?
-- Ah, just looked at the docs, I see what that buys us. Surely there is a similar function available that is cross platform?
|
|
|
1656
|
Mon Feb 6 16:48:17 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
|
1658
|
Mon Feb 6 17:15:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: sort after find |
| Willem Koster wrote: | | Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query. |
That worked some time ago, but did not work currently. So I fixed that in the current SVN version. |
|
1664
|
Wed Feb 8 18:19:02 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Yep, I saw it. Thanks |
|
|
1666
|
Wed Feb 8 18:34:43 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Yep, I saw it. Thanks |
|
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. The URL is http://www.developerweb.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2990.
Perhaps this can be used unless someone comes up with a Solaris "util" library.
#ifdef SOLARIS /* Use the code in my_forkpty.c */
int my_forkpty (int *amaster, char *name, void *unused1, void *unused2);
#define forkpty my_forkpty
#endif
-----------------------
my_forkpty.c
-----------------------
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/stream.h>
#include <sys/stropts.h>
/* fork_pty() remplacement for Solaris.
* This ignore the last two arguments
* for the moment
*/
int
my_forkpty (int *amaster,
char *name,
void *unused1,
void *unused2)
{
int master, slave;
char *slave_name;
pid_t pid;
master = open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR);
if (master < 0)
return -1;
if (grantpt (master) < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (unlockpt (master) < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
slave_name = ptsname (master);
if (slave_name == NULL)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
slave = open (slave_name, O_RDWR);
if (slave < 0)
{
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (ioctl (slave, I_PUSH, "ptem") < 0
|| ioctl (slave, I_PUSH, "ldterm") < 0)
{
close (slave);
close (master);
return -1;
}
if (amaster)
*amaster = master;
if (name)
strcpy (name, slave_name);
pid = fork ();
switch (pid)
{
case -1: /* Error */
return -1;
case 0: /* Child */
close (master);
dup2 (slave, STDIN_FILENO);
dup2 (slave, STDOUT_FILENO);
dup2 (slave, STDERR_FILENO);
return 0;
default: /* Parent */
close (slave);
return pid;
}
return -1;
}
|
|
|
1676
|
Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. |
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.
- Stefan |
|
1678
|
Fri Feb 10 17:22:36 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris. |
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's working.
- Stefan |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
|
|
1679
|
Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that. Sound ok?
|
Sure. I put already the conditional compiling into the current Makefile, so just try it. I tested the Linux part, which is ok. If you could test the Solaris part, that would be great. |