Yes, the alarm() function is wrong here. I removed it from the Windows version and committed the code to GIT. 

 I don't see it has crashed when testing your cfg.  However, one thing I must do is to comment out the alarm_handler function in order to compile the elogd successfully.  Otherwise, it shows an undefined alarm, see in the 2nd attachment.  Although it did not crash as tested with your cfg, I have experienced the new version sometimes crashed on our system but then it self restarted (different scenario since my cfg does not use Propagate.  I have not been able to narrow down yet.

You don't need "elog" to run the logbook, the executable "elog" is only needed to create entries without the web interface. Stefan should adapt "elog.c" some day to be compatible with the default switches of modern, paranoid compilers; but for the moment you can ignore this.

If you use the newly created "elogd", does that reproduce the former problem?

Just put (char *) in front of all malloc(). I will include the fix in the next official version. 

/Stefan

 I have been able to compile Elogd successfully in Windows with Visual Studio 2010 but not with Elog.  Attached are errors, it complaint about buffer[i] type char * being assigned type void *.  If anyone has been successful compile the elog, please give me a hint.  Thanks.

> > In the past couple of days, I seem to have developed a problem with making entries into elog's displayed with Chrome (the latest, 31.0.1650.63) on 
> > Mac OS (10.9.1, the latest).  The problem occurs with attempting to edit or enter HTML encoded pages with fckedit; although pages render correctly 
> > in list mode, if you try to edit or enter an entry, the page is blank, the cursor is missing, you can't see text or type new text. 
> 
> That's strange. I just tried myself (by accident I have the same versions of Chrome and OSX) and it just worked fine. The fckedit code has not change a long time, so I guess it's not related to the exact version of 
> elogd. Anyhow I want to switch to ckedit when I get some time, which maybe fixes the problem. What happens if you try to write in this forum, do you have the same problem? Sometime the fcdedit code take 
> quite long time to load when accessed remotely. If your browser gives up, you might hat to click on "reload". In chrome there is also the "Developer tools" window, which shows you all HTTP requests and 
> responses on the network. Otherwise I run out of ideas what could be different for you compared to me.
> 
> Cheers,
> Stefan

Later on, I tried the prescription pointed to in that thread that says in scripts/fckeditor/editor/js/fckeditorcode_gecko.js to replace

FCKTools.FixDocumentParentWindow = function(A){ if (A.document) A.document.parentWindow=A; for (var i=0;i<A.frames.length;i++) FCKTools.FixDocumentParentWindow(A.frames[i]);};

with: 

FCKTools.FixDocumentParentWindow = function(A){try{ if (A.document) A.document.parentWindow=A;} catch(e){};for (var i=0;i<A.frames.length;i++) FCKTools.FixDocumentParentWindow(A.frames[i]);};

and after I got all my brackets straight, my pages were visible.  I'm still not sure when this turned up, since I use my elog every day (hour) and so I'd hardly miss it when I upgraded various things, although I don't watch Chrome updating itself that closely.

Have a good holiday!

> In the past couple of days, I seem to have developed a problem with making entries into elog's displayed with Chrome (the latest, 31.0.1650.63) on 
> Mac OS (10.9.1, the latest).  The problem occurs with attempting to edit or enter HTML encoded pages with fckedit; although pages render correctly 
> in list mode, if you try to edit or enter an entry, the page is blank, the cursor is missing, you can't see text or type new text. 

That's strange. I just tried myself (by accident I have the same versions of Chrome and OSX) and it just worked fine. The fckedit code has not change a long time, so I guess it's not related to the exact version of 
elogd. Anyhow I want to switch to ckedit when I get some time, which maybe fixes the problem. What happens if you try to write in this forum, do you have the same problem? Sometime the fcdedit code take 
quite long time to load when accessed remotely. If your browser gives up, you might hat to click on "reload". In chrome there is also the "Developer tools" window, which shows you all HTTP requests and 
responses on the network. Otherwise I run out of ideas what could be different for you compared to me.

Cheers,
Stefan